⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “American States Ins. Co. v. Insurance Co. of the State of Pennsylvania”

District Court, E.D. California · 2018-03-29 · Published · cited 0× · 305 F. Supp. 3d 1094
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On March 23, 2016, this Court issued its Memorandum and Order (ECF No. 156) granting the Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 85) filed by Plaintiff American States Insurance Company ("American States" or "American") on grounds that Defendant Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania ("ICSOP") had a primary duty to defend its insured, Sierra Pacific Industries ("Sierra"), i
California Court of Appeal, 5th District · 2019-03-01 · Published · cited 9× · 244 Cal. Rptr. 3d 310; 32 Cal. App. 5th 898
GRIMES, J. *902SUMMARY This is a dispute between insurers. Under Insurance Code section 11580 ( section 11580 ), when a judgment is obtained against an insured based upon property damage, the judgment creditor may bring an action on the policy against the insurer, to recover on the judgment. Here, plaintiff's in
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016-09-26 · Published · cited 3× · 560 B.R. 1; 76 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 671; 2016 Bankr. LEXIS 3482
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Melvin S. Hoffman, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Kathleen P. Dwyer, the chapter 7 trustee of the estate of Pihl, Inc., the debtor in the main case, initiated this adversary proceeding by filing a six-count complaint against the Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (“ICSP”) and American International Companies (“AIC,” and collectively with ICSP, the “Sureties”) seeking to set aside an
District Court, E.D. California · 2016-03-23 · Published · cited 2× · 173 F. Supp. 3d 982; 2016 WL 1138142; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38128
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE ■ This action proceeds on' the first and fourth claim for relief in-Plaintiff American States Insurance Company’s (“Plaintiff’) Corrected Third Amended Complaint. In the first claim for relief, Plaintiff requests that the Court declare that Defendant Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (“Defendant”) had an independent duty to defend
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022-10-18 · Published · cited 1× · 2022 NY Slip Op 05822
Zurich Am. Ins. Co. v Insurance Co. of the State of Pa. (2022 NY Slip Op 05822) Zurich Am. Ins. Co. v Insurance Co. of the State of Pa. 2022 NY Slip Op 05822 Decided on October 18, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by Ne
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022-10-18 · Published · cited 1× · 2022 NY Slip Op 05822
Zurich Am. Ins. Co. v Insurance Co. of the State of Pa. (2022 NY Slip Op 05822) Zurich Am. Ins. Co. v Insurance Co. of the State of Pa. 2022 NY Slip Op 05822 Decided on October 18, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by Ne
District Court, E.D. California · 2017-03-28 · Published · cited 3× · 245 F. Supp. 3d 1224
*1225ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On March 23, 2016, this Court issued its Memorandum and Order (ECF No. 156) granting Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 85) on grounds that Defendant Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (“ICSOP”) had a primary duty to defend its insured, Sierra Pacific Indust
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017-04-21 · Published · cited 53× · 855 F.3d 152; 2017 WL 1416364; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 6984
OPINION VANASKIE, Circuit Judge. Decades of litigation over the effects of pervasive .asbestos use have yielded a financial burden borne across an array of industries. Today we must decide which of two companies will bear costs associated with a staggering number of asbestos claims. These companies — a historical manufacturer of asbestos-containing produc
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2018-06-27 · Published · cited 29× · 188 A.3d 297; 234 N.J. 23
JUSTICE LaVECCHIA delivered the opinion of the Court. *304**33This appeal involves questions about the insurance coverage available to defendant Honeywell International, Inc. (Honeywell), a New Jersey based corporation, for thousands of bodily-injury claims
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018-08-22 · Published · cited 2× · 191 A.3d 1288
PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 22nd day of August, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED. Joint Application to File Reproduced Record Under Seal and the Application of Respondent Continental Insurance Company To Seal Information Filed Under Seal in Trial Court are DENIED.
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2017-01-10 · Published · cited 0× · 563 B.R. 512; 2017 Bankr. LEXIS 58; 63 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 152
OPINION2 Brendan Linehan Shannon, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge Before the Court is the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (the “Motion”) [Adv. Docket No. 59] filed by the Chapter 7 Trustee for the Estate of WL Homes, LLC. The Trustee contends that he is entitled to turnover of approximately $2.2 million in insurance premium overpay-ments—called a “return premium”—from Zu
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2025-02-06 · Published · cited 2× · 127 F.4th 1113
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-1121 ___________________________ Sioux Steel Company, a South Dakota corporation Plaintiff - Appellant v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-04-27 · Published · cited 1× · 2021 NY Slip Op 02485
American States Ins. Co. v Graphic Arts Mut. Ins. Co. (2021 NY Slip Op 02485) American States Ins. Co. v Graphic Arts Mut. Ins. Co. 2021 NY Slip Op 02485 Decided on April 27, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Pu
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-04-27 · Published · cited 1× · 2021 NY Slip Op 02485
American States Ins. Co. v Graphic Arts Mut. Ins. Co. (2021 NY Slip Op 02485) American States Ins. Co. v Graphic Arts Mut. Ins. Co. 2021 NY Slip Op 02485 Decided on April 27, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Pu
California Court of Appeal · 2002-04-02 · Published · cited 31× · 117 Cal. Rptr. 2d 427; 97 Cal. App. 4th 387
117 Cal.Rptr.2d 427 (2002) 97 Cal.App.4th 387 AEROJET-GENERAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. AMERICAN EXCESS INSURANCE CO. et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. C030874. Court of Appeal, Third District. February 28, 2002. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing April 2, 2002. Review Denied May 22, 2002.[*]
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2014-12-16 · Published · cited 0×
****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o
District Court, N.D. Florida · 2017-03-31 · Published · cited 0× · 274 F. Supp. 3d 1278
ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Tudor Insurance Company (“Tudor”) brought suit against American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania (“American Casualty”), seeking contribution for a claim that Tudor paid to settle a state court lawsuit on behalf of a mutual insured, Strategic Management Partners, LLC (“SMP”). See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a).1
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023-05-22 · Published · cited 0×
20-3559-cv The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. Equitas Insurance Limited UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2022 Argued: December 1, 2022 Decided: May 22, 2023 Docket No. 20-3559-cv THE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA,
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023-11-30 · Published · cited 0× · 221 A.D.3d 559; 199 N.Y.S.3d 486; 2023 NY Slip Op 06197
American Empire Surplus Lines Ins. Co. v Commerce & Indus. Ins. Co. (2023 NY Slip Op 06197) American Empire Surplus Lines Ins. Co. v Commerce & Indus. Ins. Co. 2023 NY Slip Op 06197 Decided on November 30, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993-01-04 · Published · cited 0× · 995 F.2d 471
OPINION JOSEPH H. YOUNG, Senior District Judge: I. Fidelity Savings and Loan Association (Fidelity) was a mutual savings and loan association organized under the laws of the United States, chartered by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FHLBB), and located in Baltimore, Maryland. Fidelity’s deposits were insured by the Federal Savings and Loan