Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “American States Ins. Co. v. Insurance Co. of the State of Pennsylvania”
Am. States Ins. Co. v. Ins. Co. of Pa.public domain
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On March 23, 2016, this Court issued its Memorandum and Order (ECF No. 156) granting the Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 85) filed by Plaintiff American States Insurance Company ("American States" or "American") on grounds that Defendant Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania ("ICSOP") had a primary duty to defend its insured, Sierra Pacific Industries ("Sierra"), i
Ins. Co. of Pa. v. Am. Safety Indem. Co.public domain
GRIMES, J. *902SUMMARY This is a dispute between insurers. Under Insurance Code section 11580 ( section 11580 ), when a judgment is obtained against an insured based upon property damage, the judgment creditor may bring an action on the policy against the insurer, to recover on the judgment. Here, plaintiff's in
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Melvin S. Hoffman, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Kathleen P. Dwyer, the chapter 7 trustee of the estate of Pihl, Inc., the debtor in the main case, initiated this adversary proceeding by filing a six-count complaint against the Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (“ICSP”) and American International Companies (“AIC,” and collectively with ICSP, the “Sureties”) seeking to set aside an
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE ■ This action proceeds on' the first and fourth claim for relief in-Plaintiff American States Insurance Company’s (“Plaintiff’) Corrected Third Amended Complaint. In the first claim for relief, Plaintiff requests that the Court declare that Defendant Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (“Defendant”) had an independent duty to defend
Zurich Am. Ins. Co. v Insurance Co. of the State of Pa. (2022 NY Slip Op 05822) Zurich Am. Ins. Co. v Insurance Co. of the State of Pa. 2022 NY Slip Op 05822 Decided on October 18, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by Ne
Zurich Am. Ins. Co. v Insurance Co. of the State of Pa. (2022 NY Slip Op 05822) Zurich Am. Ins. Co. v Insurance Co. of the State of Pa. 2022 NY Slip Op 05822 Decided on October 18, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by Ne
*1225ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On March 23, 2016, this Court issued its Memorandum and Order (ECF No. 156) granting Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 85) on grounds that Defendant Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (“ICSOP”) had a primary duty to defend its insured, Sierra Pacific Indust
OPINION VANASKIE, Circuit Judge. Decades of litigation over the effects of pervasive .asbestos use have yielded a financial burden borne across an array of industries. Today we must decide which of two companies will bear costs associated with a staggering number of asbestos claims. These companies — a historical manufacturer of asbestos-containing produc
Cont'l Ins. Co. v. Honeywell Int'l, Inc.public domain
JUSTICE LaVECCHIA delivered the opinion of the Court. *304**33This appeal involves questions about the insurance coverage available to defendant Honeywell International, Inc. (Honeywell), a New Jersey based corporation, for thousands of bodily-injury claims
Consol. Rail Corp. v. ACE Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.public domain
PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 22nd day of August, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED. Joint Application to File Reproduced Record Under Seal and the Application of Respondent Continental Insurance Company To Seal Information Filed Under Seal in Trial Court are DENIED.
OPINION2 Brendan Linehan Shannon, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge Before the Court is the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (the “Motion”) [Adv. Docket No. 59] filed by the Chapter 7 Trustee for the Estate of WL Homes, LLC. The Trustee contends that he is entitled to turnover of approximately $2.2 million in insurance premium overpay-ments—called a “return premium”—from Zu
Sioux Steel Company v. Ins. Co. of the State of PApublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-1121 ___________________________ Sioux Steel Company, a South Dakota corporation Plaintiff - Appellant v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania
American States Ins. Co. v Graphic Arts Mut. Ins. Co. (2021 NY Slip Op 02485) American States Ins. Co. v Graphic Arts Mut. Ins. Co. 2021 NY Slip Op 02485 Decided on April 27, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Pu
American States Ins. Co. v Graphic Arts Mut. Ins. Co. (2021 NY Slip Op 02485) American States Ins. Co. v Graphic Arts Mut. Ins. Co. 2021 NY Slip Op 02485 Decided on April 27, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Pu
117 Cal.Rptr.2d 427 (2002) 97 Cal.App.4th 387 AEROJET-GENERAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. AMERICAN EXCESS INSURANCE CO. et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. C030874. Court of Appeal, Third District. February 28, 2002. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing April 2, 2002. Review Denied May 22, 2002.[*]
****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o
ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Tudor Insurance Company (“Tudor”) brought suit against American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania (“American Casualty”), seeking contribution for a claim that Tudor paid to settle a state court lawsuit on behalf of a mutual insured, Strategic Management Partners, LLC (“SMP”). See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a).1
20-3559-cv The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. Equitas Insurance Limited UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2022 Argued: December 1, 2022 Decided: May 22, 2023 Docket No. 20-3559-cv THE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA,
American Empire Surplus Lines Ins. Co. v Commerce & Indus. Ins. Co. (2023 NY Slip Op 06197) American Empire Surplus Lines Ins. Co. v Commerce & Indus. Ins. Co. 2023 NY Slip Op 06197 Decided on November 30, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department
OPINION JOSEPH H. YOUNG, Senior District Judge: I. Fidelity Savings and Loan Association (Fidelity) was a mutual savings and loan association organized under the laws of the United States, chartered by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FHLBB), and located in Baltimore, Maryland. Fidelity’s deposits were insured by the Federal Savings and Loan