⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “American Wild Horse Campaign v. Bernhardt”

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020-07-02 · Published · cited 14× · 963 F.3d 1001
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT AMERICAN WILD HORSE No. 18-17403 CAMPAIGN; KIMERLEE CURYL, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 3:18-cv-00059-LRH- CBC v. DAVID BERNHARDT, OPINION Secretary of the Department of the Interior; MICHAEL D.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2020-02-13 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN WILD HORSE CAMPAIGN, et al., Civil Action No. 18-1529 (BAH) Plaintiffs, Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell v. DAVID BERNHARDT, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPIN
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-04-17 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN WILD HORSE CAMPAIGN, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 22-2971 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, Defendant.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2024-08-26 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN WILD HORSE CAMPAIGN, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 22-cv-3061 (CRC) UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff American Wild Horse Campaign (“AWHC”) submitted a Freedom of Information Act
District Court, District of Columbia · 2026-01-28 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN WILD HORSE CAMPAIGN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 22-2972 (RDM) UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff American Wild Horse Campaign (“Campaign”) brings this Freedom of Informati
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023-09-12 · Published · cited 4× · 82 F.4th 624
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE, a non- No. 22-16483 profit corporation, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 1:22-cv-00710- AWI-EPG v. CICELY MULDOON, in her official OPINION capacity as Superintendent of Yosemite National Park; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR; UNITED STATES NATIONAL PARK S
District Court, District of Columbia · 2021-08-30 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ASCENSION BORGESS HOSPITAL, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 20-139 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell XAVIER BECERRA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant.
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2022-08-01 · Published · cited 2× · 280 A.3d 212; 480 Md. 167
The Town of Upper Marlboro v. The Prince George’s County Council, No. 55 September 2021 Term. Opinion by Hotten, J. LAND USE – JUDICIAL REVIEW – FINAL AGENCY ACTIONS Generally, an agency action is appealable only if it is final. An agency action is final when it decides all questions of law and fact and leaves nothing further for the agency to decide. Willis v. Montgomery Cty., 415 Md. 523, 534‒35, 3 A.3d 448, 455–56 (2010). Prince George’s County Council (“the Council”) passed a resolution, C
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022-04-18 · Published · cited 10× · 31 F.4th 1157
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, No. 21-35030 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. Nos. and 3:17-cv-00013-SLG 3:17-cv-00014-SLG STATE OF ALASKA, Plaintiff, v. DEBRA HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of the Interior; MIT
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2022-08-26 · Published · cited 0×
Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc., et al. v. CREG Westport Developers I, LLC, et al., No. 53, September Term, 2021, Opinion by Booth, J. MARYLAND FOREST CONSERVATION ACT—FINAL DECISION FOR PURPOSES OF JUDICIAL REVIEW The Maryland Forest Conservation Act, Maryland Code (2018 Repl. Vol., 2021 Supp.), Natural Resources Article § 5-1601, et seq. (the “Act”) establishes the requirements for the adoption and implementation of a forest conservation program by local governments having planning and zoni
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2022-08-26 · Published · cited 3× · 481 Md. 325
Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc., et al. v. CREG Westport Developers I, LLC, et al., No. 53, September Term, 2021, Opinion by Booth, J. MARYLAND FOREST CONSERVATION ACT—FINAL DECISION FOR PURPOSES OF JUDICIAL REVIEW The Maryland Forest Conservation Act, Maryland Code (2018 Repl. Vol., 2021 Supp.), Natural Resources Article § 5-1601, et seq. (the “Act”) establishes the requirements for the adoption and implementation of a forest conservation program by local governments having planning and zoni
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026-01-14 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FRIENDS OF ANIMALS, No. 24-5786 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:22-cv-00365- ART-CLB v. DOUG BURGUM, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior; OPINION UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, an Agency of t
District Court, District of Columbia · 2020-04-21 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _______________________________________ ) GULF RESTORATION NETWORK, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. )
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023-02-24 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CENTER FOR COMMUNITY No. 20-70272 ACTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE; SIERRA CLUB; TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932; ORDER AND SHANA SATERS; MARTHA AMENDED ROMERO, OPINION Petitioners, v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION; STEPHEN M. DICKSON, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Federal Avia
District Court, District of Columbia · 2021-05-21 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STANDING ROCK SIOUX TRIBE, et al., Plaintiffs, and CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE, et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. Civil Action No. 16-1534 (JEB) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, Defendant, and DAKOTA ACCESS, LLC, Defendant-Intervenor. MEMO
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021-11-18 · Published · cited 8× · 61 F.4th 633
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ACTION No. 20-70272 AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE; SIERRA CLUB; TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932; SHANA SATERS; MARTHA ROMERO, Petitioners, v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION; STEPHEN M. DICKSON, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, Respondents, EASTGATE BLDG 1, LLC; SAN
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019-12-31 · Published · cited 26× · 946 F.3d 1138
PUBLISH FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT December 31, 2019 _________________________________
District Court, District of Columbia · 2024-03-30 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FRIENDS OF ANIMALS, Plaintiff, v. U.S. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, Civil Action No. 18-2029 (RDM) Defendant, STATE OF UTAH, Defendant-Intervenor. MEMORANDUM OPINION The Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act (“WHA” or the “Act”), 16 U.S.C. §
Haaland v. Brackeenpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2023-06-15 · Published · cited 102× · 599 U.S. 255
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2022 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-12-17 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS : ALLIANCE, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE