Cases

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1882 Doc: 42 Filed: 12/13/2024 Pg: 1 of 15 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1882 AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Plaintiff – Appellant, v.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT GEORGE K. YOUNG, JR., No. 12-17808 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 1:12-cv-00336- HG-BMK STATE OF HAWAII; NEIL ABERCROMBIE, in his capacity as Governor of the State of Hawaii; OPINION DAVID MARK LOUIE I, Esquire, in his capacity as State Attor

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EDWARD PERUTA; MICHELLE No. 10-56971 LAXSON; JAMES DODD; LESLIE BUNCHER, DR.; MARK CLEARY; D.C. No. CALIFORNIA RIFLE AND PISTOL 3:09-cv-02371- ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION, IEG-BGS Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; WILLIAM D. GORE, individually and in his capacity as Sheriff, Defenda

256 B.R. 1 (2000) In re TOY KING DISTRIBUTORS, INC., Debtor. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Toy King Distributors, Inc. Plaintiff, v. Liberty Savings Bank, FSB, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 90-00528-BKC-6C1. Adversary No. 91-022. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. November 9, 2000. *2

Reversed by published opinion. Judge LUTTIG wrote the opinion for the Court, in which Judge MICHAEL and Judge TRAXLER joined. LUTTIG, Circuit Judge. Appellee Jose Padilla, a United States citizen, associated with forces hostile to the United States in Afghanistan and took up arms against United States forces in that country in our war against al Qaeda. Upon

OPINION WILKINSON, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs Jose Padilla, presently incarcerated due to his conviction after trial for federal crimes of terrorism, and his mother, Estela Lebrón, sue for legal and equitable relief based on Padilla’s prior military detention as an “enemy combatant.” Padilla names as defendants the present Secretary of Defense and a number o

WYNN, Circuit Judge: *353Defendants Harold W. Clarke, in his official capacity as director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, and David Zook, in his official capacity as warden of Virginia's Sussex I State Prison (collectively, "State Defendants"), appeal a decision by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia holdin

MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge. As in numerous other cases pending in this and other jurisdictions across the country, this ease involves a copyright owner’s effort to protect a copyrighted work from unknown individuals, who are allegedly illegally copying and distributing the work on the Internet. Plaintiff AF Holdings LLC

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1440 Doc: 123 Filed: 05/08/2024 Pg: 1 of 37 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1440 LONNIE BILLARD, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CHARLOTTE CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL; MECKLENBURG AR

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1714 Doc: 56 Filed: 06/14/2022 Pg: 1 of 37 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1714 WILLIAM THORPE; FREDERICK HAMMER; DMITRY KHAVKIN; GERALD MCNABB; GARY WALL; VERNON BROOKS; BRIAN CAVITT; DEREK CORNELISON; CHRI

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6257 THOMAS PORTER; ANTHONY BERNARD JUNIPER; MARK LAWLOR, Plaintiffs - Appellees, and RICKY GRAY; IVAN TELEGUZ, Plaintiffs, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE; DAVID ZOOK, Defendants

Justice WAINWRIGHT delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Justice HECHT, Justice GREEN, Justice JOHNSON and Justice WILLETT joined. After issuing an opinion in this certified question proceeding, we granted respondents’ motion for rehearing and heard reargument of the case. Petitioner sold the real property at issue and we abated our proceeding to allow the certifying court, the

Mr. Justice CURTIS dissenting. I dissent from the opinion pronounced by the Chief Justice,” afid from the judgment which the majority of. the court'think it proper to render in this ■ case. The plaintiff alleged, in his declaration, that he was a citizen of the State of Missouri, and that the' defendant was a citizen of the State-of New York. ■ It "is not doubted that it was necessary to make each of these' allega