Cases

9 N.Y.3d 324 (2007) 880 N.E.2d 416 849 N.Y.S.2d 872 JOAN HAYMON, Individually and as Mother and Natural Guardian of L.H., an Infant, Appellant, v. DONALD J. PETTIT et al., Defendants, and AUBURN COMMUNITY NON-PROFIT BASEBALL ASSOCIATION, INC., Respondent. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued October 18, 2007. Deci

(2008) INNIS ARDEN GOLF CLUB v. PITNEY BOWES, INC. et al. No. 3:06 CV 1352 (JBA). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. March 4, 2008. RULING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S DEMAND FOR A TRIAL BY JURY JOAN GLAZER MARGOLIS, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Innis Arden Golf Club commenced this action on Augus

JOAN BERNARD ARMSTRONG, Chief Judge. | ,The defendant-appellant, Greg Meffert, appeals a judgment dated April 7, 2010, and, more particularly, that portion of the judgment denying his motion for JNOV. We affirm. Plaintiffs-appellees, Southern Electronic Supply, Inc. (“Southern”) and Active Solutions, L.L.C. (“Active Solutions”) describe themselves as business collaborators who developed and marketed to th

209 B.R. 810 (1997) In re RICH'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 96-11793-JNF. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts. June 30, 1997. *811 Jonathan D. Yellin, Peter J. Antoszyk and Leslie A. Hawes, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, Boston, MA, for Jonathan D. Tellin, trustee. John C. LaLiberte, Sherin &a;

Opinion issued November 26, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00013-CV ——————————— SAN JACINTO RIVER AUTHORITY, Appellant V. VICENTE MEDINA; ASHLEY MEDINA; ARIS ANTONIOU; TODD ALLEN; DEAMON BEEMA

812 F.Supp.2d 434 (2011) David LaCHAPELLE, Plaintiff, v. Robyn Rihanna FENTY p/k/a Rihanna, Island Def Jam Music Group, a division of UMG Recordings, Inc., Melina Matsoukas, and Black Dog Films, Inc., Defendants. No. 11 Civ. 945(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 20, 2011. *437 Debra Anne Mayer, Esq., Shatzki

Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the Pacific Reporter. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.gov. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA AVCG, LLC, ) ) Supreme Court No.: S-18170 Appella

Armstrong, J. ¶1 Azel Luke Chavez appeals his convictions for robbery, assault, unlawful possession of a firearm, taking a motor vehicle without permission, and attempted murder, arguing that he was constitutionally entitled to a jury trial, that his assault conviction violates separation of powers, that the court admitted his custodial confessions in violation of Miranda,1 and that the court admitt

142 P.3d 1110 (2006) STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Azel Luke CHAVEZ, Appellant. No. 33240-0-II. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2. August 22, 2006. *1112 Jodi R. Backlund, Manek R. Mistry, Backlund & Mistry, Olympia, WA, for Appellant. Tracey L. Lassus, Clallam County Pros. Office, Port Angeles, WA, for

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO APPROPRIATELY TIMED IN LI-MINE APPLICATIONS McMAHON, District Judge. Plaintiff Veleron Holding, B.V. (“Veler-on”) brings this lawsuit against Morgan *413Stanley, Morgan Stanley Capital Services, Inc., Morgan St

754 F.Supp.2d 1208 (2010) In re TOYOTA MOTOR CORP. UNINTENDED ACCELERATION MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION This document relates to: All personal liability/wrong death cases. Case No. 8:10ML 02151 JVS (FMOx). United States District Court, C.D. California. December 9, 2010. *1211 Andrea Bierstein, Clinton

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1057 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ex rel. KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, II, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Virginia, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, in her official capacity, Defendant – Appellant. −−−−−−−−−

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ex rel.  KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, II, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Virginia, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, in her official capacity, Defendant-Appellant. AMERICA’S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS; CHAMBER OF

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1374 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1375 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPL

*85ORDER (Final Judgment) AMANDA L. ROCKMAN, Associate Judge. INTRODUCTION On November 11, 2006, the General Council removed President George Lewis pursuant to General Council Resolution 11-11-06A. The General Council based his removal on charges attached to the Notice to Remove from Office. The plaintiff sought a prelim

DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge. *165TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION........................................................166 II. BACKGROUND.........................................................168 A. THE PARTIES......................................................1

F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH MAR 5 1999 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS PATRICK FISHER Clerk

785 F.Supp.2d 883 (2011) In re TOYOTA MOTOR CORP. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation. This Document Relates To: All Foreign Plaintiffs' Economic Loss Cases. Case No. 8:10ML 02151 JVS (FMOx). United States District Court, C.D. California. April 8, 2011. *888 Andrea Bierstein, Clinton

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERT L. WILKINS, District Judge. Plaintiff Libertarian National Committee, Inc. (“LNC”) has been left a bequest that it is unable to take in one lump sum payment because Defendant Federal Election Commission (“FEC”) believes that, due to the large amount of the bequest, to do so would violate the Federal Election Campaig

174 F.3d 1087 160 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2650, 137 Lab.Cas. P 10,390,23 Employee Benefits Cas. 1073, 1999 CJ C.A.R. 1703 Terry A. GARVIN; John McGrail; Ferdnand Adamson; EdithAitken; Marva Akins; Douglas R. Allen; Shirley Allen;Loren Alm; Sheila Altman; Cornelious Anderson; Peggy C.Anderson; Claudette B. Anterin; Esther Arnold; Kenneth G.Arsenault; Jerry M. Ashley; Lindy Ashley; Johnice M.