Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
13 opinions for “Ana Hernandez-Yanks”
Florida Barpublic domain
PER CURIAM. We have for review the referee’s report recommending that Ana Hernandez-Yanks be reinstated to The Florida Bar (the Bar). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. We approve the report. The referee made the following findings of fact concerning Hernandez-Yanks’ petition for reinstatement: 1. Petitioner is thirty-three years old, married and the mother of
In Re Uniq Shoes Corp.public domain
316 B.R. 748 (2004) In re UNIQ SHOES CORPORATION, Debtor. No. 03-42420-BKC-AJC. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. November 3, 2004. *749 Ana Hernandez-Yanks, Miami, FL, for Debtors. Rodolfo Pittaluga, Holland & Knight, Miami, FL, for Creditor/Landlord. MEMORANDUM DECISION DENYING UNIQ SHOES CORPORATION MO
Hoskins v. Yanks (In Re Yanks)public domain
100 B.R. 595 (1989) In re Barry Stephen YANKS, Debtor. Martha HOSKINS, as personal representative of the Estate of Eddie H. Hoskins, deceased, Appellant, v. Barry S. YANKS, Appellee. No. 89-0274. United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. May 31, 1989. *596 Joel V. Lumer, Miami, Fla., for appellant. An
Bankr. L. Rep. P 73,972 in Re Barry Stephens Yanks, Debtor. Martha Hoskins v. Barry Stephens Yankspublic domain
PER CURIAM: Appellant Hoskins filed this complaint to prevent the discharge of a debt owed by appellee Yanks. ■ In 1975, Hoskins’ late husband sued Yanks in a Florida court for the tort of defamation, alleging that Yanks had maliciously published a defamatory statement about Mr. Hoskins, or, in the alternative, that malice was implied by law. The jury returned a verdict in fav
McKenzie v. Laventure (In re McKenzie)public domain
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ LAURENT AND WILMA LAVEN-TURE MOTION TO DISMISS A. JAY CRISTOL, Bankruptcy Judge. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Defendants’, Laurent R. Laven-ture and Wilma S. Laventure, Motion to Dismiss the Adversary Complaint. The Court having read and reviewed the Motion, the Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction based on Res Judicata
McKenzie v. Laventure (In re McKenzie)public domain
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS, LAURENT R. AND WILMA S. LA-VENTURE, MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED ADVERSARY COMPLAINT A. JAY CRISTOL, Bankruptcy Judge. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Defendants, LAURENT R. LA-VENTURE and WILMA S. LAVENTURE, motion to Dismiss the Amended Adversary Complaint. The Court having read and reviewed the Motion and Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss fo
Homestead Savings v. Ozark Financial Corp.public domain
699 F.Supp. 1547 (1988) HOMESTEAD SAVINGS, a Federal Savings and Loan Association, Plaintiff, v. OZARK FINANCIAL CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, et al., Defendants. No. 87-2322-Civ-JLK. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. October 28, 1988. *1548 Ana Hernandez-Yanks, Miami, Fla., for Barry Yanks. Goldstein &
Hoskins v. Yanks (In Re Yanks)public domain
95 B.R. 234 (1989) In re Barry Stephen YANKS, Debtor. Martha HOSKINS as personal representative of the Estate of Eddie H. Hoskins, Deceased Plaintiff, v. Barry Stephen YANKS, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 88-03050-BKC-SMW, Adv. No. 88-0526-BKC-SMW-A. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. January 12, 1989. *235 Joel V. Lum
Ciolino v. Eastmanpublic domain
MEMORANDUM & ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BURROUGHS, DISTRICT JUDGE. I. INTRODUCTION On the evening of June 30, 2013, while attending the annual St. Peter’s Festival in Gloucester, Massachusetts, Plaintiff Alfonso Ciolino (“Mr. Ciolino”) was arrested by officers of the Essex County Sheriffs Department and the Gloucester Police Department. Mr. Ciolino, along with his
People v. Najerapublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 214 OPINION INTRODUCTION Defendant Abimael Flores Najera was charged with the first degree murder of Victor Hernandez. The jury convicted Najera of second degree murder, and the trial court sentenced him to an indeterminate term of 15 years to life. Najera contends the convicti
United States v. Pineda-Dovalpublic domain
614 F.3d 1019 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adan PINEDA-DOVAL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-10240. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted November 2, 2009. Filed August 10, 2010. *1022 Jon M. Sands, Federal Public Defender, and Daniel L. Kaplan, Assistant Fede
Elliott v. Statepublic domain
972 A.2d 354 (2009) 185 Md. App. 692 Andre Jerome ELLIOTT v. STATE of Maryland. No. 1963 September Term, 2007. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. June 1, 2009. *357 Robert M. Cary and Katherine M. Turner (David M. Zinn, Williams & Connolly, LLP, on the brief), Washington, DC; (Public Defender Specia
United States v. Reesepublic domain
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted appellants of federal civil rights crimes stemming from their actions as Oakland Housing Authority police officers. Their appeals raise a number of difficult questions, among them certain matters of first impression. We are required to decide what the government must prove to convict a law enforcement officer of depriving an individual of his federal constitutional right to be fre