Cases

MEAD, J. [¶ 1] The father of L.D. appeals from a judgment entered by the District Court (Augusta, Stanfill, J.) terminating his parental rights to the child and denying his kinship placement request. We affirm the judgment terminating his parental rights to the child. We dismiss the appeal with regard to the kinship placement request pursuant to 22 M.R.S. §

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC18-1238 ____________ JASON ANDREW SIMPSON, Appellant, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ____________ No. SC19-700 ____________

469 S.E.2d 387 (1996) 220 Ga. App. 256 MOREY et al. v. BROWN MILLING COMPANY. No. A95A1844. Court of Appeals of Georgia. February 20, 1996. *388 Langley & Lee, C. Richard Langley, Albany, for appellants. Norman J. Crowe, Jr., Sylvester, for appellee. ANDREWS, Judge. Larry Morey and

974 A.2d 978 (2009) 186 Md. App. 477 Thomas FREED, et al., v. D.R.D. POOL SERVICE, INC. No. 2258, September Term, 2007. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. July 6, 2009. *980 Andrew H. Baida (Benjamin Rosenberg, Douglas J. Furlong, Rosenberg, Martin, Greenberg, LLP, on the brief), Baltimore, (Gary A. Wai

COMBS, C.J.: ¶ 1 The question presented to this Court is whether 86A O.S. Supp, 2013. § 61 is unconstitutional because: 1) it violates the due process rights of claimants guaranteed by U.S. Const, amend. XIV, § 1 and Okla. Const, art. 2, § 7; 2) it is a special law prohibited by Okla. Const, art. 6,46; and 3) it fails to provide an adequate remedy for a recognized wrong, in viola

827 F.Supp. 472 (1993) Oddie CLEARY, Lewis C. Brooks, Claude Howard, John Williams, Leonid Brenman, and Louis A. Osterling, Plaintiffs, v. ADM MILLING CO., Defendant. No. 92 C 1190. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. June 21, 1993. *473 Marvin Gittler, Asher, Gittler, Greenfield, Cohen & D'Alba, Chicago, IL, An

In I the Misssouri Court C off Appeaals Westeern Disttrict ANDRE EW GARR RETT, ) ) Appellant, ) D78443 WD

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC16-931 ____________ TUYUANA L. MORRIS, etc., Petitioner, vs. ORLANDO S. MUNIZ, M.D., et al., Respondents. September 6, 2018 PARIENTE, J.

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT LINDSAY WALLACE, Appellant, v. ANDREW WALLACE, Appellee. No. 4D2024-0441 [July 23, 2025] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Karen M. M

Missouri Court of Appeals Western District ‘ANDREW GARRETT, ) Appellant, § WD78443 v. § OPINION FILED: September 6, 2016 MlCHAEL BROWN, § Respondent. § Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri The Honorable Kevin D. Harrell, Judge Before Division Three: Joseph M. Ellis, Senior Judge, Presidingl, Karen King Mitchell, Judge and Gary D. Witt, Judge Appellant Andrew Garrett ("Garrett") appeals the grant of summary judgment by the Circuit Court of Jackson County, in fav

Opinion of the Court by Justice ABRAMSON. Coy Turner, Jr. and M & W Milling Co., Inc. (collectively “M & W), appeal from a Court of Appeals decision reversing a judgment of the Adair Circuit Court granting them a “judgment on the pleadings.” The judgment dismissed the underlying action brought by Billy Andrew, Jr., seeking personal property damages and lost business income resulting from a vehicle col

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA TUYUANA L. MORRIS, as NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO Personal Representative of the FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Estate of SHUNTERIA S. DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED MCINTYRE, deceased, CASE NO. 1D14-3987 Appellant, v. ORLANDO S. MUNIZ, M.D., MARIANNA OB/GYN ASSOCIATES, INC., JA

Appellate Case: 15-6190 Document: 237-1 Date Filed: 01/13/2026 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS January 13, 2026

Justice Green delivered the opinion of the Court. In this case, we must determine whether the court of appeals erred by reversing the trial court’s order granting summary judgement in favor of multiple defendants on the plaintiffs claims for breach.of contract and tortious’ interference with contract. Because we conclude that the plaintiffs employer was not

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT D. R., a minor, by and through his No. 21-56053 guardian ad litem R. R., Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-06307- v. JFW-MAA REDONDO BEACH UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, a local OPINION educational agency, Defen

USCA11 Case: 23-10459 Document: 89-1 Date Filed: 01/11/2024 Page: 1 of 59 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-10459 ____________________ ANDREW H. WARREN,

USCA11 Case: 23-10459 Document: 85-1 Date Filed: 01/10/2024 Page: 1 of 59 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-10459 ____________________ ANDREW H. WARREN,

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-20-00295-CV ALLISON MICHELLE CROWELL, APPELLANT V. NATHAN ANDREW CROWELL, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 146th District Court Bell County, T

147 B.R. 119 (1992) In re J.R. CALDWELL, Sr., J.R. Caldwell, Jr. and Mary B. Caldwell, d/b/a Caldwell Dairy Farms, Debtors. PIEDMONT FARM CREDIT, ACA, Appellant, v. G & M MILLING COMPANY, Appellee. Bankruptcy Nos. B-91-19004 C-7, 2:92CV00264. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina, Greensboro Division. October 13, 1992. Thomas William Waldrep, Jr.

OPINION MERRITT, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Andrew Lee Thomas, Jr. appeals the district court’s order denying his habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 for relief from his federal court conviction. This case is a companion to Andrew L. Thomas v. Westbrooks, No. 15-5399, 849 F.3d 659, 2017 WL 727151 (6th Cir. Feb. 24, 2017), whi