Cases

JUSTICE HASSELL delivered the opinion of the Court. I. In this appeal of a judgment entered in favor of a plaintiff against a defendant in an action for fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of contract, we consider whether the plaintiff introduced evi *83 </

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 18, 2019 Decided December 20, 2019 No. 17-1262 NORTHERN VIRGINIA ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., PETITIONER v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, RESPONDENT Consolidated with 17-1265, 18-1230, 18-1234 On Petitions for Review of Orders of the Fede

Case: 20-1415 Document: 62 Page: 1 Filed: 03/15/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ BASF PLANT SCIENCE, LP, Plaintiff-Appellant v. COMMONWEALTH SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH ORGANISATION, Defendant-Cross-Appellant ------------------------------------------------- COMMONWEALTH SCIENTIFIC

Case: 20-1415 Document: 62 Page: 1 Filed: 03/15/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ BASF PLANT SCIENCE, LP, Plaintiff-Appellant v. COMMONWEALTH SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH ORGANISATION, Defendant-Cross-Appellant ------------------------------------------------- COMMONWEALTH SCIENTIFIC

WILKINS, Chief Judge, dissenting: In the face of substantial evidence that Percy Levar Walton does not understand that his execution will mean his death, defined as the end of his physical life, the majority opinion and Judge Williams’ concurrence take the position that an individual may be found competent to be executed under Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 106 S.Ct. 2595, 91 L.Ed.2d 335 (1986), with

Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Judge MOTZ wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge WILKINS joined. Judge SHEDD wrote a dissenting opinion. DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge: Percy Levar Walton appeals the denial of his second federal habeas petition, contending that his execution would violate the Eighth Amendment. Specifically, he asserts that to execute him would violate both the prohibition agai

PRESENT: All the Justices MELINDA NORTON, ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No. 201028 JUSTICE CLEO E. POWELL MAY 27, 2021 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF FAIRFAX COUNTY FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY Michael F. Devine, Judge Melinda Norton, Cecilia Gonzalez, Amjad Arnous, Jo

Justice THOMAS, concurring. I join the Court's opinion, which correctly concludes that respondent's Suspension Clause argument fails because he does not seek a writ of habeas corpus. I write separately to address the original meaning of the Suspension Clause, which guarantees that "[t]he Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require i

ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 5431694 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

MARCUS, Circuit Judge: Petitioner Domineque Ray has moved this Court for an emergency stay of his execution, scheduled to take place at 6:00 p.m. (CST) on February 7, 2019 at the Holman Correctional Facility ("Holman") in Atmore, Alabama, for the 1995 rape, robbery, and murder of fifteen-year-old Tiffany Harville. He also appeals from the determination of the district court denying his

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER LARKINS, Chief Judge: On January 12, 1978, this Court entered an ORDER which consolidated the two above-referenced actions pursuant to F.R. Civ.P. 42(a), as they present common questions of law. The January 12,1978 ORDER further stated that the Counts contained in the Complaint in No. 77-0030-Civ-2, wherein First Colony Farms, Inc. [hereafter First Colony] is Plaintiff, were to b

Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Judge Keenan wrote the opinion, in which Judge Motz and Judge Thacker joined. BARBARA MILANO KEENAN, Circuit Judge: In this appeal, we consider the district court’s dismissal of a motion for post-conviction relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We decide whether our decision on direct a

MEMORANDUM OPINION Gladys Kessler, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Defendants R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (“RJRT”) and Lorillard Tobacco *33 Company (“Lorillard”) (collectively, “Defendants”)

OPINION OF THE COURT Andrew G. Tarantino, Jr., J. Nature of the Case This case was transferred from Supreme Court to this trial court pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 325 (d). Plaintiff husband and wife were prospective purchasers of real property on Long Island. The seller, in foreclosure, entered into the residential contract of sale. The purchasers were denied their mortga

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-4870 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JOLON DEVON CARTHORNE, SR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:10-cr-00096-WO-1)

808 F.Supp.2d 830 (2011) Aaron TOBEY, Plaintiff, v. Janet NAPOLITANO, in her official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Washington, D.C. 20528, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:11CV154-HEH. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. August 30, 2011. *833 J

464 F.Supp.2d 536 (2006) David M. RUTTENBERG, et al. Plaintiffs, v. Frank JONES, et al. Defendants. No. 1:06CV639. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. December 13, 2006. *537 *538 *539 *540

William Todd Jamison v. State of Maryland, No. 6, Sept. Term, 2016 Opinion by Battaglia, J. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – OTHER POSTCONVICTION REVIEW – DNA EVIDENCE—POSTCONVICTION REVIEW– MD. CODE ANN., CRIM. PROC. § 8-201 (2008 Repl. Vol., 2009 Supp.) – Court of Appeals held that the Petition for DNA testing, under Section 8-201 of the Criminal Procedure Article, was not available to an individual who earlier entered an Alford plea, considered a guilty plea, to the same offense. Circuit Court for Balt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA QUANG NGUYEN, Plaintiff, v. No. 19-cv-894 (DLF) KIMBERLY VU, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In this diversity case, Quang Nguyen brings various state law claims against Kimberly Vu and two of her solely-owned compani

712 S.E.2d 468 (2011) Gardiner S. MULFORD, et al. v. WALNUT HILL FARM GROUP, LLC. Record No. 100333. Supreme Court of Virginia. June 9, 2011. *470 Benjamin J. Trichillo (Trichillo, Bancroft, McGavin, Horvath & Judkins, on briefs), for appellants. Paul A. Simpson, Fredericksburg, (Stacie C. Bordick, Fredericksburg; Hirs