Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “American Home Funding, Inc. v. Goldberg”
ORDER WILEY Y. DANIEL, Chief Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Security Service Federal Credit Union’s Amended Motion For Reconsideration Of The District Court’s March 21 Order Regarding Choice of Law [ECF No. 742], filed on April 2, 2012. BACKGROUND On July 18, 2011, Security Service Federal Credit Union (“SSFCU”) filed a fourth-amended compl
ORDER WILEY Y. DANIEL, Chief Judge. This matter is before the Court on the following three motions: (1) Defendant Orange Coast Title Company of Southern California’s (OCT) Motion for Hearing/Conference re Choice of Law [ECF No. 690], filed August 12, 2011; (2) Defendant Stewart Title of California, Ine.’s (STC) Motion for Determination of Applicable Law [ECF No. 691], filed August 15, 2011; and (3) Def
Castrillo v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.public domain
670 F.Supp.2d 516 (2009) Michael Paul CASTRILLO v. AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee for Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust Inc., Asset-Backed Pass-through Certificates, Series 2005-OPT4. Civil Action No.: 09-4369. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. November 16, 2009. *520 Michael Pau
United States v. American Home Assurance Co.public domain
OPINION GOLDBERG, Senior Judge: Plaintiff the United States (“the United States” or “the government”) commenced this action to recover unpaid antidumping duties plus pre- and postjudgment interest from surety Defendant American Home Assurance Company (“AHAC”). Following cross-motions for summary judgment, the court held AHAC liable for th
United States v. American Home Assurance Co.public domain
OPINION GOLDBERG, Senior Judge: This case is before the court on competing cross-motions for summary judgment. In this action on a bond, Plaintiff, the United States (“United States” or “the Government”), seeks recovery of unpaid antidumping duties from surety Defendant American Home Assurance Company (“AHAC”). The parties dispute (1) whe
35 Cal.Rptr.3d 31 (2005) 133 Cal.App.4th 658 PEREGRINE FUNDING, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP, Defendant and Appellant. No. A104481. Court of Appeal, First District, Division Three. October 19, 2005. *35 Rogers Joseph O'Donnell & Phillips, Pamela
Dilworth v. Goldbergpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge. Anthony Dilworth (“Dilworth”) and Patricia Dilworth (“Patricia”) (together, “the Dilworths” or “plaintiffs”) have brought this action arising out of Dilworth’s confinement in the Westchester County Jail (the “WCJ”). They allege various federal and state claims against New York Medical College (“NYMC”), Westchester County,
Carrillo v. Goldbergpublic domain
*302 Opinion GRUENDEL, J. The plaintiffs, Luis Carrillo and Sandra Carrillo, appeal from the judgment of the trial court awarding them damages and interest for the failure of the defendants, Keith Goldberg and Leigh Ann Goldberg, to return their security deposit upon the termination of their lease in violation of General Statutes § 47 a-21 (d
STEIN, J.: *745**522In these appeals stemming from four residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) transactions, we are asked to decide whether claims for general contract damages based on alleged breaches of a "no untrue statement" provision can with
Pfeifer v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.public domain
*1255Opinion LAMBDEN, J. Allen Pfeifer (Allen) and Florence A. Pfeifer (Florence), a son and his mother (collectively, the Pfeifers), have a mortgage insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA). They filed a third amended complaint against Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (Countrywide), and ReconTrust Company (Recon) after a nonjudicial foreclosur
Ojeda v. Goldbergpublic domain
599 F.3d 712 (2010) Ernest J. OJEDA and Beverly V. Ojeda, Defendants-Appellants, v. Gail GOLDBERG, Plaintiff-Appellee. No. 09-2008. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued November 30, 2009. Decided March 25, 2010. *714 Paul M. Bauch (argued), Chicago, IL, for Defendants-Appellants. Stuart
Image Masters, Inc. v. Chase Home Financepublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION GOLDBERG, District Judge. This bankruptcy appeal stems from a $65 million Ponzi scheme perpetrated by Wesley Snyder through his then-existing company, Image Masters, Inc. (“Image Masters”). After the collapse of that scheme, Lynn E. Feldman, the Chapter 7 Trustee for the bankruptcy estates of Image Masters and related entities (collectively, “Debtors”), commenced two adversar
Goldberg v. Ojedapublic domain
417 B.R. 59 (2009) Gail GOLDBERG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ernest J. OJEDA and Beverly V. Ojeda, Defendants-Appellees. No. 08 C 2808. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 17, 2009. *61 Stuart Michael Gimbel, Alon Stein, Joseph L. Matz, Kamensky Rubenstein Hochiman & Delott LLP, Lincolnwood, IL,
Brown v. American Home Products Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND PRETRIAL ORDER NO. BARTLE, District Judge. The issue before the court is whether the Seventh Amendment to the Nationwide Class *501Action Settlement Agreement (“Settlement Agreement”) involving Wyeth’s1 diet drugs Pondimin and Redux is fair, adequate, and reasonable. We gave
In re American Apparel, Inc.public domain
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge. This is a consolidated putative securities class action against defendants American Apparel, Inc., Dov Charney, Adrian Kowalewski, and Lion Capital, Inc. Plaintiffs’ primary allegation is that during the class period, defendants misled the public about its hiring of workers employed in American Apparel’s Los Angeles factory.
Goldberg v. UBS AGpublic domain
690 F.Supp.2d 92 (2010) Karen GOLDBERG, Chana Goldberg, Esther Goldberg, Yitzhak Goldberg, Shoshana Goldberg, Eliezer Goldberg, Yaakov Moshe Goldberg and Tzvi Yehoshua Goldberg, Plaintiffs, v. UBS AG, Defendant. Civil Action No. CV-08-375(DGT). United States District Court, E.D. New York. March 5, 2010. *94 Aaron Schlanger, Gary
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GEORGE B. DANIELS, District Judge: Plaintiff Mitre Sports International Limited (“Mitre”) commenced this action against Defendant Home Box Office, Inc. (“HBO”), alleging that Defendant’s distribution of a portion of “Real Sports With Bryan Gumbel Episode # 138” entitled “Children of the Industry” (“COI”) on September 16, 2008 defamed Plaintiff by falsely portraying
Jackson v. McKAY-DAVIS FUNERAL HOME, INC.public domain
717 F.Supp.2d 809 (2010) Marlenea JACKSON and Erica Jackson (a minor), Plaintiffs, v. McKAY-DAVIS FUNERAL HOME, INC., Oklahoma Wilbert Vaults, DHL Express (USA), Inc., Travelers Insurance Company, Hartford Casualty Ins. Co., Defendants. Case No. 07-C-1037. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. June 3, 2010. *810 Ian T. Ma
American Legion v. American Humanist Assn.public domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2018 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Ti
Goldberg v. 401 North Wabash Venture LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AMY J. ST. EVE, District Judge: This action arises out of a dispute over the sale of two hotel condominium units in the Trump International Hotel and Tower in Chicago, Illinois. The Plaintiff, Jacqueline Goldberg, alleges that the Defendants — 401 North Wabash Venture LLC and Trump Chicago Managing Member LLC — “lured her into signing” agreements to purchase two units