⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Andrew J Daniels”

In re Andrew C.public domain
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2025-05-19 · Published · cited 0× · 351 Conn. 784
Page 2 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL May 20, 2025 784 MAY, 2025 351 Conn. 784 In re Andrew C. IN RE ANDREW C.* (SC 21078) (SC 21079) Mullins, C. J., and D’Auria, Ecker, Alexander, Da
Supreme Court of Alabama · 2014-08-15 · Published · cited 0× · 160 So. 3d 271; 2014 WL 4055819; 2014 Ala. LEXIS 112
BRYAN, Justice. Andrew J. Gentry III (“Drew Gentry”) appeals the Lee Circuit Court’s judgment dismissing his claims against Daniel Lindsey, Sr., Jackson Thornton & Co., P.C. (“Jackson Thornton”), Daniel Lindsey, Jr., Justin M. Parnell (“Matt Parnell”), Parnell & Crum, and Wilbur Investments, LLC (‘Wilbur Investments”). For the reasons set forth herein, we conclude that the
In re Andrew C.public domain
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2024-11-04 · Published · cited 0×
************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor
Tanksley v. Danielspublic domain
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017-04-28 · Published · cited 1× · 259 F. Supp. 3d 271
OPINION Slomsky, District Judge TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION.;.277 II. BACKGROUND...277 III. STANDARD OF REVIEW.. .279 IV. ANALYSIS...280 *277A. Plaintiff Has Not Plausibly Alleged a Claim of Copyright Infringement Against Fox Defendants.. .280</
Supreme Court of Florida · 2017-03-02 · Published · cited 0× · 212 So. 3d 291; 42 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 272; 2017 WL 822184; 2017 Fla. LEXIS 423
PARIENTE, J., concurring in result. I agree with the majority that “Judge Decker’s misconduct unquestionably warrants the imposition of a serious sanction.” Majority op. at 307. I also agree with the increase of sanctions from the JQC’s recommended 90-day suspension without pay to a six-month suspension without pay. The increase in sanctions is appropriate given the seriousness of the multiple charges agai
Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2018-12-05 · Published · cited 9× · 263 So. 3d 321
WEIMER, Justice This case concerns a post-divorce community property partition. The former husband, Daniel Webb, filed a claim for reimbursement and for the classification of a promissory note of $250,000 as a community obligation. The promissory note corresponds to a loan secured by a mortgage on the family home. Mr. Webb contended that Mrs. Webb owed reimbursement for loan payments an
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2003-01-16 · Published · cited 0× · 92 S.W.3d 929; 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 308; 2003 WL 124660
OPINION PER CURIAM. On December 13, 2002, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov't.Code Ann. § 22.221 (Vernon Supp.2002); see also Tex.R.App. P. 52. We deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
Daniels v. Robbinspublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2010-02-24 · Published · cited 108× · 182 Cal. App. 4th 204; 105 Cal. Rptr. 3d 683; 2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 223
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 206 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 207 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018-08-28 · Published · cited 82× · 902 F.3d 165
FISHER, Circuit Judge. Clayton Prince Tanksley is an actor and producer who lives in Philadelphia. In 2005, he created a three-episode television pilot, Cream , for which he received a copyright. In 2015, Fox Television debuted a new series, Empire , from award-winning producer and director Lee Daniels. Shortly thereafter, Tanksley filed suit, c
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017-05-16 · Published · cited 56× · 396 P.3d 210; 2017 OK 42; 2017 WL 2123981; 2017 Okla. LEXIS 44
Wyrick, J., concurring in judgment: ¶ 1 Briana Andrews was born with a shoulder injury that has left her with permanent, debilitating nerve damage. Briana’s parents brought suit alleging that Briana’s injury was caused by the negligence of the medical professionals who delivered her. They claim the doctor negligently delivered Briana using techniques that injured her shoulder, and that Mercy Hospital’s nurse
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016-01-05 · Published · cited 0× · 478 S.W.3d 574; 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 3
