⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

5 opinions for “Ancora Technologies, Inc. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd.”

Ancora Technologies, Inc. v. Roku, Inc.public domain
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2025-06-16 · Published · cited 1× · 140 F.4th 1351
Case: 23-1674 Document: 68 Page: 1 Filed: 06/16/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ANCORA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellant v. ROKU, INC., VIZIO, INC., NINTENDO CO., LTD., NINTENDO OF AMERICA INC., Appellees ______________________ 2023-1674, 2023-1701 ___________
read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · company profile: Ancora Technologies → · find the judge →
Tecsec, Inc. v. Adobe Inc.public domain
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020-10-23 · Published · cited 97× · 978 F.3d 1278
Case: 19-2192 Document: 60 Page: 1 Filed: 10/23/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ TECSEC, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. ADOBE INC., Defendant-Cross-Appellant SAS INSTITUTE, INC., SAP AMERICA, INC., SAP AG, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., SYBASE, INC., SOFTWARE AG, SOFTWARE AG, INC., ORACLE CORPORATIO
read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · company profile: Adobe Inc. → · find the judge →
Citrix Sys., Inc. v. Avi Networks, Inc.public domain
District Court, D. Delaware · 2019-02-13 · Published · cited 2× · 363 F. Supp. 3d 511
STARK, U.S District Judge: *516Plaintiff Citrix Systems, Inc. ("Citrix") filed suit against Defendant Avi Networks, Inc. ("Avi") on December 21, 2017. (D.I. 1) Citrix alleges infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,148,493 ("the '493 patent"), 8,631,120 ("the '120 patent"), 8,230,055 ("the '055 patent"), and 7,720,954 ("the '954 patent"). (D.I. 21)
read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →
Veracode, Inc. v. Appthority, Inc.public domain
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015-09-30 · Published · cited 4× · 137 F. Supp. 3d 17; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132919; 2015 WL 5749435
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. BACKGROUND.. .32 A. Factual Background... 32 B. Procedural History.. .33 1. Initial Complaint and Pre-Trial Proceedings.. .33 2. Jury Verdict... 34 3. Post-Trial Motions... 34 C. Applicable Standards of Review.. .35
read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →
Specialized Monitoring Solutions, LLC v. ADT LLCpublic domain
District Court, E.D. Texas · 2019-02-07 · Published · cited 1× · 367 F. Supp. 3d 575
WILLIAM C. BRYSON, UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE Before the Court is a motion for summary judgment by defendant ADT LLC d/b/a ADT Security Services ("ADT"). Dkt. No. 62. Plaintiff Specialized Monitoring Solutions, LLC, ("SMS") is the owner of U.S. Patent No. 6,657,553 ("the '553 patent") and has asserted clai
read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · company profile: ADT LLC → · find the judge →