⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

11 opinions for “Angie Stover”

Oregon Supreme Court · 2015-10-08 · Published · cited 2× · 358 Or. 49; 359 P.3d 1187; 2015 Ore. LEXIS 723
*51 BALDWIN, J. In this mandamus proceeding, we consider a challenge to the validity of a trial court’s Sell order directing relator, Oregon State Hospital (OSH), to administer involuntary medication to the adverse party (defendant) in a criminal case for the purpose of restoring defend
Shavers v. Statepublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) · 1999-05-12 · Published · cited 63× · 985 S.W.2d 284; 1999 WL 55164
985 S.W.2d 284 (1999) Curtis Wayne SHAVERS, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 09-97-182 CR Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont. Submitted December 17, 1998. Decided February 3, 1999. Discretionary Review Refused May 12, 1999. *286 Steven M. Hollis, Jasper, for appellant.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009-03-20 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE June 9, 2008 Session EDWIN O. MARTIN, ET AL. v. CARL NASH, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Putnam County No. 2001-282 Ronald Thurman, Chancellor No. M2007-02375-COA-R3-CV - Filed March 20, 2009 Members of family in whose name a cemetery was established brought suit
Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992-12-17 · Published · cited 6× · 604 N.E.2d 671; 1992 Ind. App. LEXIS 1816; 1992 WL 368959
604 N.E.2d 671 (1992) Dick PLACE and Angie Place, Appellants-Plaintiffs, v. SAGAMORE CENTER, INC., Appellee-Defendant. No. 54A01-9208-CV-280. Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District. December 17, 1992. Transfer Denied March 5, 1993. *672 C. Warren Holland, Michael W. Holland, Holland & Holland, Morris L.
Oregon Supreme Court · 2015-10-08 · Published · cited 0×
No. 40 October 8, 2015 49 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON OREGON STATE HOSPITAL, Relator, and STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL ARMAUGH BUTTS, Defendant-Adverse Party. (CC 111002; SC S063003) En Banc Original proceedin
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1988-05-10 · Published · cited 5× · 86 B.R. 733; 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 647; 1988 WL 45741
86 B.R. 733 (1988) In re the GEORGIA GRANITE COMPANY, INC., Debtor. COGGINS GRANITE, INC. and Coggins Land Company, Individually and Collectively, Movants, v. The GEORGIA GRANITE COMPANY, INC., Respondent. The GEORGIA GRANITE COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, v. COGGINS GRANITE, INC., Coggins Land Company, and First Union National Bank of Georgia, f/d/b/a First Georgia Bank, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. A86-09123-WHD,
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2022-09-01 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) IN RE MATCH GROUP, INC. ) CONSOLIDATED DERIVATIVE LITIGATION ) C.A. No. 2020-0505-MTZ ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: May 4, 2022 Date Decided: September 1, 2022 Michael Hanrahan, J. Clayton Athey, Corinne E. Amato, Kevin H. Davenport, Jaso
Kier v. Belcherpublic domain
Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1988-05-16 · Published · cited 0× · 28 Fla. Supp. 2d 86
OPINION OF THE COURT W. LOWELL BRAY, JR., Circuit Judge. FINAL DECLARATORY JUDGMENT THIS CAUSE came before the Court for nonjury trial on March 28, 29, 30 and 31, 1988, upon the plaintiffs’ Complaint for Declaratory Judgment for Unconscionable Rent against the defendant, DOUGLAS H. BELCHER, d/b/a CLUB WILDWOOD MOBILE HOME VILLAGE. Plaintiffs’ Complaint seeks a declaration th
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-02-06 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 04-14-00061-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS 04-15-00061-CV SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 2/6/2015 3:33:46 PM
Barnett v. Hudsonpublic domain
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1924-12-04 · Published · cited 0× · 125 S.E. 573; 130 S.C. 300; 1924 S.C. LEXIS 92
December 4, 1924. The opinion of the Court was delivered by The Court is entirely satisfied with the reasoning and conclusion of the Circuit Judge. In addition to the authorities cited by him, the case of Wilson v. Poston (S.C.),123 S.E., 849, appears to be conclusive of the question. The judgment of this Court is that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed. MESSRS. JUSTICES WATTS, FRASER and MARION concur. MR. CHIEF JUST