Cynthia L. Martin, Judge Andrew Kory (“Kory”) filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in this court alleging that he is being confined in the Daviess/DeKalb Regional Jail by Bob Gray, the Jail Administrator (“Respondent”) in restraint of his liberty. We agree and issue our writ of habeas corpus. Factual and Procedural Background
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2015-06-02 · Published · cited 0× · 179 So. 3d 1171; 2015 Miss. App. LEXIS 296; 2015 WL 3541942
ISHEE, J., for the Court: ¶1. In 1995, Marty Daniels, through his company, Marty Daniels Construction LLC (collectively Daniels), built a custom home for certain property owners in Oxford, Mississippi. During .the building process, trees, shrubs, and dirt were removed from the property, thus creating a gully. The property owners instructed Daniels to take
People v. Danielspublic domain
Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009-12-10 · Published · cited 22× · 240 P.3d 409; 2009 Colo. App. LEXIS 1914; 2009 WL 4680250
240 P.3d 409 (2009) The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kalin Andrew DANIELS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08CA2586. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. V. December 10, 2009. John W. Suthers, Attorney General, John Seidel, Assistant Attorney General, Denver, Colorado, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Michael J. Heaphy, P.C., Michael J.
Nevada Supreme Court · 2018-12-13 · Published · cited 36× · 432 P.3d 180
By the Court, DOUGLAS, C.J.: *182An insurance policy generally contains an insurer's contractual duty to defend its insured in any lawsuits that involve claims covered under the umbrella of the insurance policy. In response to a certified question submitted by the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, we consider "[w]hether
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018-03-05 · Published · cited 27× · 883 F.3d 1071
ERICKSON, Circuit Judge. In response to an emergency call from a male reporting he had been stabbed inside his apartment and was hiding in the closet, police officers located John Raines IV ("Raines") standing outside on the sidewalk of the apartment building holding a knife. During the encounter with Raines, which lasted less than two minutes, the officers shot at Raines twenty-one t
Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2018-05-02 · Published · cited 0× · 919 N.W.2d 635
BOWER, Judge. Paul Monahan appeals his convictions on five counts of invasion of privacy. We find the State has failed to show the complaining witnesses had a reasonable expectation of privacy. Also, because there is limited evidence to show Monahan knowingly viewed the genitals of the five complaining witnesses and no evidence beyond that to show he was acting for the purpose of arousi
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015-04-01 · Published · cited 0× · 781 F.3d 1029; 2015 WL 1446771
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 13-3607 ___________________________ Robl Construction, Inc., a Kansas Corporation lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Andrew G. Homoly
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2013-10-16 · Published · cited 1× · 233 Ariz. 243; 311 P.3d 656; 671 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 4; 2013 WL 5645146; 2013 Ariz. App. LEXIS 213
OPINION VÁSQUEZ, Presiding Judge. ¶ 1 After a jury trial, appellant Daniel Snider was convicted of nine counts of first-degree burglary, ten counts of armed robbery, and one count each of aggravated assault and attempted armed robbery. The trial court sentenced 1 him to a 7.5-year p
People v. Danielspublic domain
New York Court of Appeals · 2005-06-14 · Published · cited 4× · 833 N.E.2d 704; 5 N.Y.3d 738; 800 N.Y.S.2d 369
5 N.Y.3d 738 (2005) 833 N.E.2d 704 800 N.Y.S.2d 369 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHARLES DANIELS, Appellant. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BYRON ROBINSON, Appellant. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued April 26, 2005. Decided June 14, 2005.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013-04-02 · Published · cited 3× · 711 F.3d 905; 2013 WL 1296385; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 6546
ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. Georgina Stephens and Andrew Alexander appeal from the decision of the district court 1 affirming an order of the bankruptcy court giving possession of disputed property to John Hedback and Mary Jo Jensen-Carter, trustees of the individual bankruptcy estates of Ms. Stephens and Larry Alexander (Mr