Cases

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL II JOSÉ M. MALDONADO Apelación HERNÁNDEZ Y TERESA procedente del GARCÍA CENTENO Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Apelante Superior de

183 F.Supp.2d 481 (2002) UNITED STATES of America, v. Angel RENTAS CRUZ, Defendant. No. Crim.01-642(HL). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. January 9, 2002. *482 Hector E. Guzman-Silva, Federal Public Defender's Office, San Juan, PR, for Angel L. Rentas-Cruz, defendant. Sonia I. Torres-Pabon, U.S. Attorney's Off

EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO Queja In re: 2004 TSPR 51 Ángel G. Derkes Guzmán 161 DPR ____ Número del Caso: AB-2001-258 Fecha: 26 de marzo de 2004 Oficina de Inspección de Notarías: Lcda. Carmen H. Carlos Directora Lcdo. Edgard

603 F.3d 99 (2010) UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Harry GUZMAN, Defendant, Appellant. No. 08-1693. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard February 3, 2010. Decided May 3, 2010. *102 James L. Sultan, with whom Jonathan Harwell and Rankin & Sultan were on brief, for the appellant. Sangita K. R

OMNIBUS OPINION AND ORDER JUAN M. PEREZ-GIMENEZ, SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Defendants Jovanni Verestin-Cruz (“Verestin”), Rocky Martinez-Negron (“Martinez”), Edgar Collazo-Rivera (“Col-lazo”), and Carlos Raymundi-Hernandez’s (“Raymundi”) filed motions for acquittal under Rule 29 and/or for a new trial under Rule 33.1 See Docket Nos. 1599, 1594, 1593, and 1600. The United Stat

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A22-0118 Court of Appeals Chutich, J. Dissenting, Hudson, C.J. Took no part, Procaccini, J. Alejandro Cruz-Guzman, as guardian and next friend of his minor children,

687 F.Supp.2d 1214 (2009) Jose FUNEZ, guardian ad litem for Aldo FUNEZ, Plaintiff, v. Cruz Bolanos GUZMAN; Luz Armando Barbosa, Armando Barbosa, and Maria Barbosa; Alonzo Campos, Martin Campos, and John Doe 2; Francisco Javiar Campos Chavarria, Juan Campos, and Guadalupe Chavarria; Hernan Cornejo, Manuel Cornejo-Olmeda, and Carmela Cornejo; J.L.; Ignacio Lara-Vasquez and Maria Guadalupe Lara; L.L.; Jose Magana-Macias, Irineo Munoz-Magana, and Jua

OPINION AND ORDER FRANCISCO A. BESOSA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On September 27, 2012, a federal grand jury returned an indictment charging defendant Cecilio Mercedes-De La Cruz (“Mercedes”) and his co-defendants, José Miguel Guzman-De Los Santos (“Guzman”) and Victor Manuel Carela (“Care-la”), with conspiring to possess with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C.

46 Cal.4th 887 (2009) JAVIER R. GUZMAN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. COUNTY OF MONTEREY et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. S157793. Supreme Court of California. June 22, 2009. *892 Sullivan Hill Lewin Rez & Engel, Brian L. Burchett; Law Offices of Richard H. Rosenthal, Richard H. Rosenthal; Selden Law Firm and Ly

66 Cal.Rptr.3d 258 (2007) 155 Cal.App.4th 645 Javier R. GUZMAN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. COUNTY OF MONTEREY et al. Defendants and Respondents. No. H030647. Court of Appeal of California, Sixth District. September 25, 2007. *260 Sullivan Hill Lewin Rez & Engel, Brian L. Burchett, San Diego,

Sánchez Martínez, Juez Ponente TEXTO COMPLETO DE LA SENTENCIA Esta apelación plantea solo dos controversias: si se probó la culpabilidad del apelante Angel Guzmán Vázquez fuera de duda razonable y si la multa que se le impuso es muy severa a la luz de la conducta imputada. Por las razones que prosiguen confirmamos la sentencia apelada. El apelante Angel Guzmán Vázquez fue denunciado po

(2007) Edgardo Cruz VELAZQUEZ, et al., Plaintiffs v. Angel D. Rodriguez QUIÑONES, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 03-1255 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. August 2, 2007. OPINION AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. On March 10, 2003, plaintiffs Edgardo Cruz-Velazquez ("Cruz-Velazquez") and his wife Judith Velazquez-Rivera (col

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 352 Shortly before midnight on September 20, 1966, defendant and Betty Jo Hales were in the living room of defendant's apartment. Betty Jo was not wearing clothes. Defendant was holding a bolt action Enfield rifle, which discharged two bullets within a space of about three seconds. They entered Betty Jo's body,

254 B.R. 801 (2000) In re Mario CRUZ and Mercedes Cruz, Debtors. No. 97-B-40236 (AJG). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. June 21, 2000. *802 Dennis J. O'Sullivan, Flushing, for Mario Cruz. Law Offices of Bernard D'Orazio, P.C., New York, of Counsel: Bernard D'Orazio, for Enterprise Auto Sales Corporation.

*422TEXTO COMPLETO DE LA SENTENCIA El apelante, Dr. José A. Segarra, (en adelante, "Dr. Segarra") nos solicita la revocación de la sentencia dictada por el Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de Bayamón el día 15 de marzo de 1996 en una acción por impericia médica presentada contra él por la/parte apelada, señora Guillermina Vachier Guzmán (en adelante, "Sra

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FRANCISCO A. BESOSA, District Judge. On April 21, 2014, a trial commenced against defendant Luis Angel Manso-Cepeda (“Manso”) for aiding and abetting Lisander Casillas-Sanchez (“Casillas”), a convicted felon, in the unlawful possession of a firearm, all in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 & 922(g)(1). (Docket Nos. 12 & 64.) At the conclusion of the government’s case, Manso moved fo

ORDER FUSTE, District Judge. We have before us a motion for summary judgment filed by codefendant Andrés García Arache, a former Police Superintendent of Puerto Rico. There, it is alleged that there is no liability under 42 U.S.C. sec. 1983 for the facts complained of herein. The undisputed facts for purposes of this motion establish that on or around August 31, 1985, plaintiff Bradier Ste

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Petitioner, a native and citizen of the Philippines and lawful permanent resident of the United States, proceeding pro se , filed a federal petition for writ of habeas corpus, under 28 U.S.C. § 2241.1 Petitioner is currently

EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO El Pueblo de Puerto Rico Recurrido Certiorari v. 2004 TSPR 13 Rubén Guzmán Meléndez 160 DPR ____ Peticionario Número del Caso: CC-2003-711 Fecha: 28 de enero de 2004 Tribunal de Circuito de Apelaciones: Circuito Regional VII Juez Ponente: Hon. José L. Miranda de Hostos

JUSTICE DEVINE delivered the opinion of the Court. The sole issue in this interlocutory appeal is whether the defendant’s voluntary cessation of challenged conduct rendered the plaintiffs’ claims for prospective relief moot. The court of appeals held that it did. 482 S.W.3d 120, 127^34 (TexApp.-Beaumont 2014) (mem.op.). Because the challenged conduct might reasonably, be expected to recur, we reverse and rem