Cases

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

(1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT; AND (2) DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS Hon. Michael M. Anello, United States District Judge On September 14, 2017, Plaintiff Matthew Lopez ("Plaintiff"), individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, filed this putative class action against Defendant Stages

MEMORANDUM McHUGH, Judge. The deregulation of retail electricity markets in Pennsylvania and several other states has produced a large number of putative class actions alleging various unfair business practices, with mixed results.1 This is one such case. Plaintiff Steven Landau claims that Defendant Viridian Energy PA LLC (“Viridian”) lured him from his local utility company by mak

DEAN D. PREGERSON, United States District Judge Presently before the court is Plaintiffs Disney Enterprises, Inc., Buena Vista Home Entertainment, Inc., Lucasfilm Ltd., LLC, and MVL Film Finance LLC (collectively, "Disney")'s Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Having considered the submissions of the parties and heard oral argument, the court grants the motion and adopts the following Order. I. Background</

635 F.Supp.2d 227 (2009) Roy TUCCILLO, an individual, Plaintiff, v. GEISHA NYC, LLC, doing business as Japonais and OSSS Hospitality NYC LLC, Defendants. No. 09-CV-2022 (JFB)(WDW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. July 22, 2009. *230 Arnold L. Kert, Esq., Garden City, NY, for Plaintiff. Sean P. Casey, Esq. and

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

679 F.Supp.2d 1203 (2009) KAPUNAKEA PARTNERS and Waiehu Beach Partners, Plaintiffs, v. EQUILON ENTERPRISES LLC, dba Shell Oil Products US, Defendant. Civ. No. 09-00340 ACK-KSC. United States District Court, D. Hawai`i. November 23, 2009. *1204 David Geoffrey Brittin, Frederick W. Rohlfing, III, Case Lombardi & Pettit, Honolul

FILED 15-0547 7/24/2015 5:49:28 PM tex-6223072 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK

THIS OPINION IS A PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB Hearing: July 12, 2018 Mailed: December 31, 2018 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board _____ TiVo Brands LLC

THIS OPINION IS A PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB Hearing: July 12, 2018 Mailed: December 31, 2018 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board _____ TiVo Brands LLC

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION LUCY H. KOH, District Judge. Plaintiff Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) brings this motion for a preliminary injunction seeking to enjoin Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) from “making, using, offering to sell, or selling within the United States, or importing

RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ENFORCE JUDGMENT I. INTRODUCTION This case returns to this Court one year after the grant of summary judgment to Plaintiff Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Ferring") due to Defendant U.S. Food and Drug Administration's ("the FDA") surprise change of position regarding the chemical classific

KEVIN J. CAREY, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE *203The Plaintiffs3 in this adversary proceeding filed their First Amended Complaint (Adv. D.I. 12) (the "Complaint") on July 17, 2018, asserting four counts against the Debtors: (1) Seeking a declaratory judgment that the Plaintiffs hold pre

Case: 23-50303 Document: 81-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/28/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-50303

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT GILLIAN DAVIDSON; SAMUEL No. 22-16656 DAVIDSON, as individuals, on behalf of themselves, the general public, and D.C. No. those similarly situated, 3:22-cv-01050-RS Plaintiffs-Appellants, OPINION v. SPROUT FOODS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United S

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) KAROLINA RAI et al., ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 21-cv-863-TSC

Case: 23-40653 Document: 212-2 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/17/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED ____________ January 17, 202

In the United States Court of Federal Claims SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORP., Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, No. 17-cv-825 Defendant, Filed: August 6, 2021 and MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Intervenor-Defendant, and L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

745 F.Supp.2d 1101 (2010) EDGE GAMES, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. ELECTRONIC ARTS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. No. C 10-02614 WHA. United States District Court, N.D. California. October 1, 2010. *1103 Daniel Mcartur Shafer, Christopher D. Banys, The Lanier Law Firm, P.C., Palo Alto, CA, for Plaintif

Opinion KANE, J. When their family home in Fresno, California (the Property), was foreclosed on pursuant to a forged or fraudulent second deed of trust, Rebecca and Victorino Baquiran filed an action to quiet title to the Property and recorded a lis pendens. Thereafter, the party that had purchased the Property in good faith at the foreclosure sale, La Jolla Group II and its partners, Leroy Kleim and Alan Boyaj