Cases

ORDER Anna Smith challenges the collection of her metadata pursuant to § 215 of the *1241 USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-56, sec. 215, § 501, 115 Stat. 272, 287-88. That section expired on June 1, 2015, but was revived by the USA FREEDOM Act of 2015, Pub. L. No. 114-23, tit. I, 129 Stat. 268, 269

DUNCAN, J. In this criminal case, defendant appeals a judgment convicting her of seven misdemeanors, all of which arose from a traffic accident. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in giving a jury instruction regarding the duties of a driver and in failing to clarify the instruction. She argues that the instruction was improper and its use created a likelihood that the jury would convict her of the six charged crime

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Khalil Abbas-Ghaleb, Appellant-Respondent, v. Anna Ghaleb, Respondent-Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2022-000505 Appeal From Aiken County Vicki J. Snelgrove, Family Court Judge Opinion No. 6057 Heard October 10, 2023 – Filed April 29, 2024

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Khalil Abbas-Ghaleb, Appellant-Respondent, v. Anna Ghaleb, Respondent-Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2022-000505 Appeal From Aiken County Vicki J. Snelgrove, Family Court Judge Opinion No. 6057 Heard October 10, 2023 – Filed April 29, 2024

NUMBER 13-24-00208-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ANNA MERCEDEZ GUTIERREZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ON APPEAL FR

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. Anna F. Robinson filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition in the Southern District of Illinois seeking a discharge of unsecured debts. Ms. Robinson claimed an exemption for a rare, first edition Book of Mormon under the Illinois personal property exemption statute, 735 ILCS 5/12— 1001(a), which provides an exemption for a bible. The bankruptcy court denied the

I respectfully dissent from the majority decision to reverse the Deputy Commissioner's Opinion and Award. The majority finds as fact that "[p]laintiff was diagnosed with asbestosis and was advised of this condition June 15, 1989." This finding is not supported by the evidence in the Record. Plaintiff stated in his answers to interrogatories that he was told by Dr. David Shanks in June 1989 that he had an occupational disease. According to Dr. Shanks' records, he did not begin seeing p

2014 UT App 269 _________________________________________________________ THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS IN THE MATTER OF THE ANNA BLACKHAM AAGARD TRUST, ET AL. W. KIM AAGARD, Petitioner and Appellant, v. DIANE A. JORGENSEN, Respondent and Appellee. Opinion No. 20120789-CA Filed Novemb

24-425 (L) Kurtz v. Kimberly-Clark Corp. 1 United States Court of Appeals 2 for the Second Circuit 3 _________________ 4 5 August Term 2024 6 7 Argued: March 19, 2025 8 Decided: July 1, 2025 9 10 Nos. 24-425

FLYNN, J., pro tempore In this post-conviction case, petitioner seeks relief from his conviction for first-degree rape, ORS 163.375. On appeal, petitioner assigns error to the post-conviction court’s denial of two claims for relief that are based on the allegation that petitioner was restrained by a leg brace during his criminal trial without findings to justify the restraint—both a “stand-alone” claim that the restraint viola

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 17, 2013 Session IN RE: ANNA L. J. Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Williamson County No. 37304 Sharon Guffee, Judge No. M2013-00561-COA-R3-JV - Filed March 20, 2014 Husband and wife in dependent and neglect proceeding who were each held in criminal contempt for

ORTEGA, P. J. Defendant appeals his judgment of conviction of two counts of first-degree sodomy, ORS 163.405, and four counts of first-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.427. He raises three assignments of error, all of which concern the trial court’s exclusion of portions of testimony from defendant’s expert witness, a neuropsychologist, who testified about what he believed to be the flaws of the investigatory interview of the five

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MICHELLE CLARK, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 19-394 (JEB) SONNY PERDUE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Michelle Clark, who is blind, has been trying — for over four years — to get the Department of Agriculture to resolve her administrative com

911 N.E.2d 1084 (2009) 392 Ill. App.3d 179 Barbara Marie GASS, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Patricia A. Pike, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ANNA HOSPITAL CORPORATION, d/b/a Union County Hospital, Defendant-Appellant, and Community Health Systems, Inc., and Dr. Dale Vorbrich, Defendants (Dr. Raja C. Maddipoti, of Prairie Cardiovascular Consultants Ltd., Respondent in Discovery).

GARRETT, J. In this post-conviction case, petitioner alleges that he received ineffective and inadequate assistance of counsel when his trial attorney made a statement on the record that contradicted petitioner’s own representations to the court. The post-conviction court rejected petitioner’s argument and denied the petition for relief. We affirm. Petitioner was indicted on one count of third-degree rape an

No. 16 June 29, 2023 177 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON Susan CLARK, for herself and/or on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellant, v. EDDIE BAUER LLC and Eddie Bauer Parent, LLC, Appellees. (United States Court of Ap

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT BRYAN ALBRIGHT, JAMIE WEITT, : No. 666 MAL 2019 DONALD BARSHINGER, MINDY : BARSHINGER, BRIAN BROMMER, KELLY : BROMMER, ELLIE BROMMER, CAMRYN : Petition for Allowance of Appeal BROMMER, MAX BROMMER, TYLER : from the Order of the Superior Court BROMMER, GENE CLARK, LINDA CLARK, : WILLIAM KOPF,JR. BRIAN MESHEY, LISA : MESHEY, ZACHARY MESHEY, DEYCON

OPINION AND ORDER WHEELER, Judge. Plaintiffs in this rails-to-trails case are Kansas real property owners who claim to hold a fee simple interest in land subject to a railroad right-of-way. Their Fifth Amendment takings claims have been joined in one action for the resolution of common issues of federal and Kansas law. The ease involves an 8.13-mile corridor of land just north of Marysville, Kansas i

287 S.W.3d 567 (2008) Anna CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee. No. CR 07-1276. Supreme Court of Arkansas. September 25, 2008. *570 John Wesley Hall, Jr., Little Rock, AR, for appellant. Dustin McDaniel, Att'y Gen., by: Kent G. Holt, Ass't Att'y Gen., for appellee. ANNABELLE CLINTON IMBER, Justice.

HARRIS, C.M., Senior Judge. Appellant, Privilege Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange (“PURE”), filed an action for declaratory judgment seeking a determination that an excess liability policy issued to Appellees, Coy and Tabitha Clark, did not cover the Clarks’ son, Brigham Clark. PURE also sought rescission of the excess policy, alleging that there was a material misrepresentation made on insureds’ behalf during the applicat