Cases

M.W.W., the mother, appeals from a judgment modifying custody and ordering her to pay B.W., the father, child support. The parties were divorced in 1997. At the time of the divorce, the parties were awarded joint custody of their two daughters, with the mother having primary physical custody and the father having visitation. On December 10, 2002, the father filed a petition for modification of custody and a petition for contempt, alleging that the mother was restricting and/or

U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v Public Admr. of Suffolk County (2025 NY Slip Op 05009) U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v Public Admr. of Suffolk County 2025 NY Slip Op 05009 Decided on September 17, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant t

Kelly v Herzog (2024 NY Slip Op 01137) Kelly v Herzog 2024 NY Slip Op 01137 Decided on February 29, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

MOORE, Judge, concurring in part and concurring in the result in part. This appeal concerns the issue whether the Marshall Circuit Court (“the trial court”) exceeded its discretion in ordering split custody of the two minor children of Angela Rene Alverson (“the mother”) and Benny Wayne Alverson (“the father”) in a child-custody-modification proceeding.2

619 S.E.2d 830 (2005) STATE of North Carolina v. Angela Deborah LEWIS. No. 558PA04. Supreme Court of North Carolina. October 7, 2005. *831 Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Robert C. Montgomery, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant. Paul M. Green, Durham, for defendant-appellee. BRADY, Justice.

486 F.3d 791 A.W.v.The JERSEY CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS; New Jersey Department of Education; Jeffrey V. Osowski, former Director, Division of Special Education; Barbara Gantwerk, Director, Office of Special Education Programs; Silvia Elias, former. Executive Director of Pupil Personnel Services; Priscilla Petrosky, Associate Superintendent for Special Education; John Iwanowski; Mary Hepburn; Joan Edmiston; Denise Braak; Mary Maceachern; Edward Fa

GEATHERS, J.: Appellants, Courtney Shante Thompson (Mother) and Robert Antonio Guinyard (Father), were tried jointly and convicted of homicide by child abuse (HCA) and unlawful conduct toward a child. They now seek review of their convictions, arguing the trial court erred in denying their respective motions for a directed verdict on each charge because the State failed to present substantial circumstantial evidence of guilt.

HULL, Circuit Judge: *1313 After his guilty plea to possession of child pornography, David Rothenberg appeals from the district court's restitution order requiring him to pay a total of $142,600 in restitution to nine victims depicted in the images of child pornography that he possessed.

*915GEATHERS, J.: **7Appellant Preston Ryan Oates seeks review of his convictions for voluntary manslaughter and possession of a weapon during the commission of a violent crime. Appellant also challenges the denial of his motion for immunity from prosecution pur

900 So.2d 1230 (2004) M.W.W. v. B.W. 2030032. Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama. September 10, 2004. Rehearing Denied November 19, 2004. *1231 Angela A. Cochran of Robert K. Jordan, Attorney, P.C., Fort Payne, for appellant. Submitted on appellant's brief only. YATES, Presiding Judge. M.W.W.,

Safeco Insurance Companies appeals from a trial court's judgment awarding David Blackmon benefits under the *Page 534 Alabama Workers' Compensation Act. We reverse the trial court's judgment. Blackmon has worked in the insurance business since graduating from college in 1973. During the almost 28 years between Blackmon's graduation and the time of trial, Blackmon worked for several insurance companies before working for Safeco. For one of t

759 F.Supp.2d 654 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, v. Razhon A. DICKEY, Defendant. Criminal No. 3:2009-34. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. January 4, 2011. John J. Valkovci, Jr., United States Attorney's Office, Johnstown, PA, for United States of America. Marketa Sims, Federal Public Defender's Office, Pittsburgh, PA, Jerome J. Kaharick, Jer

OPINION OF THE COURT RENDELL, Circuit Judge. In this appeal, we reexamine our holding in W.B. v. Matula, 67 F.3d 484 (3d Cir.1995), that an action can be maintained against school officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violations of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”),

719 F.Supp. 1217 (1989) UNITED STATES GOLD CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 88 Civ. 5692 (PKL). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 31, 1989. *1218 Jerrold E. Hyams, New York City, Andrew R. Colmant, of counsel, for plaintiff. Graham & James, New York City, Maureen

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX ELEANOR ABRAHAM, ET AL., CASE NO. SX-11-CV-0000550 Plaintiffs, ACTION FOR: DAMAGES vs. ST. CROIX RENAISSANCE GROUP, LLLP, Defendant. NOTICE OF ENTRY OF MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER TO: JUDGES AND MAGISTRATE JUDGES OF THE SUPERIOR COURT LEE J. ROHN, ESQ. JOEL H. HOLT, ESQ. CARL J. HARTMANN III, ESQ. IT/LAW CLERKS/LAW LIBRARY ORDER BOOK PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on February 03, 2020 a(n) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER dated Fe

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge: I.Introduction...............................................................347 II.Facts.....................................................................349 A. Defendant’s Childhood..................................................349