Cases

*544 Skoglund, J. ¶ 1. South Burlington School District (District) appeals from an environmental court decision approving Howard Center, Inc.’s application for interior renovations to an existing medical office to accommodate a new methadone clinic. The District contends the court erroneously concluded that:

LANDAU, P. J. Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for nine counts of robbery in the first degree with a firearm, ORS 164.415; nine counts of robbery in the second degree with a firearm, ORS 164.405; nine counts of unlawful use of a weapon with a firearm, ORS 166.220; and one count of felon in possession of a firearm, ORS 166.270. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion for a new trial and, in a supple

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Anna M. Juarez brought this action against her former employer, Ameri-tech Mobile Communications, Inc. (“AMCI”), seeking to hold AMCI liable for the sexual harassment inflicted upon her by another AMCI employee, Peter Shkrutz. The district court granted summary judgment for AMCI on all counts, and Juarez appeals. 746 F.Supp. 798. We affirm.

ORDER PER CURIAM: L.M. and M.M. appeal the trial court’s judgment denying their petition to transfer custody for the purpose of adopting their grandchildren and granting the petition for adoption of J.P. and N.P., the foster parents. For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

573 S.E.2d 253 (2002) Dorothy T. HOWARD, by and through the Administratrix of her Estate, Plaintiff, v. Robert D. VAUGHN, Jr., M.D.; James A. Watkins, M.D.; Louis H. Zbinden, III, M.D.; Dilworth Surgical Group, P.A. o/k/a Dilworth Surgical Specialists, P.A.; Mercy Hospital, Inc.; Carolinas Health Care System d/b/a Mercy Hospital, Inc., Defendants. No. COA02-28. Court of Appeals of North Carolina.</

OPINION SMITH, Chief Judge. This ease is before the court on defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, for Summary Judgment and plaintiffs Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs claim concerns the Social Security “offset” being applied by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service against her Military Survivor Benefit Plan annuity procured by her late husband.

Goff, Justice. This case arises from a tragic accident where an uninsured driver under the influence of methamphetamine struck and killed Brian Harris who was mowing his home's lawn near the roadside. Harris's estate sought uninsured motorist benefits under his employer's commercial auto policy, claiming he qualified for coverage under the policy term "others we

[Cite as Anna Holdings, L.L.C. v. McClanahan, 2019-Ohio-4697.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT CHAMPAIGN COUNTY ANNA HOLDINGS, LLC : : Plaintiff-Appellant : Appellate Case No. 2019-CA-11 : v.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 19–1837 Submitted October 21, 2021—Filed December 10, 2021 ANNA SOTHMAN, Appellant, vs. STATE OF IOWA, Appellee. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Marion County, Michael K. Jacobsen, Judge. Applicant seeks further review of the court of appeals decision affirming the district court’s denial of her applica

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 24-0278 Filed June 18, 2025 IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF KENNETH M. HOWARD AND ANNA V. HOWARD Upon the Petition of KENNETH M. HOWARD, Petitioner-Appellant, And Concerning ANNA V. HOWARD, Respondent-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Coleman McAllister, Judge. A

675 F.3d 832 (2012) M.D., by next friend Sarah R. STUKENBERG; D.I., by next friend Nancy G. Pofahl; Z.H., by next friend Carla B. Morrison; S.A., by next friend Javier Solis; A.M., by next friend Jennifer Talley; J.S., by next friend Anna J. Ricker; K.E., by next friend John W. Cliff, Jr.; D.P., by next friend Karen J. Langsley; T.C., by next friend Paul Swacina, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Rick PERRY, in his official capacity as Governor of the Sta

{Nature of Proceeding: Debtors-Defendants’ Requests for Sanctions (Docs. ##67, 139, 233, 288, and 290)} OPINION 28 U.S.C. § 1927 John J. Thomas, Bankruptcy Judge A request by Debtors/Defendants, Christopher and Michele Paige, has been made for sanctions against Lerner Master Fund, LLC, (LMF), attorneys under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1927, which reads:</

Howard v. IOMAXIS, LLC, 2022 NCBC 76. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG 18 CVS 11679 KELLY C. HOWARD and FIFTH THIRD BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS CO-TRUSTEES OF THE RONALD E. HOWARD REVOCABLE TRUST U/A DATED FEBRUARY 9, 2016, AS AMENDED AND RESTATED, Plaintiffs, ORDER AND OPINION ON IOMAXIS

Matter of Vicki M. A. (Lynda P.--Lisa P.) (2023 NY Slip Op 03916) Matter of Vicki M. A. (Lynda P.--Lisa P.) 2023 NY Slip Op 03916 Decided on July 26, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Burea

ORDER MARCIA MORALES HOWARD, United States District Judge THIS CAUSE is brought by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), pursuant to its authority under section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC Act), 15 U.S.C. § 45, against Defendants Lanier Law LLC, Fortress Law Group LLC, Surety Law Group LLP (Surety), Liberty & Trust Law Group of Florida LLC (Liberty & Trust), Fortress Law Group, PC (Fort

Howard v. IOMAXIS, LLC, 2021 NCBC 82. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG 18 CVS 11679 KELLY C. HOWARD and FIFTH THIRD BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS CO-TRUSTEES OF THE RONALD E. HOWARD REVOCABLE TRUST U/A DATED FEBRUARY 9, 2016, AS AMENDED AND RESTATED, Plaintiffs, ORDER AND

2025 WI 36 TONY EVERS, et al., Petitioners, v. HOWARD MARKLEIN, et al., Respondents. No. 2023AP2020-OA Decided July 8, 2025 ORIGINAL ACTION KAROFSKY, C.J., delivered the majority opinion of the Court, in which ANN WALSH BR

*150 Spearman, J. ¶1 — Anna Chester suffered an adverse reaction after being tattooed with ink that appears to have been contaminated with bacteria when the tattoo artist received it from the distributor. Chester brought negligence claims against the tattoo artist and the tattoo parlor, arguing that they had

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1719 Doc: 44 Filed: 05/30/2023 Pg: 1 of 50 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1684 DARRYL HOWARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF DURHAM; DARRELL DOWDY, in his individual and official capacities; MICHELE SOUCIE,

08/21/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs May 2, 2018 CHRISTOPHER A. HOWARD v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dyer County No. 10-CR-160 R. Lee Moore, Jr., Judge ___________________________________