Cases

308 F.Supp.2d 671 (2004) Richard FRAZIER, Jr., Plaintiff, v. ANGEL MEDICAL CENTER, a corporation; Executive Risk Indemnity Insurance Co., Inc., Policy No. 8168-5451; Nelson P. Davis, M.D.; Bruce Portner, M.D.; Christeen Kaga, M.D.; Gilberto Robels, M.D.; Scott M. Petty, M.D.; Unknown and Unnamed John and Jane Does; Private Medical Corporation or Physicians Professional Corporation, their insurer and unknown entity to be named when known to Plaint

Matter of Angel P. H. (Angel P. Q.) (2024 NY Slip Op 00308) Matter of Angel P. H. (Angel P. Q.) 2024 NY Slip Op 00308 Decided on January 24, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuan

DAVIS, Judge. *407Plaintiff Philip Schmidt, administrator of the estate of Martha Jean Schmidt (“Plaintiff”), appeals from a judgment entered by the trial court upon a jury verdict in favor of Scott Miller Petty, M.D. (“Dr. Petty”) and Nantahala Radiology Associates, P.A. (collectively “Defendants”) in a medical malpractice action. On appeal, he contends the trial cour

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 6D23-3201 Lower Tribunal No. 20-CF-8754-A _____________________________ STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, v. ANGEL AL

(2008) Linda J. PETTY, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. CV01-220-PHX-ROS. United States District Court, D. Arizona. March 27, 2008. ORDER ROSLYN O. SILVER, District Judge. Plaintiff Linda Petty challenges the denial of her application for disability insurance benefits. The parties have filed cro

NO. 07-11-00159-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL B ----------------------------------------------------

NO. 07-11-00159-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL B OCTOBER 19, 2011 ANGEL JAIME TARANGO, APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE FROM THE COUNTY COUR

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 07a0064p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellant, - SHERMAN PETTY,

770 F.Supp.2d 1054 (2011) Steven DUNNER, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN, Defendant. No. CV 09-01732 SJO (Ex). United States District Court, C.D. California. March 7, 2011. *1056 Russell G. Petti, The Law Offices of Russell G. Petti, La Canada, CA, for Plaintiff. Robert L. Fairman,

BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge: Appellee, Sherry Williamson, filed this lawsuit after Appellant, UNUM Life Insurance Company of America, canceled the benefits she was receiving under a long term disability plan issued by UNUM to Williamson’s employer. UNUM appeals from two district court orders granting Williamson partial summary judgment on the issue of the proper standard of review

BIGELOW, P.J. *911Petitioner Paul Anthony Caretto challenges by petition for writ of mandate the trial court's denial of his petition for resentencing *912pursuant to Penal Code section 1170.18, a provision added by Proposition 47.1

JOHNSON, J. *580In 2015, Dioka Okorie (Okorie) sued his employer, Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) and two of his supervisors, Jacqueline Hughes (Hughes) and Cynthia Jackson (Jackson) (collectively, Defendants), alleging, among other things, discrimination, harassment, and retaliation. In response, Defendants filed a special motion t

116 Cal.App.2d 20 (1953) L. DEAN PETTY, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; C.J. GIBSON et al., Real Parties in Interest. Civ. No. 19366. California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Three. Feb. 10, 1953. Joseph Doyle and L. Dean Petty, in pro. per., for Petitioner. Harold W. Kennedy, County Counsel, and William E. Lam

Filed 5/15/14 Modified and Certified for Publication 6/13/14 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT In re J.L., a Person Coming Under the B250566 Juvenile Court Law. (Los Angeles County

OPINION BYBEE, Circuit Judge: Talana Orzechowski challenges Aetna Life Insurance Company’s (Aetna) decision to terminate her long-term disability benefits under a plan created by her employer, The Boeing Company (Boeing). Under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), we may review a denial of benefits. Where a plan grants discretion

Justice BREYER delivered the opinion of the Court. The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 91 Stat. 874, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., prohibits a debt collector from asserting any “false, deceptive, or misleading representation,” or using any “unfair or unconscionable means” to collect, or attempt to collect, a debt, §§ 1692e, 1692f. In th

This action was brought for the specific performance of a contract to convey real property. The court found that the defendant George M. Petty, the vendor named in said contract, could not specifically perform *Page 529 and in lieu thereof awarded the plaintiffs damages in the sum of $7,500, and the additional sum of $500, paid to said defendant in pursuance of the terms of the contract. The action was upon motion for a nonsuit dismissed as to the other d

GEORGE B. DANIELS, United States District Judge: Plaintiffs Joel and Mary Rich bring this action against Defendants Fox News Network, LLC, Fox News reporter Malia Zimmerman (together with Fox News, the "Fox Defendants"), and Fox News contributor Ed Butowsky asserting claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress ("IIED") and for aiding and abetting and conspiring to intentionally inflict emotional distress on Plaintiffs. (

GRABER, Circuit Judge. Defendant Carlos Chavaria-Angel was convicted of unlawful reentry by a deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). *1174 After pleading guilty, he was sentenced as an aggravated felon under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A), based on his prior state convictions for delivery

Jim Hannah, Justice. Appellant Richard Allen Duck appeals his conviction on drug charges from the Prairie County Southern District Circuit Court. Duck entered a conditional guilty plea pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 24.3(b), and was sentenced to ten years of imprisonment, with four years suspended. Duck challenges the denial of his motion to suppress evidence on the grounds that subjecting a package to a “canin