Cases

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, April 27, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21I0177. BIBB COUNTY HEALTH CARE, LLC d/b/a ARCHWAY TRANSITIONAL CARE CENTER et al. v. AMANDA ADAMS et al. . Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. T

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-25-00191-CV AMANDA ADAMS, APPELLANT V. ALLEN BUTLER CONSTRUCTION, INC., APPELLEE On Appeal from the 237th District Court Lubbock County, Texas Tr

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-16-00280-CR AMANDA CHRISTINE ADAMS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 19th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016-395-C1

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-16-00280-CR AMANDA CHRISTINE ADAMS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 19th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No.

ANTOON, District Judge: Amanda Sue Smith filed, a three-count complaint against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) seeking damages arising from a soured business arrangement she entered into with an FBI confidential informant. The district court granted the United States’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, finding

Beck, J. In this case we are asked to decide whether a District Court judge has the inherent power to expunge a civil abuse protection order, issued pursuant to G. L. c. 209A, from the Statewide domestic violence registry when the order was obtained through fraud on the court. We hold that he does. Introduction. Jake Jones and Amanda Adams were involved *72

PER CURIAM: Claimant brought this action for damage to her 2003 Dodge Neon which occurred when she was traveling on County Route 39 near Swiss in Nicholas County, and the vehicle struck a large hole in the road. Respondent was responsible at all times herein for the maintenance of County Route 39. The Court is of the opinion to deny this claim for the reasons set forth more fully below. The incident giving r

JUSTICE APPLETON delivered the opinion of the court: Amanda Adams owned a Doberman pinscher, which bit a seven-year-old boy, Christopher Marshall. Amanda had renter’s liability insurance from Pekin Insurance Co. (Pekin), and Christopher’s father, Nicholas Marshall, submitted a claim. Pekin denied the claim and filed a complaint for rescission of the insura

789 N.E.2d 436 (2003) 338 Ill. App.3d 745 273 Ill.Dec. 536 Amanda ADAMS, by Her Father and Next Friend, Tommy ADAMS, Brittany Adams, by Her Father and Next Friend, Tommy Adams, and Tommy Adams, Individually, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. HARRAH'S MARYLAND HEIGHTS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. No. 5-02-0123. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District.<

TYSON, Judge. *659 Lisa G. Sain and James W. Sain ("Plaintiffs") appeal from order allowing the motions to dismiss of Adams Auto Group, Inc. and Capital One, N.A. (collectively, "Defendants"). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. I. Factual Background

MEMORANDUM ** California state prisoner Keith Renfrow appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 ha-beas petition as untimely. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm. Assuming that a certificate of appealability is required, we construe the argument as a motion for a certificate of appealability, and we grant the motion. See

OPINION AND ORDER CHARLES RONALD NORGLE, District Judge Plaintiffs Seneca Adams (“Seneca”), Tari Adams (“Tari”) and Sicara Adams (“Si-cara”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) proceeded to a jury trial on the issue of compensatory damages against Defendant City of Chicago (the “City”) for: (1) false arrest, in violation of the Fourth Amendment as to all Plaintiffs; (2) excessive force, in violation of the Fourth

MEMORANDUM ** California state prisoner Keith Renfrow appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 ha-beas petition as untimely. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm. Assuming that a certificate of appealability is required, we construe the argument as a motion for a certificate of appealability, and we grant the motion. See

SECOND DIVISION RICKMAN, P. J., GOBEIL and DAVIS, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules Februar

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 06–1428 Filed February 5, 2010 BRYAN RANES, Appellant, vs. ADAMS LABORATORIES, INC.; ADAMS RESPIRATORY THERAPEUTICS; OWL PHARMACY; FRANK REZNICEK; AMANDA MATHEWS; HY-VEE, INC.; McKESSON CORPORATION; and MICHAEL RINALDI, Appellees. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Appanoose County, E. Richard Meadows, Jr., Judge. Plaintiff appeals and d

568 F.3d 956 (2009) Lee P. ADAMS, Claimant-Appellant, v. Eric K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee. No. 2008-7162. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. June 15, 2009. *958 Marshall O. Potter, Jr., of Vienna, VA, argued for claimant-appellant. Meredyth Cohen Havasy, Trial Attorney, Com

658 F.3d 928 (2011) Timm ADAMS, Plaintiff, and Clinger Grower Group; Funk Grower Group; Hansen Grower Group; Jentzch-Kearl Grower Group, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant, and E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, Defendant-Appellant. Timm Adams, Plaintiff, and Clinger Grower Group; Funk Grower Group; Hansen Grower Group; Jentzch-Kearl Grower Group, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. United States of Ameri

778 N.W.2d 677 (2010) Bryan RANES, Appellant, v. ADAMS LABORATORIES, INC.; Adams Respiratory Therapeutics; Owl Pharmacy; Frank Reznicek; Amanda Mathews; Hy-Vee, Inc.; McKesson Corporation; and Michael Rinaldi, Appellees. No. 06-1428. Supreme Court of Iowa. February 5, 2010. Rehearing Denied February 23, 2010. *681

Bid protest; Job Corps Centers; Small Business Set-Asides; Statutory Construction; Workforce Investment Act OPINION BRUGGINK, Judge. This bid protest, brought by Adams and Associates, Inc., (“Adams” or “plaintiff’), once again challenges the solicitation by the Department of Labor (“DOL”) for operation of the Shriver Job Corps Cente

2018 WI 70 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2016AP537 COMPLETE TITLE: Adams Outdoor Advertising Limited Partnership, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, v. City of Madison, Defendant-Respondent. REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE