⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Amber Meyers v. McDonalds USA LLC”

Appellate Court of Illinois · 2023-01-31 · Published · cited 5× · 225 N.E.3d 728; 2023 IL App (5th) 230035
2023 IL App (5th) 230035 NOTICE Decision filed 01/31/23. The text of this decision may be NO. 5-23-0035 changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Peti ion for Rehearing or the disposition of IN THE the same. APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT _______________________________________________________________
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-08-24 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2016-01-12 · Published · cited 11× · 2015 IL App (2d) 150067
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Illinois Official Reports Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-03-18 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-15-00126-CV
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2016-07-28 · Published · cited 1× · 554 B.R. 655
ORDER GRANTING SHAREHOLDER DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A STAY MARTIN GLENN, United States Bankruptcy Judge Pending before the Court are the following motions (collectively, the “Motions”): (i) Shareholder Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, or, in the Alternative, for a Stay (the “Fund 1 Motion,” Adv. Pro. No. 10-04609, ECF Doc. #2387) and (ii) Shareholder De
McDonald v. Wisepublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014-10-28 · Published · cited 87× · 769 F.3d 1202; 39 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 413; 39 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 413; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 20659; 98 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,177; 2014 WL 5438095
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge. Former mayoral appointee, Wayne McDonald, filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Colorado state law after he was terminated from his position with the City of Denver based on the complaint of Officer Leslie Wise that he had sexually harassed her. He sued the Mayor of Denver, the Mayor’s press secretary, and the City and County of Denver for due pr
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013-12-20 · Published · cited 4× · 12 F. Supp. 3d 1079; 87 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 646; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 179370; 2013 WL 6730763
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Thomas M. Durkin, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Michael Jones and Michael Anthony Wilbern (together the “individual plaintiffs”) and their respective companies, MBAJ Group, LLC and Wilbern Enterprises, LLC (together the “corporate plaintiffs”), brought this lawsuit against *1081Defendant Culver Franchising
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2026-04-30 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 24-1823 Document: 65 Page: 1 Filed: 04/30/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ROBERT A. PRESSLY, ET AL., Plaintiffs JASON BREHM, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellees v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant ______________________ 202
Conover v. Conoverpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2016-07-07 · Published · cited 30× · 146 A.3d 433; 450 Md. 51; 2016 Md. LEXIS 813
Michelle L. Conover v. Brittany D. Conover, No. 79, September Term, 2015, Opinion by Adkins, J. FAMILY LAW — VISITATION AND CUSTODY — DE FACTO PARENT: De facto parents have standing to contest custody or visitation and need not show parental unfitness or exceptional circumstances before a trial court can apply a best interests of the child analysis. The Court’s previous decision in Janice M. v. Margaret K., 404 Md. 661 (2008), is overruled. Circuit Court for Washington County Case No.: 21-C-13
District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2011-03-17 · Published · cited 1× · 274 F.R.D. 193; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29598; 2011 WL 1044496
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER R. CLARKE VANDERVORT, United States Magistrate Judge. Pending are Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Relevant Deposition Testimony (Document No. 166.) and Defendants’ Cross-Motion to Preclude Irrelevant Deposition Questioning and for Protective Order (Document No. 167.). Having considered the parties’ Motions and determined that the information which Plaintiff would compel
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010-02-09 · Published · cited 0× · 685 F. Supp. 2d 186; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57996
AMENDED MEMORANDUM *195AND ORDER1 SARIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION New York City and forty-two New York counties have brought suit against numerous pharmaceutical manufacturers and subsidiaries alleging Medicaid fraud in violation of the federal Best Prices Statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1
Albers v. Lyonpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026-01-23 · Published · cited 0× · 2026 Ohio 209
[Cite as Albers v. Lyon, 2026-Ohio-209.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO JAMES ALBERS, : APPEAL NO. C-250017 TRIAL NO. A-1903421 FRIEDA AARON, : PATRICIA ADAMS, : JUDGMENT ENTRY MICHELLE AGEE,
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-03-20 · Published · cited 21× · 133 F.4th 852
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VIRGINIA DUNCAN; PATRICK No. 23-55805 LOVETTE; DAVID MARGUGLIO; CHRISTOPHER WADDELL; D.C. No. CALIFORNIA RIFLE & PISTOL 3:17-cv-01017- ASSOCIATION, INC., a California BEN-JLB corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, OPINION v. ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California,
Supreme Court of the United States · 2023-06-29 · Published · cited 189× · 600 U.S. 181
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 600 U. S. Part 1 Pages 181–411 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 29, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2025-04-23 · Published · cited 1× · 135 F.4th 1271
USCA11 Case: 24-10139 Document: 59-1 Date Filed: 04/23/2025 Page: 1 of 111 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-10139 ____________________ BRUCE HENRY,
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2021-06-18 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 19–1644 Submitted December 16, 2020—Filed June 18, 2021 Amended October 12, 2021 IOWA CITIZENS FOR COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT and FOOD & WATER WATCH, Appellees, vs. STATE OF IOWA; DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES; BRUCE TRAUTMAN, In His Official Capacity as Acting Director of the Department of Natural Resources; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION COMMISSION; MARY BOOTE, NANCY COUSER, LISA GOCH
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2021-06-18 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 19–1644 Submitted December 16, 2020—Filed June 18, 2021 IOWA CITIZENS FOR COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT and FOOD & WATER WATCH, Appellees, vs. STATE OF IOWA; DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES; BRUCE TRAUTMAN, In His Official Capacity as Acting Director of the Department of Natural Resources; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION COMMISSION; MARY BOOTE, NANCY COUSER, LISA GOCHENOUR, REBECCA GUINN, HOWARD HILL, HAROLD HOMM
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2021-11-04 · Published · cited 0×
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court