Cases

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.1110, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of part III.B. * See footnote, ante, page 1380. [EDITORS' NOTE: TEXT NOT CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION APPEARS WITH GRAY BACKGROUND BELOW.] OPINION I. INTRODUCTI

*798 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JACK ZOUHARY, District Judge. This Court previously adopted those portions of the Magistrate Judge’s Amended Report & Recommendation (“R & R”) (Doc. 31) to which no objections had been made and the parties stipulated to dismissal without prejudice of claims against Defendant Mark McDounough

Matter of Damon B. v Amanda C. (2021 NY Slip Op 03502) Matter of Damon B. v Amanda C. 2021 NY Slip Op 03502 Decided on June 3, 2021 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau p

OPINION KIRSCH, Judge. Homeowners David T. Hays and Amanda G. Hays (collectively “the Hayses”) sold their home after completing Indiana’s statutory disclosure forms. Purchaser Deborah J. Wise (“Wise”) sued the Hayses, alleging that the Hayses failed to disclose defective conditions in the home. Following a bench trial that occurred on remand from this co

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-25-00170-CR ___________________________ AMANDA MARIE RUTH WILLIAMS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from the 372nd District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1845136 Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Walker, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walke

245 P.3d 362 (2011) 2011 WY 6 Bruce B. WILLIAMS, Appellant (Plaintiff), v. CITY OF GILLETTE, Wyoming, Appellee (Defendant). No. S-10-0070. Supreme Court of Wyoming. January 19, 2011. *363 Representing Appellant: Bruce B. Williams, pro se. Representing Appellee: Kate M. Fox and Amanda K. Ferguson of

PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. Delmas v. Harris, 806 So.2d 578, 579 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Nagh*582tin v. Jones, 680 So.2d 573 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). B.L. THOMAS, OSTERHAUS, and WINSOR, JJ:, concur.

{¶ 1} This is an appeal from a decision of the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, which, following an admission by appellant, William B., a minor, found appellant in violation of a prior court order, pursuant to a motion to show cause, for failing to follow the terms and conditions of the Youth Treatment Center ("YTC"). For the reasons that follow, we reverse the decision of the trial court. {¶ 2} Appellant was adjudicat

400 B.R. 479 (2008) In re Charles Edward WILLIAMS, Debtor. Sean C. Logan, Trustee, Plaintiff v. Charles Edward Williams, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 05-28334-JS. Adversary No. 06-2028-JS. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland. March 17, 2008. *482 Douglas B. Riley, Esquire, Camilla B. Russack, Esquire, Sean C. Lo

826 A.2d 985 (2003) In re STEPHANIE B. In re AMANDA A. In re THOMAS J. Nos. 2002-490-MY., 2002-491-M.P., 2002-492-M.P. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. June 30, 2003. *987 Charles Blackman, Esq., Thomas Corrigan, Esq., and Joseph Victor Smith, Esq., Providence, for Plaintiff. Joyce Ioanes, Esq., Richard J. Welch, Esq., Marth

NGUYEN, Circuit Judge, dissenting: The majority allows the Gayes to accomplish what no one has before: copyright a musical style. "Blurred Lines" and "Got to Give It Up" are not objectively similar. They differ in melody, harmony, and rhythm. Yet by refusing to compare the two works, the majority establishes a dangerous precedent that strikes a devastating blow to future musicians and composers everywhere. While

ORDER JAMES E. GRITZNER, Senior Judge, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT This matter is before the Court on a Motion for Preliminary Injunction by *1211Plaintiff Dickten Masch Plastics, LLC (Dickten Masch),- ECF No. 12, and a Motion to Dismiss by Defendants Angela Williams, Patricia Lipski, Mathew Hos-ford, Tom Conley, Douglas Oelschlaeger, Lily Lij

379 S.C. 451 (2008) 665 S.E.2d 667 Dugan J. McLAUGHLIN, Appellant, v. Sally W. WILLIAMS, Coldwell Banker Chicora Real Estate, Dunes Realty, Inc., Dan Laudone d/b/a U.S. Home Inspections, Inc., and Michael W. Alpaugh d/b/a Xtreme Termite & Pest Control, Defendants, of whom Sally W. Williams, Coldwell Banker Chicora Real Estate, and Dunes Realty, Inc. are Respondents. No. 4421. <

THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge. For the reasons discussed in the consolidated case of George Raymond Williams, M.D., Orthopaedic Surgery, A Professional Medical L.L.C., et al. v. Bestcomp, Inc., et al., 15-761 (La.App. 3 Cir. 2/3/16), — So.3d —, this court finds that it has subject matter jurisdiction to consider the appeal of that case, rendering the application for a supervisory writ moot. We, therefore, deny the writ ap

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Mar 22 2019, 10:19 am court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral CLERK Indiana Supreme Court est

Opinion filed September 19, 2024 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________ No. 11-24-00214-CV ___________ AMANDA GARCIA, Appellant V. ANDREA ARCIDES, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Ector C

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1816 AMANDA RAKES, Administrator of the Estate of Amylyn Slaymaker and Next Friend to the minor children G.C. and M.C., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JONATHAN P. ROEDERER and ESTATE OF TE’JUAN JOHNSON, Defendants-Appellees.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1017 HENRY JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMANDA LAMB, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Cent

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO APPROPRIATELY TIMED IN LI-MINE APPLICATIONS McMAHON, District Judge. Plaintiff Veleron Holding, B.V. (“Veler-on”) brings this lawsuit against Morgan *413Stanley, Morgan Stanley Capital Services, Inc., Morgan St