Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Amanda Kelsey Mitchell”
David Wesley Kelsey v. Statepublic domain
Opinion filed February 21, 2019 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-17-00053-CR __________ DAVID WESLEY KELSEY, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 32nd District Court
Voda v. Cordis Corp.public domain
506 F.Supp.2d 868 (2007) Jan K. VODA, M.D., Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, v. CORDIS CORPORATION, Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff. No. CIV-03-1512-L. United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma. March 27, 2007. *869 *870 *871 John A. Kenney, Spe
Fairfax County School Board v. Martin-Elberhipublic domain
687 S.E.2d 91 (2009) 55 Va. App. 543 FAIRFAX COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD v. Amanda MARTIN-ELBERHI. Record No. 0981-09-4. Court of Appeals of Virginia, Alexandria. January 12, 2010. Michael N. Salveson (Andrea Zizzi; Littler Mendelson, P.C., McLean, on brief), for appellant. Joseph M. Caturano, Jr. (Colten Cummins Watson & Vincent P.C., Fai
In re Application to the Bar of Statepublic domain
Loretta H. Rush, Chief Justice of Indiana On May 14, 2019, the applicants of the Counties of the State of Indiana set opposite their respective names as set forth in Exhibit "A" (attached hereto and made a part hereof) personally appeared in open Court. The State Board of Law Examiners of the State of Indiana, after due investigation as to the moral character and fitness of the applicants and examination to determine their respectiv
Joseph Di Biase v. SPX Corporationpublic domain
Affirmed by published opinion. Chief Judge Gregory wrote the opinion, in which Judge King and Judge Keenan joined. GREGORY, Chief Judge: The individual plaintiffs, retirees of SPX Corporation (“SPX”), their spouses and eligible dependents, and their labor union, the International Union United Automobile, Aerospace and
Case: 23-1977 Document: 38 Page: 1 Filed: 04/08/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ AZURITY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. ALKEM LABORATORIES LTD., Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2023-1977 ______________________ Appeal from the United
In re Admin. Actionspublic domain
This list is being published pursuant to Gov.Bar R. 1(15). The following persons have applied to take the February 2017 Ohio Bar Examination. Allen Taylor Gene Vance Lima Ashland Sarah Kathleen Lewis Austinburg Belmont Carson Lee Schambach St. Clairsville Butler Eric ScottBeutel Liberty Township Marc Edward Bras
Smith v. Walle Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DANNY C. REEVES, District Judge. Defendant Walle Corporation (“Walle”) has moved for summary judgment on Plaintiff Deming Smith’s claims for age-related discrimination in violation of the Kentucky Civil Rights Act (“KCRA”), KRS Chapter 344 et seq. [Record No. 10]1 In addition to a hostile work environment claim, Smith alleges that Walle discr
19-2155 In Re: Mirena IUS Levonorgestrel-Related Products Liability Litigation (No. II) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2020 (Argued: December 2, 2020 Decided: December 8,2020) Docket No. 19-2155 IN RE: MIRENA IUS LEVONORGESTREL-RELATED PRODUCTS LIABILITY
Diess v. Pennsylvania Department of Transportationpublic domain
935 A.2d 895 (2007) Barbara DIESS & Stewart Diess, Individually and as husband and wife, and Shawn Diess, and Rhonda Jarvis & John Jarvis, Individually and as husband and wife, and John Jarvis, Jr. and William Debevec and Robyn Lenhart & Tim Lenhart, Individually and as husband and wife and as parents and natural guardians of Tyler Lenhart, a minor, Brittany Lenhart, a minor, and Alicia Lenhart, a minor, and Amanda Lenhart and Jamie Wilson &a;
United States v. Warnagirispublic domain
Appendix A Department of Justice Chart Documenting Sentences in Capitol Breach Cases Monday, January 6, 2025 SENTENCES IMPOSED IN CASES ARISING OUT OF THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6, 2021 Disclaimer: Those relying on information contained in this document should verify all information for accuracy Table 1: Cases in which the government recommended a probation sentence without home detention 1 0F Defendant Ca
Matter of Attorneys Inviolation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2024 NY Slip Op 04648) Matter of Attorneys Inviolation of Judiciary Law § 468-a 2024 NY Slip Op 04648 Decided on September 26, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DAVID KRIEGER, ANDREW KRIEGER, JAMES FOR PUBLICATION SPERLING, and MARGARET SPERLING, on September 7, 2023 Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly 9:05 a.m. Si
Jihad Adbul-Mumit v. Alexandria Hyundai, LLCpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1582 JIHAD ADBUL-MUMIT; MATTHEW ABEDI; MONICA ADAIR SARGENT; MARK AGEE; ALIZ AGOSTON; YVONNE ALSTON; DAN AMATRUDA; KRISTY AMBROSE; KIMBERLEY AMICK; WANDA G. AMOS; CHRISTOPHER ARAUZA; CARL ARSENAULT; BROOKE ASHER; MICHELLE ATKINS; RAYMOND O. ATKINS; MATTHEW ATWELL; DAVID AUB; SOHA AYYASH; ASIF AZIZ; SUSAN BAILEY; KAREN BAKER; HAB BA
ACCEPTED 15-24-00111-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/30/2025 4:51 PM No. 15-24-00111-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
State of Tennessee v. Sandy L. Binkleypublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 19, 2011 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. SANDY L. BINKLEY Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Sumner County No. CR63-2009 Dee David Gay, Judge No. M2010-00486-CCA-R3-CD - Filed August 23, 2011 A Sumner County jury convicted the Defendant, Sandy L. Binkley, of two counts of statutory rap
International Refugee Assistance Project v. Trumppublic domain
BARBARA MILANO KEENAN, Circuit Judge, with whom JUDGE THACKER joins except as to Part II.A.L, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment: I concur in the majority opinion’s analysis with respect to its conclusions: (1) that the stated “national security purpose” of the Second Executive Order1 likely fails Mandel’s “bona fide” test and violates the Establishment C
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT ANTHONY J. BATTAGLIA, District Judge. This action arises out of a criminal intrusion into a computer network system used to provide online gaming and Internet connectivity via an individual’s gaming console or personal computer. Plaintiffs, a nationwide putative consumer clas
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr