Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Angela D Hemphill”
Angela Lea Argo v. Christina T. Hemphillpublic domain
The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.
Kayla Robinson v. Angela Hawkinspublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-1823 ___________________________ Kayla Robinson Plaintiff - Appellee v. Angela Hawkins, individually and in her official capacity; Kelli S
Kayla Robinson v. Angela Hawkinspublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-1823 ___________________________ Kayla Robinson Plaintiff - Appellee v. Angela Hawkins, individually and in her official capacity; Kelli S
ACCEPTED 03-14-00383-CV 4507160 KASLING, HEMPHILL,
ACCEPTED 03-14-00323-CV 4507251 KASLING, HEMPHILL,
ACCEPTED 03-14-00453-CV 4506763 KASLING, HEMPHILL,
Chapman v. CBS Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER FRANK MAAS, United States Magistrate Judge. This is a mesothelioma case. Plaintiffs Alton Chapman and his wife Frances Chapman (together, the “Plaintiffs”) seek to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained when Alton Chapman was exposed to asbestos. (ECF No. 69 (“Pis.’ Mem.”) at 1). In their original state court complaint, the Plaintiffs advanced ne
Bennett v. Jamespublic domain
737 F.Supp.2d 219 (2010) Donald Mack BENNETT, Plaintiff, v. Dr. Tracey JAMES et al., Defendants. No. 08 Civ. 9979 (GWG). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 16, 2010. *220 Donald Mack Bennett, Valhalla, NY, pro se. Fay Angela Jones, White Plains, NY, for Defendants. OPINION & ORDER
State v. Smithpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 113,828 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. ANTHONY S. SMITH, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. A criminal defe
Accolla v. United States Governmentpublic domain
636 F.Supp.2d 304 (2009) Raymond W. ACCOLLA, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al., Defendants. No. 08 Civ. 7780 (CM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 15, 2009. Raymond Accolla, Butner, NC, pro se. Joseph Nicholas Cordaro, U.S. Attorney's Office, New York, NY, Fay Angela Jones, White Plains, NY, for Defendants. MEMORANDUM DECI
Eric Johnson v. David Maziepublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ Nos. 24-1946, 24-2056 ____________ ERIC JOHNSON; VANESSA WILLIAMS, individually and as executor of the estate of Gladys Williams, deceased; MCARTHUR JONES, individually and as executor of the estate of Janet Jones, deceased; HENRIETTA WILLIAMS; ELIZABETH LAMPKIN; ROBERT DELOACH, i
In the Interest of: J.T.J.public domain
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION THREE IN THE INTEREST OF: J.T.J. ) No. ED108812 ) ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of St. Louis Count
Tjfa, L.P. v. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and BFI Waste Systems of North America, Inc.public domain
JEFF ROSE, Justice, concurring. I join in the majority’s opinion, but write separately to emphasize our deference to the Texas Supreme Court’s expressly stated “reluctan[ce] to conclude that a provision is jurisdictional, absent clear legislative intent to that effect,” 1 which furthers its policy “ ‘to reduce the vulnerability of final judgments to attack on the ground that the
State v. Williamspublic domain
STEWART, J. |Rn this writ grant to docket, the applicant, Timothy D. Williams, was charged by bill of information with conspiracy to possess 400 grams or more of cocaine, a violation of La. R.S. 40:967(F)(l)(c) and La. R.S. 14:26. Williams filed a motion to suppress which the trial court denied. He requested reconsideration which the trial court again denied. Williams now seeks review of the trial court’s ruling. For the follo
Heritage Bank v. McCracken (In re McCracken)public domain
Marvin Isgur, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE *250Heritage Bank filed this adversary proceeding against James W. McCracken to determine the dischargeability of certain debt owed to it by McCracken. Heritage alleges that McCracken's debts to it are nondischargeable pursuant to
McKinney v. Prackpublic domain
DECISION AND ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Pláintiff Darrell McKinney (“Plaintiff’), proceeding pro se, is an inmate currently housed at Great Meadow Correctional Facility. Plaintiff brings the instant action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Defendants Albert Prack, Thomas Griffin, and Steven Wenderlich (collectively “D
In re Admin. Actionspublic domain
This list is being published pursuant to Gov.Bar R. 1(15). The following persons have applied to take the February 2017 Ohio Bar Examination. Allen Taylor Gene Vance Lima Ashland Sarah Kathleen Lewis Austinburg Belmont Carson Lee Schambach St. Clairsville Butler Eric ScottBeutel Liberty Township Marc Edward Bras
People v. Colemanpublic domain
2023 IL App (1st) 210263 No. 1-21-0263 Opinion filed March 6, 2023. First Division ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIR
Nash v. McGinnispublic domain
(2008) Nehemiah NASH, Plaintiff, v. Michael McGINNIS, Stanley Sepiol, James P. Meehan, Gregory T. Manos, Mark J. Sheremeta, Raymond R. Keenan, Douglas D. Westervelt, Kathleen A. Washburn, C.O. Collins, Larry C. Gleason, Christopher F. Kamas, Lieutenant Augustine, Angela Bartlett, Superintendent Artus, Defendants. No. 04-CV-6089L. United States District Court, W.D. New York. Nov
DATE: 07/17/2018 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:31:12 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE REPORT: ctrk_crt SORT BY : COUNTY CODE, LAWYER LAST NAME CRITERIA: COMPLIANCE YEAR END DATE = 12312017 GROUP 3, REINST FEE ASSESSED _______________________________________________________