Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Amy Ann Williams”
State v. Williamspublic domain
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st of February 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of May 2017."
Mark C. Williams v. Amy Minton Williamspublic domain
Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Date: Cite as 2020 Ark. App. 204 2021-06-16 10:37:50 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS Foxit PhantomPDF DIVISION IV Version: 9.7.5 No. CV-19-163 Opinion Delivered April 1, 2020 MARK C. WILLIAMS APPEAL FROM THE BAXTER
Benge v. Williamspublic domain
Chief Justice Hecht delivered the opinion of the Court. At the trial of this healthcare-liability case, the patient argued and offered evidence *468that her physician was negligent both in using an inexperienced resident to assist with performing her surgery and in not disclosing the resident's level of involvement, although she does not clai
in Re Amy Williamspublic domain
ACCEPTED 01-15-00685-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 8/1
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 18, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D21-2238 Lower Tribunal No. 20-3751 ________________ John Taulbee and Ann Taulbee, etc., Appellants,
Williams v. Angie's List, Inc.public domain
ENTRY ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION OF COLLECTIVE ACTION Hon. William T. Lawrence, Judge This cause is before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Conditional Certification of Collective Action and Court-Authorized Notice Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) (Dkt. No. 15). This motion is fully briefed, and the Court, being duly advised, DENIES the motion for the reasons, and to the exten
Jo Ann Howard and Associates v. National City Bankpublic domain
COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. PNC Bank appeals a jury verdict in favor of special deputy receiver Jo Ann Howard and Associates, P.C., and a group of state guaranty associations (together, Appellees). The jury found PNC liable for negligence and breach of fiduciary duty in violation of its duties as trustee of various preneed trusts created by National Prearranged Services, Inc. On ap
Commonwealth v. Williamspublic domain
980 A.2d 510 (2009) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Craig WILLIAMS, Appellant. No. 514 CAP Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted June 3, 2008. Decided October 2, 2009. *513 Teri B. Himebaugh, Esq., Barbara Ann McDermott, Esq., Schwenksville, for Craig Williams. Hugh J. Burns, Esq., Amy Zapp, E
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Securitypublic domain
PER CURIAM: Charolette A. Williams filed an application for disability insurance benefits with the Commissioner of Social Security; an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) denied the application; and the district court affirmed the ALJ’s denial. Williams, proceeding pro se, now appeals the district court’s decision. She argues that (1) the ALJ erred in rejecting the medical opinion of her treating physician, Dr. Ashraf Hanna, and (2
Jo Ann Howard & Associates, P.C. v. Cassitypublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER E. RICHARD WEBBER, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ First Amended Bill of Costs [ECF No. 2398]. *1076I. BACKGROUND This litigation arose out of proceedings instituted by the Texas Department' of In-surancé in Travis County, Texas, i
Jo Ann Howard & Associates, P.C. v. Cassitypublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER E. RICHARD WEBBER, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter comes before the Court on PNC Bank’s Motion for New Trial Based on Legal and Evidentiary Errors [ECF No. 2385]. I. STANDARD1 Following a jury trial resulting in an adverse judgment, a party may move for a new trial under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59
Commonwealth v. Williamspublic domain
936 A.2d 12 (2007) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Christopher WILLIAMS, Appellee/Cross-Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted December 27, 2004. Decided November 26, 2007. *14 Hugh J. Burns, Esq., Amy Zapp, Esq., Philadelphia, for Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Victor J. Abreu, Jr.,
Jo Ann Howard & Associates, P.C. v. Cassitypublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER E. RICHARD WEBBER, Senior District Judge. This matter comes before the Court upon “Defendants National City Bank, U.S. Bank, National Association, and BMO Harris Bank’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment”1 [ECF No. 1761] and “Defendants National City Bank and U.S. Bank, National Association’s Joinder in Part in BMO Harris Bank’s Motion for Part
Jo Ann Howard & Associates, P.C. v. Cassitypublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER E. RICHARD WEBBER, Senior District Judge. This matter comes before the court upon “National City’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents” [ECF No. 1682]. In their Motion to Compel, Defendant National City requests the Court compel the production of settlement documents and communications from Plaintiffs [ECF No. 1682], National City requested from Plaint
Smith, Amy Ann v. Statepublic domain
In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Amy Bryant v. Jim Woodallpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1685 AMY BRYANT, M.D., On behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions; BEVERLY GRAY, M.D., On behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions; ELIZABETH DEANS, M.D., On behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions; PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC, On behalf o
Williams v. Tyson Foods, Inc.public domain
732 F.Supp.2d 1363 (2010) In re TYSON FOODS, INC., Fair Labor Standards Act Litigation. Williams v. Tyson Foods, Inc. MDL Docket No. 1854. Case Nos. 4:07-MD-1854 (CDL), 1:07-CV-93 (CDL). United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Columbus Division. August 5, 2010. *1364 Ann K. Wiggins, Candis A. McGowan, Robert F. Childs, Jr., Rober
Patricia Webber and Harold Holmes v. Amy Williamspublic domain
OPINION ELSA ALCALA, Justice. Appellant, Harold Holmes, appeals a judgment in favor of appellee, Amy Williams, determining and rendering judgment for child-support arrearages, including accrued interest, and ordering that Williams be entitled to issue child-support liens, levies, and writs of income withholding as remedies for the collection of unpaid child
Amy Frogge v. Shawn Josephpublic domain
06/20/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 3, 2021 Session AMY FROGGE, ET AL. v. SHAWN JOSEPH, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 20-420-III Ellen Hobbs Lyle, Chancellor _________________________________
Amy Bryant v. Jim Woodallpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1685 AMY BRYANT, M.D., On behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions; BEVERLY GRAY, M.D., On behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions; ELIZABETH DEANS, M.D., On behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions; PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC, On behalf o