Cases

JUDGMENT Per Curiam This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

750 F.Supp.2d 1132 (2010) Teressa KELLEY, an individual, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, and Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. No. CV F 10-1294 AWI JLT. United States District Court, E.D. California. September 30, 2010. *1135 Peter Charles Flanderka, Anne Smallwood Kelson, Bononi Law Group, LLP, Los Ange

642 F.Supp.2d 1048 (2009) Stephen KELLEY and Kathy Kelley, Plaintiffs, v. MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., et al., Defendants. No. C 09-01538 SI. United States District Court, N.D. California. August 12, 2009. *1051 Renee Marguerite Marcelle, Law Offices of Renee M. Marcelle, San Rafael, CA, for Plaintiffs.

SUMMARY In a medical negligence action a defendant doctor is not entitled to obtain summary judgment based on a conclusory expert declaration which states the opinion that no malpractice has occurred, but does not explain the basis for the opinion. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW At midnight on Thursday, November 24, 1994, appellant Kelley lacerated his forearm on broken glass. He bled profusely. He went to the emergency room, where the laceratio

KEARSE, Circuit Judge. Petitioner pro se Angel Amado Santos-Salazar (“Santos”), an alien who has been ordered removed from the United States pursuant to, inter alia, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(II) on the ground that he has been convicted of a controlled-substance offense, has petitioned this Court for review of an order of the United Stat

ORDER AND OPINION HUDDLESTON, Judge: Norma Jean Angel appeals the decision of Harlan Circuit Court to dismiss her personal injury action against the Harlan County Board of Education. The only issue presented is whether the circuit court erred in dismissing the complaint against the Board based on the doctrine of sovereign immunity. Angel fell into an uncovered manhole located at th

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ No. 21-3187 ______________ TREMAYNE DURHAM, Appellant v. C.O.R. G. KELLEY; C.O.R. B. CORREA; C.O.R. W. GRAY; C.O.R. W. VINCENTE; C.O.R. J. RODRIGUEZ; C.O.R. K. VEGA; O.F.C. Z. GOODWIN; O.F.C. L. JOVANOVIC; O.F.C. M. DOYLE; SUSAN SPINGLER; NURSE M

957 F.Supp. 873 (1997) Cathy KELLEY, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN HEYER-SCHULTE CORPORATION f/k/a Heyer-Schulte Corporation, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. SA-93-CA-0145. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, San Antonio Division. March 11, 1997. *874 *875 Michael T. Gallagher, Price Ainsw

01/29/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON September 12, 2023 Session LISA KELLEY ET AL. v. NATHANIEL ROOT ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for McNairy County No. 2019-CV-12 J. Weber McCraw, Judge ___________________________________

MEMORANDUM DECISION ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DENNIS MONTALI, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge I. INTRODUCTION Debtor James Madison Kelley (“Debt- or”) commenced the underlying chapter 11 case more than seven years ago after defaulting on two loans from Washington Mutual Bank (“WaMu”); the loans were secured by his residence in Saratoga, California (the “Property”). In this adversary

*820At issue on these appeals are several orders of a special referee (hereinafter the Referee) appointed by the Supreme Court to resolve certain questions and motions regarding discovery. In an order dated May 4, 2010, the Referee found that the plaintiffs had failed to meet a discovery deadline set by an order of the Supreme Court dated December 4, 2007, directing that they respond to the defenda

Nora Barry Fischer, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Presently before the Court are the respective Motions to Dismiss filed by Allegheny County Port Authority, Allegheny County Port Authority Police Department, Brian O'Malley, Matthew Porter, and Dominic Rivotti, (Docket No. 10 (hereinafter "Port Authority Motion") ), and County of Allegheny, (Docket No. 13 (hereinafter "Allegheny County

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-3079 ___________________________ Mark T. Morris, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant, v. Sheriff Kelley Cradduck; Nurse Darla Watson; Sheriff Shawn Holloway1

*820At issue on these appeals are several orders of a special referee (hereinafter the Referee) appointed by the Supreme Court to resolve certain questions and motions regarding discovery. In an order dated May 4, 2010, the Referee found that the plaintiffs had failed to meet a discovery deadline set by an order of the Supreme Court dated December 4, 2007, directing that they respond to the defenda

WINDOM, Presiding Judge. This Court's opinion of March 14, 2014, is withdrawn, and the following opinion is substituted therefor. Michael Brandon Kelley appeals his convictions for two counts of capital murder and one count of sexual torture. Kelley was convicted of one count of capital murder for taking the life of Emily Milling during the course of a first-degree kidnapping, see § 13A-5-40(a)(1), Ala.Code

IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) IN RE INTEREST OF ANGEL C. NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY NEB. CT. R. APP. P. § 2-102(E). IN RE INTEREST OF ANGEL C., A CHILD UNDER 18 YEARS OF AGE. STATE OF NEBRASKA

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, againstAngel R.R. (Anonymous), Appellant. Appeal from a judgment of the District Court of Suffolk County, First District (Chris Ann Kelley, J.), rendered May 15, 2013. The judgment adjudicated defendant a youthful offender upon a nonjury verdict finding him guilty of criminal mischief in the fourth degree. ORDERED that t

802 F.Supp. 278 (1992) KELLEY BLUE BOOK, Plaintiff, v. CAR-SMARTS, INC., Daniel T. Cwieka, and Jay Barchenger, Defendants. No. SA CV 90-712-LTL (RWRx). United States District Court, C.D. California. August 27, 1992. *279 *280 *281 Edouard V. Rosa, Law Offic

247 P.3d 199 (2011) George KELLEY and Joann Kelley, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Warren YADON, Defendant-Appellant, and Kim Yadon, Defendant-Respondent. No. 36705-2009. Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, December 2010 Term. February 2, 2011. *200 Nelson, Hall, Parry Tucker, P.A., Idaho Falls, for appellant. Sam L.

Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice, dissenting. Miguel and Leticia signed a mediated settlement agreement (MSA) regarding their" divorce, and based on this agreement, the. trial court rendered a divorce decree. Under their agreement, Miguel’s future earnings and income were partitioned to Miguel. Nine months after the trial court rendered the divorce decree, Miguel received a bonus from his employer.' Leticia pe