Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Alvarez-Rodriguez v. Meyer”
*557 BOWNES, Circuit Judge. This case arises out of the unwarranted shooting of plaintiff-appellee, Carlos A. Gutierrez-Rodriguez, by police officers of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Plaintiff, rendered a paraplegic as a result of the shooting, sued the officers involved and their supervisors under 42
United States v. Martinez-Alvarezpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Roberto Martinez-Alvarez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United *286States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Martinez-A
Wu v. Uber Tech., Inc.public domain
Wu v Uber Tech., Inc. (2023 NY Slip Op 04706) Wu v Uber Tech., Inc. 2023 NY Slip Op 04706 Decided on September 21, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.</
Wu v. Uber Tech., Inc.public domain
Wu v Uber Tech., Inc. (2023 NY Slip Op 04706) Wu v Uber Tech., Inc. 2023 NY Slip Op 04706 Decided on September 21, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.</
McCalla v. Piris-Fraserpublic domain
McCalla v Piris-Fraser (2023 NY Slip Op 05722) McCalla v Piris-Fraser 2023 NY Slip Op 05722 Decided on November 15, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Adegbite v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 20-1183 C Filed: October 29, 2021 ________________________________________ ) ADE ADEGBITE, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v.
United States v. Mata-Alvarezpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Oscar Mata-Alvarez raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez, 711 F.3d 541, 562-63 & n.28 (5th Cir. 2013) (en banc), in which we held that the generic, contemporary definition of sexual abuse of a minor does not require the age of consent to be below 17 years old and does not include an age-differential
City of Pearsall v. Robert Tobiaspublic domain
ACCEPTED 04-15-00302-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
RamiroAviles v. S&P Global, Inc.public domain
J. PAUL OETKEN, United States District Judge *246In these five related cases, one of which is a putative derivative and class action, a collective total of over 500 offshore investors ("Plaintiffs") who acquired shares in the Lifetrade Fund, B.V. ("Lifetrade") and two related funds (collectively, the "Lifetrade Funds") seek relief for the evaporation of their investmen
Davis v. Lane Management, LLCpublic domain
524 F.Supp.2d 1375 (2007) Samuel Buddie DAVIS, Sonia Davis, and Sasha Davis, Plaintiffs, v. LANE MANAGEMENT, LLC d/b/a Lane Company and SDW Realty LLC and Emerald-Nile Realty, LLC., Defendants. No. 05-22592-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. November 6, 2007. Matthew Wilson Dietz, Miami, FL, for Plaintiffs. Jeffrey Alan Blaker, Conroy, Simberg &
United States v. Don Shepherdpublic domain
EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal that should not have been pursued. Appellant Shepherd’s challenge to the PSR’s sentencing guidelines calculation was brought to the district court’s attention; the court acknowledged some uncertainty about the appropriate sentencing range; and the court explicitly sought to “moot” the challenge. This the court did by issuing a sente
United States v. Rafael Tellopublic domain
CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge: A federal grand jury returned a three-count indictment charging Rafael Tello with transporting an illegal alien within the United States by means of a motor vehicle. At an immigration checkpoint, the aliens were found hidden in a storage compartment in the sleeper area of the tractor-trailer that Tello was driving. The case proceeded to trial on the first t
United States v. Gelacio Lara-Martinezpublic domain
STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: Gelacio Lara-Martinez pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after being previoúsly deported. He appeals the district court’s determination that his underlying Missouri conviction for sexual misconduct involving a child qualified as a crime of violence, specifically sexual abuse of a minor, under the Sentencing Guidelines. I.
City of Uvalde v. Alyssa Pargaspublic domain
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-23-00150-CV CITY OF UVALDE, Appellant v. Alyssa PARGAS,
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas OPINION No. 04-22-00424-CV UNITED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellant v. Patricia Y. MAYERS,
State v. Jefferypublic domain
380 December 6, 2023 No. 636 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MARTY ANWAR JEFFERY, Defendant-Appellant. Washington County Circuit Court 20CR31252; A176879 Janelle F. Wipper, Judge. Argued and submitted April 26, 2023. Sara F. Werbof
United States v. Oscar Vigilpublic domain
MORGAN, District Judge: Defendant-Appellant Oscar Arnulfo Vigil (“Vigil”) was convicted of illegal re-entry-after deportation and sentenced to 41 months in prison. The district court applied a 16-level “crime of violence” enhancement based on a prior state-court conviction for sexual battery. The sole issue on appeal is whether the district court erred by imposing the enhancement.
United States v. Tomas Puga-Yanezpublic domain
PER CURIAM: Tomas Puga-Yanez (“Puga-Yanez”) appeals his sentence. Puga-Yanez contends that the district court committed reversible error by applying a sixteen-level sentencing enhancement based on his prior conviction of child molestation. For the *319 reasons that follow, we AFFIRM Puga-Yanez’s sen
United States v. Jeremias Ovalle-Chunpublic domain
PER CURIAM: Defendant-Appellant Jeremías Ovalle-Chun pleaded guilty to one count of illegal reentry into the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Because the district court held that Ovalle-Chun’s 2004 conviction for aggravated menacing in Delaware was for a “crime of violence” under § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii) of the United States
FOMB v. Cooperativa de Ahorro y Creditopublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1079 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT