Cases

JONES, Bankruptcy Judge, dissenting: The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel issued a clear mandate to the bankruptcy court with “instructions to enter default judgment in favor of American Express, holding the debt of $24,812.84 nondischargeable under Section 523(a)(2)(A).” In my view, the Mandate Rule precludes the bankruptcy court from acting in a manner inconsistent with these instructions. Because this Panel holds

NO. 07-08-0065-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL B DECEMBER 30, 2008 ______________________________ ELIZABETH C. BRENT, APPELLANT v. MARTHA C.

NO. 07-08-0065-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL B DECEMBER 30, 2008 ______________________________ ELIZABETH C.

No. 1 February 3, 2022 1 IN THE OREGON TAX COURT REGULAR DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Plaintiff, v. James WAKEFIELD, Defendant. (TC 5404) On cross-motions for partial summary judgment, the Department o

85 Cal.Rptr.2d 459 (1999) 72 Cal.App.4th 798 Stanford HORN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD WESTERN, INC., Defendant and Respondent. No. A079626. Court of Appeal, First District, Division Two. May 6, 1999. Rehearing Denied June 7, 1999. Review Denied July 28, 1999.

49 F.Supp.2d 709 (1999) RODIN PROPERTIES-SHORE MALL, N.V., Plaintiff, v. CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC., Cushman & Wakefield, Inc., and Neal Rodin, Defendants. Neal Rodin, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. ABN AMRO Bank, N.V., ABN AMRO Holding, N.V., Stichting Bedrijfspensioenfonds Voor De Metaalindustrie, Stichting Pensioenfonds Rabobankorganisatie, Amev Levensverzekering, N.V., and Centraal Beheer Pensioenverzekering, N.V

HILL v. AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE Skip to Main Content Accessibility Statement Help Contact Us

498 F.Supp.2d 150 (2007) EMERGENCY COALITION TO DEFEND EDUCATIONAL TRAVEL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF the TREASURY, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-1215(ESH). United States District Court, District of Columbia. July 30, 2007. *151 *152 John T. Riely, Bethesda, M

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 16-930V (to be published) ************************* KIRA HUGHES, * Chief Special Master Corcoran * * Petitioner, * *

SELYA, Senior Circuit Judge. When the plaintiffs in this case purchased nonrefundable airline tickets that they ultimately were unable to use, they received no payback of any kind. In the lawsuit that followed, they conceded that they were correctly denied any refund of their base fares but' accused the airlines of unlawfully failing to refund various fees and taxes that had been

54 S.W.3d 401 (2001) John T. ASH, Bill Snider, George L. Betros and Stacy Joe Ash, Appellants, v. HACK BRANCH DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, INC. and Dudley Haas Distributing Company, Inc., Appellees. No. 10-99-322-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco. August 1, 2001. *405 James R. Dunnam, Dunnam & Dunnam, L.L.P., Waco, for appellants.

ACCEPTED 15-25-00109-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/23/2025 5:08 PM NO. __-__-______-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: August 31, 2017 1 Refiled in Redacted Form: February 7, 2018 PUBLISHED J.M. and V.M., in their Own Right and as Best Friends of their Son, V.J.M., No. 02-10V Petitioners, Chief Special Ma

Price v BFP Tower C Co., LLC (2023 NY Slip Op 02338) Price v BFP Tower C Co., LLC 2023 NY Slip Op 02338 Decided on May 3, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE __________________________________________ ) In re: TRANSPERFECT GLOBAL, INC. ) C.A. No. 9700-CB __________________________________________) ) ELIZABETH ELTING, ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 10449-CB

FAIRCHILD, Senior Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs appeal the vacating of a civil contempt order issued against the president of defendant corporation for failure to comply with an injunction directed to defendant and its officers. The appeal raises the questions whether there was sufficient service of the summons on defendant and whether there was sufficient service of the civil contempt motion on the president.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-17-00553-CV Christopher Caviness, Appellant v. High Profile Promotions, Inc., Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 419TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-14-000655, HONORABLE TODD T. WONG, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM

OPINION Justice ROBINSON, for the Court. This case is a federal maritime action 1 in which Jody King, the plaintiff, raised claims for maintenance and cure; negligence under the federal Jones Act, as codified in 46 U.S.C. § 30104; and “breach of the warranty of seaworthiness.”

Chief Justice RABNER, concurring. By order dated September 8, 2010, the Presiding Judge for Administration of the Appellate Division, the Honorable Edwin H. Stern, was temporarily assigned to the Supreme Court until further order. As a result, he participated in the resolution of this matter and authored the majority opinion. Article VI, Section II, Paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constituti

ACCEPTED 01-14-00880-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/25/2015 3:28:27 PM