Cases

United Parcel Service, et al. v. David Strothers, No. 9, September Term, 2022. Opinion by Eaves, J. LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT — WORKERS’ COMPENSATION The Court of Appeals held that the phrase “definite proof,” as used in § 9-504(a)(1) of the Labor and Employment Article, refers to the quality of evidence required by a workers’ compensation claimant’s burden of production for an accidental hernia and does not elevate the claimant’s burden of persuasion to clear and convincing evidence. LABOR AND EM

365 S.W.3d 387 (2011) JSC NEFTEGAS-IMPEX, Appellant, v. CITIBANK, N.A., Appellee. Citibank, N.A., Appellant, v. JSC Neftegas-Impex, Appellee. No. 01-07-00397-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). February 10, 2011. *391 Lloyd R. Cunningham, Lori A. Swann, Cunningham Law Group, Houston, TX, for Appellant.

Relator, Gerald O. Strothers, Jr., avers that he has requested access to two automobile titles which are maintained by respondent, Gerald E. Fuerst, Clerk of Courts. Relator further avers that he has been denied access to these records. Relator requests that this court compel respondent to permit relator "to review and inspect" the automobile titles. By entry dated April 29, 1997, this court granted respondent's motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to May 21, 199

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA Nos. COA17-234, COA17-235, COA17-236, COA17-237 Filed: 7 November 2017 Mecklenburg County, No. 16 SPC 4047 IN THE MATTER OF: P.S. Mecklenburg County, No. 16 SPC 4126 IN THE MATTER OF: L.T. Mecklenburg County, No. 16 SPC 4081 IN THE MATTER OF: N.J. Mecklenburg County, No. 16 SPC 4080 IN THE MATTER OF: R.J. Appeal by respondents from orders entered 16 June 2016 by Judg

853 P.2d 726 (1993) 115 N.M. 475 AZTEC WELL SERVICING CO., INC., Gary Dean Cole, Stanley S. Brooks, Max Larson, and Andrew K. Brashear, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE, GUARANTY ASSOCIATION OF the State of New Mexico, Defendant-Appellant. No. 20569. Supreme Court of New Mexico. May 10, 1993.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 14-0230 Filed March 25, 2015 A. ANDREW MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. CHEMTECH, INC. and DALE EASTMAN, Defendants-Appellants. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Dallas County, Randy V. Hefner, Judge. The defendants appeal from the district court’s judgment and award of damag

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS WILLIAM ALSUP, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE INTRODUCTION In this action asserting claims under federal securities law and state law, defendants filed two motions to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). To the extent stated below, both motions are GRANTED. STATEMENT The essence of this case is

347 B.R. 822 (2006) In re ORCHARD AT HANSEN PARK, LLC, Debtor. No. 06-32016 HDH-11. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. July 7, 2006. *823 John Mark Chevallier, McGuire, Craddock & Strother, for Debtor. Gerrit M. Pronske, Pronske & Patel, P.C., for HSM-Kennewick. John D. Penn, Haynes & B

2005 WI 79 John R. Ammerman, Robert L. Klein and Brian G. Sumption, Plaintiffs, ROI Investments, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, v. Paddy A. Hauden and Susan A. Scholl, Defendants-Respondents-Cross Petitioners. No. 2003AP2249. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Oral Argument: April 26, 2005. Opinion Filed: June 17, 2005. For the plaintiff-appellant-pet

263 F.3d 129 (4th Cir. 2001) RICHARD N. MOSEMAN, an individual; DANIEL ROUSSEAU, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.BLAKE VAN LEER, an individual; GARNET, INCORPORATED; GARNETOF VIRGINIA, INCORPORATED, now known as King George Landfill, Incorporated; GARNETOF MARYLAND, INCORPORATED; GARNET ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED; CROSS ROAD TRAIL, INCORPORATED, ROLLINS AVENUE, INCORPORATED; KING GEORGE LAND COMPANY, INCORPORATED; BKJB PARTNERSHIP, a Georgia corpora

545 F.3d 1058 (2008) PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WISCONSIN, Petitioner v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent American Transmission Company, LLC et al., Intervenors American Transmission Company, LLC et al., Petitioner v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent Public Service Commission of Wisconsin et al., Intervenors. Nos. 06-1408, 07-1016. United States Cou

343 S.C. 335 (2001) 540 S.E.2d 843 Roy A. PRUITT, R. Anthony Pruitt, and Pamela Hatcher, Petitioners, v. SOUTH CAROLINA MEDICAL MALPRACTICE LIABILITY JOINT UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION, Respondent. No. 25228. Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard November 1, 2000. Decided January 8, 2001. Rehearing Denied February 12, 2001.

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} We affirm the Seventh District Court of Appeals’ dismissal of a complaint filed by relator-appellant, John F. Capron III, seeking a writ of mandamus compelling respondents-appellees, Anthony J. Dattilio, the Columbiana County clerk of courts, and Robert L. Herron, the Columbiana County prosecutor, to accept for filing an affidavit alleging a criminal offense an

263 Wis.2d 370 (2003) 2003 WI App 76 661 N.W.2d 858 WISCONSIN CITIZENS CONCERNED FOR CRANES AND DOVES, John Wieneke and Pat Fisher, Plaintiffs-Respondents,[†] v. WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Defendant-Appellant, U.S. SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE FOUNDATION f/k/a Wildlife Legislative Fund of America, Defendant-Intervenor-Co-Appellant. No. 02-1166. <

Affirmed by published opinion. Senior Judge BEEZER wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge WILKINSON and Judge KING joined. OPINION BEEZER, Senior Circuit Judge: Richard Moseman and Daniel Rousseau appeal the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants. Plaintiffs’ claims are based on common law fraud and on

DAVIS, Judge. *216P.S. ("Paul"),1 L.T. ("Luke"), N.J. ("Natalie"), and R.J. ("Robert") (collectively, "Respondents") appeal from the trial court's 16 June 2016 orders concurring in their voluntary readmissions to Strategic Behavioral Center for inpatient mental health treatment. The primary issue in these four con

People v Brown (2020 NY Slip Op 08011) People v Brown 2020 NY Slip Op 08011 Decided on December 29, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §

693 S.E.2d 353 (2010) William WHITEHEART d/b/a Whiteheart Advertising Company v. Betty Strother WALLER and Waller & Stewart, LLP (formerly known as Waller, Stroud, Stewart, & Araneda LLP). No. 395P09. Supreme Court of North Carolina. January 28, 2010. Randolph M. James, Winston-Salem, for William Whiteheart. E. Fitzgerald Parnell, III, Cynthia L. Van

MEMORANDUM DECISION ROBERT D. MARTIN, Bankruptcy Judge. This unusual case asks a bankruptcy court to determine whether an assault (possibly a sexual assault or rape) and a wrongful death (possibly a murder) were the willful and intentional acts of the debt- or, and, whether claims arising from the injuries are dischargeable in the debtor’s bankruptcy. Because no liability for the alleged acts has yet been

Opinion of the Court by MOON, C.J. Following a sixteen-day bench trial, defendants-appellants Department of Human Services (DHS) and State of Hawaii (State) [hereinafter, collectively, DHS or the State] appeal from the Circuit Court of the Second Circuit’s1 January 22, 2007 second amended judgment, entered in favor of plaintiffs-appel-lees George Kaho'ohanohano (George), as next