Cases

FILED IN st 1 COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TX 12/07/2015 CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE, NO. CLERK IN THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF TE

MEMORANDUM. OPINION ON PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT TO DENY DISCHARGEABILITY OF DEBT PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. § 523 [Adv. Doc. No. 1] Jeff Bohm, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. Introduction Prosecution of complaints to determine dischargeability under 11 U.S.C. *720§ 523(a)(2)(A)1

ACCEPTED 04-14-00829-cv 04-14-00829-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXA

*521Opinión disidente emitida por la Juez Asociada Señora Ro-dríguez Rodríguez, a la que se une el Juez Presidente Señor Hernández Denton y la Jueza Asociada Señora Fiol Matta. La controversia traída ante nuestra consideración en esta ocasión requería que delimitáramos el ámbito de cu-bierta de una fianza de pago que garantiza un cont

ACCEPTED 13-13-00549-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 1/6/2015 11:12:49 AM

EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO Annette Camacho Rivera, et. al. 2019 TSPR 54 Peticionarios 202 DPR ____ v. Richard Mitchell, Inc., et. al. Certiorari Recurridos Número del Caso: AC-2015-93 Fecha: 27 de marzo de 2019 Tribunal de Apelaciones: Región Judicial de San Juan, Panel III Abogado de la part

377 B.R. 513 (2007) In re SUNPOINT SECURITIES, INC., Debtor. Securities Investor Protection Corporation and Robert G. Richardson, Trustee of the Estate of Sunpoint Securities, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Cheshier & Fuller, L.L.P., King Bourland, Jeff Cheshier, Jack Sprawls, James Conner, Jack Savage and Bret Robertson, Defendants. Cheshier & Fuller, L.L.P., Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Van R. Lewis, III, Mary Ellen Wilder, and Doug

ACCEPTED 15-25-00120-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/16/2025 11:54 AM No. 15-25-000120-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

JAMES F. McKAY III, Chief Judge. | plaintiffs, Linus and Terralene Ig-bokwe, appeal the trial court’s judgment, which granted a motion for summary judgment and/or exception of res judicata and dismissed plaintiffs’ claims against defendants, Southbrook Christian Church (“Southbrook”) and Erie Insurance Company (“Erie”), with prejudice. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand. STATEMEN

§ ABIE WOLF, No. 08-14-00236-CV § Appellant, Appeal from the § v. 243rd District Court § GARRY AND BONNIE STARR,

McAnany, J.: Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Company (Lumbermens) appeals from the judgment awarded to Evergreen Pallet, L.L.C. and Evergreen Recycle, L.L.C. (Evergreen) in the amount of $231,000 based on Evergreen’s claim that Lum-bermens improperly failed to pay a claim for losses associated with a fire in a commercial mulch pile owned and maintained by Evergreen. On ap

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ANN D. MONTGOMERY, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On December 12, 2013, the undersigned United States District Judge heard oral argument on Defendants Toyota Motor Corp., Toyota Motor North America, Inc., Calty Design Research, Inc., Toyota Motor Engineering and Manufacturing North America, Inc., Toyota Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc., and Toyota Motor S

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS BETH BLOOM, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs Dwight Wilson, Jesus A. Avelar-Lemus, Jessie Cross and Mattie Cross’ (“Plaintiffs”) Class Action Complaint, ECF No. [1] (the “Complaint”), filed by Defendants Ever-Bank and Everhome Mortgage (together, “EverBank” and EverBank’s

ROLAND L. BELSOME, Judge. |,This class action arises out of the mass reduction in force of the Orleans Parish School Board following Hurricane Katrina. After a bench trial on the merits, the trial court rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and against the Orleans Parish School Board and the Louisiana Department of Education, jointly and solidarily, for compensatory damages. The judgment: 1) denied all peremptory exceptio

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO DISMISS THELTON E. HENDERSON, District Judge. Presently under consideration are two motions, filed by the County of Sonoma and the City of Santa Rosa, their law enforcement agencies and officials (“County Defendants” and “City Defendants,” respectively), which, taken together, request dismissal of all claims presented in this suit. For the reas

881 A.2d 290 (2005) 275 Conn. 534 STATE of Connecticut v. Laquan LEDBETTER. No. 17307. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued April 12, 2005. Decided September 27, 2005. *295 Lisa J. Steele, special public defender, for the appellant (defendant). Nancy L. Chupak, assistant state's att

135 S.W.3d 657 (2004) COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. Hal LAPRAY, et al., Respondents. No. 02-0705. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued October 15, 2003. Decided May 7, 2004. *660 James J. Scheske, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Austin, for Amicus Curiae Emachines, Inc. Roger Higgins, Thomp

243 P.3d 289 (2010) STATE of Hawai`i, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lloyd PRATT, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 27897, 27898, 27899. Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawai`i. November 18, 2010. *290 Daniel G. Hempey (Elif Z. Yarnall with him on the brief), for Defendant-Appellant. Tracy Murakami, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney (Craig A.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment Dismissing Complaint in its Entirety, filed March 29, 2013 (Doc. 26)(“MTD & MSJ.”). The Court held a hearing on November 1, 2013. The primary issue is whether the Court will dismiss for failure to state a claim or gr

25 P.3d 225 (2001) 130 N.M. 386 2001-NMSC-017 STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Petitioner, v. Candelario CARDENAS-ALVAREZ, Defendant-Respondent. No. 26,130. Supreme Court of New Mexico. April 30, 2001. *227 Patricia A. Madrid, Attorney General, Arthur W. Pepin, Assistant Attorney Gene