Cases

MEMORANDUM ** Jose Angel Sanchez Suarez and Maria Del Pilar Camacho Solis, husband and wife and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings. To the extent we have jurisdiction it is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Iturribar

MEMORANDUM ** Jose Angel Sanchez Suarez and Maria Del Pilar Camacho Solis, husband and wife and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings. To the extent we have jurisdiction it is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Iturribar

MEMORANDUM*** Respondent’s motion to dismiss this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction in part is granted. See Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592, 600 (9th Cir.2006) (this court lacks jurisdiction to review the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of a motion to reopen “where the question presented is essentially the same discretionary issue originally decided.”). Resp

MEMORANDUM ** We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s November 2004 and February 2005 decisions because petitioner did not file a petition for review after either of these rulings. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1257-58 (9th Cir.1996). The BIA did not abuse its discretion in its June 2004 decision reversing the IJ, because the IJ granted petitioner’s motion to reopen solely on the bas

MEMORANDUM ** We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s November 2004 and February 2005 decisions because petitioner did not file a petition for review after either of these rulings. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1257-58 (9th Cir.1996). The BIA did not abuse its discretion in its June 2004 decision reversing the IJ, because the IJ granted petitioner’s motion to reopen solely on the bas

MEMORANDUM ** Francisco Moreno-Suarez and Maria Leonila Alvarado-Flores, husband and wife and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reconsider. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider, Oh v. Gonzales, 406 F.3d 611, 612 (9th Cir.20

MEMORANDUM ** Jose Alfredo Suarez Manzo and his wife, Adelfa Aguirre, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings. We dismiss the petition for review. *799Petitioners’ motion to reopen contained evidence concerning

MEMORANDUM ** Francisco Moreno-Suarez and Maria Leonila Alvarado-Flores, husband and wife and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reconsider. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider, Oh v. Gonzales, 406 F.3d 611, 612 (9th Cir.20

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas April 30, 2019 No. 04-19-00046-CV Angel SUAREZ, Appellant v. UNIVISION RADIO CORPORATION, Appellees

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-19-00046-CV Angel SUAREZ, Appellant v. UNIVISION RADIO CORPORATION, Appelle

MEMORANDUM ** Jose Alfredo Suarez Manzo and his wife, Adelfa Aguirre, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings. We dismiss the petition for review. *799Petitioners’ motion to reopen contained evidence concerning

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas JUDGMENT No. 04-19-00046-CV Angel SUAREZ, Appellant v. UNIVISION RADIO CORPORATION, Appellee

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas JUDGMENT No. 04-19-00046-CV UNIVISION RADIO CORPORATION, Appellant v. Angel SUAREZ, Appellee From the 22

609 F.Supp.2d 181 (2009) Jose Manuel RAMIREZ-SUAREZ, Plaintiff v. FOOT LOCKER INC., et al., Defendant(s). Civil No. 08-2052 (JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 23, 2009. *182 Carlos Concepcion-Castro, Carlos Concepcion-Castro Law Office, Guaynabo, PR, for Plaintiff. Angel X. Viera-Vargas, Luis D. Ort

MEMORANDUM ** Francisco Moreno-Suarez and Maria Leonila Alvarado-Flores, husband and wife natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) denial of their motion to reopen or reconsider the Board’s earlier summary affirmance of an immigration judge’s denial of their applications for cancellation of removal. We grant in part and deny in part the petitions fo

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas December 12, 2018 No. 04-18-00877-CV Angel L. SUAREZ, Appellant v. SAN MARCOS AIRPORT, Appellee From the County

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas November 20, 2018 No. 04-18-00877-CV Angel L. SUAREZ, Appellant v. SAN MARCOS AIRPORT, Appellee Fro

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-18-00877-CV Angel L. SUAREZ, Appellant v. SAN MARCOS AIRPORT, Appe

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL XI EL PUEBLO DE PUERTO Certiorari procedente del RICO Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Superior Recurrido de Arecibo

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Haynes v. Department of Lottery, 630 So.2d 1177 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 642 So.2d 746 (Fla.1994).