Cases

MEMORANDUM ** Jose Angel Miramontes-Cigarroa, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen and reconsider the underlying *353denial of his application for cancellation of removal. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitione

MEMORANDUM ** Jose Angel Miramontes-Cigarroa, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen and reconsider the underlying *353denial of his application for cancellation of removal. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitione

MEMORANDUM ** Jesus Lopez-Miramontes and Maria Eugenia Lopez, husband and wife and nafives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings. To the extent we have jurisdiction it is pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Iturribarria v. INS

MEMORANDUM ** Gonzalo Miramontes-Frausto appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 70-month sentence for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Miramontes-Frausto has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for

PER CURIAM. Miramontes seeks review by this Court of the Order of the United States Department of Justice, Board of Immigration Appeals, entered on July 23, 1979. Such Order denied petitioner’s motion to reopen deportation proceedings and allowed the Immigration Judge’s Order to deport petitioner to stand. Petitioner contends first that he should not be deported for the reason that he is one of that class

*222Opinion AARON, J. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Dan Clark Family Limited Partnership (Dan Clark) appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court sustained defendants’ demurrer to Dan Clark’s third amended complaint, without leave to amend. The trial court concluded that Dan Clark’s causes of action for conversi

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ANGEL CALLEROS, Appellant, V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. § § §

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § ANGEL CALLEROS, No. 08-09-00231-CR § Appellant, Appeal from the § V.

*1134 ORDER At the request of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, the Memorandum disposition filed April 13, 2001, is redesig-nated as an authored Opinion by Judge Harry Pregerson. OPINION PREGERSON, Circuit Judge: Petit

MEMORANDUM ** Palemón Sanchez appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to with*952draw his guilty plea. We have reviewed the record and the opening brief. Appellee’s unopposed motion for summary affirmance is granted because the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United Stat

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 665 OPINION A landowner seeks to avoid the effect of an irrevocable offer to dedicate land for public use. The dedication was made by a prior owner of the land in 1983, in return for a development permit. We conclude that the current landowner's inverse condemnation claim arrives 20 years too la

GRIMES, J. *475SUMMARY The question in this case is whether the procedural provisions of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA, 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. ) apply to a motion to compel arbitration in a Califo

Opinion RUBIN, Acting P. J. Leon Davis petitions for a writ of mandate directing the trial court to enter its final judgment so that Davis may file a notice of appeal. We grant the petition. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS In October 2008, Leon Davis filed an employment discrimination complaint against his employer, the City of Los Angeles. The city moved for summary judgment. In

180 Cal.App.4th 956 (2009) DAN REDDELL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION, Defendant and Respondent. No. B206428. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six. December 1, 2009. As modified December 29, 2009. *960 William S. Walter for Plaintiff and Appellant. Edmun

OPINION RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge: William Argueta Pena (Pena), a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of a decision by an immigration judge affirming the decision of the asylum officer during expedited removal proceedings. We dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction. /. BACKGROUND

Order; Opinion by Judge RAWLINSON. ORDER Page 9 of the Slip Opinion filed September 28, 2015, first full paragraph is amended as follows: 1. Line 3 — insert preceding . 2. Line 12 — insert the following sentence following the citation to Flores-Miramontes v. I.N.S., 212 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir.2000): <B

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WILLIAM ARGUETA PENA, No. 12-72099 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A205-379-126 LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, ORDER AND Respondent. AMENDED

44 Cal.Rptr.3d 867 (2006) 140 Cal.App.4th 1339 DENNIS C. SCHNEIDER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION, Defendant and Respondent. No. B186149. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Six. June 28, 2006. *868 James S. Burling, Sacramento, and Lawrence G. Salzman, Bellevue, WA, for

590 F.3d 981 (2010) Azra TASLIMI, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 05-71006. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted December 10, 2008. Filed January 4, 2010. *982 Haleh Mansouri, Esq., Los Angeles, CA, for the petitioner. Stuart Nickum, Depa

Filed 2/16/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE THE PEOPLE, B327473 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA498018) v. WOODROW KIM et al., Defendants and Respondents. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Norman J. S