Cases

446 F.Supp.2d 828 (2006) Annie ROGERS, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 03 C 6818. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 1, 2006. *829 *830 *831

PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judge, with whom WILBUR K. MILLER and DANAHER, Circuit Judges, join (dissenting). I In Respect to the Contractor We do not find in the question we must decide the abstruse legal problems found there by our brethren. We would affirm the District Court, because we agree with the trial judge upon the simple p

Appendix A Department of Justice Chart Documenting Sentences in Capitol Breach Cases Monday, January 6, 2025 SENTENCES IMPOSED IN CASES ARISING OUT OF THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6, 2021 Disclaimer: Those relying on information contained in this document should verify all information for accuracy Table 1: Cases in which the government recommended a probation sentence without home detention 1 0F Defendant Ca

OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge This case arises from the grueling relationship between Karla Saunders and her former employer, the Small Business Administration (SBA). After five amended complaints, Ms. Saunders now alleges tot she was discriminated against on the basis of her race (African American) and sex (female) and retali

42 F.Supp.2d 334 (1999) Sandra Ortiz-Del VALLE, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION, Defendant. No. 96 CIV. 2864(SHS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 31, 1999. *335 *336 Patricia M. Flannery, Thornton, Early & Naumes, LLP, Boston, MA, for plaintiff. Jos

628 N.E.2d 844 (1993) 256 Ill. App.3d 825 195 Ill.Dec. 380 Sharon GLENN, Betty J. Fields, Annie J. Finley, Betty A. Lange, Evangeline Belton and Edward Sweik, on behalf of themselves and all other employees of the City of Chicago, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Cross-Appellees, v. The CITY OF CHICAGO, a municipal corporation, Jesse E. Hoskins, Commissioner of the Department of Personnel, Judith Walker, Comm

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Oklahoma county, in an action brought by Mamie Phelan, plaintiff, against certain named defendants, to quiet title to real estate described as lots 25 and 26 in block 14, Lawrence Place addition to Oklahoma City. Prior to 1924 this property was owned jointly by J.L. and John Carter. June 16, 1924, the county treasurer executed a resale tax deed to one John T. Phelan. This deed is admittedly void. April 24, 1929, Phelan c

390 F.Supp. 545 (1975) Annie TYSON et al. v. Nicholas NORTON, Individually and as Commissioner of the State of Connecticut Welfare Department, et al. Civ. No. H-74-95. United States District Court, D. Connecticut. February 24, 1975. *546 *547 Marilyn K. Katz, and Ira Horowitz, Bridgeport Legal

Mr. Justice Carter delivered the opinion of the court: Plaintiff in error, Edmund Jordan, was found guilty of murder, in the criminal court of Cook county, March i, 1895, and sentenced for life to the penitentiary, where he has since been and now is. The indictment was in four counts. The first two counts charged plaintiff in error and Annie Mahoney with the murder of one Alf

Mr. Justice Pam delivered the opinion of the court. Though many errors were assigned, only three are argued in complainant’s brief, which are as follows: (1) That the court erred in admitting in evidence the document known as defendant’s Exhibit B, because said document was not sufficiently authenticated and identified as a certificate of the oa

Christian, J., dissenting: On the 30th day of September, 1907, The Ocean V ew Cottage Company, that owned a tract of land in Norfolk county which it had surveyed, platted and recorded a copy of the plat pursuant to section 2510-a of the Code of 1904, by deed, in consideration of $450.00, conveyed to W. J. Scultatus three fifty-foot lots, numbered 19, 20 and 21, in block No. six (6), as shown and designated on it

The primary question for determination here is whether or not the defendants in error, without negligence on their part, may be held liable in damages for the destruction or injury *Page 157 to property occasioned by the escape of salt water from ponds constructed and used by them in the operation of their oil wells. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals (62 S.W.2d 491), and will be but briefl

Fowler, S. This is an appeal to the jurisdiction of the surrogate for relief against an alleged mistake on the part of the testatrix. It involves the whole scope of the surrogate’s present jurisdiction in a proceeding for probate and construction. The arguments of counsel in this cause suggest to my mind important questions the consideration of which can no longer be postponed or passed over by me. The arguments of counsel have b

845 P.2d 1040 (1993) PARKER LAND AND CATTLE COMPANY, Appellant (Petitioner), v. WYOMING GAME AND FISH COMMISSION, Appellee (Respondent). No. 91-147. Supreme Court of Wyoming. January 22, 1993. Rehearing Denied February 24, 1993. Stanley K. Hathaway, Brent R. Kunz and Rebecca Hellbaum of Hathaway, Speight, Kunz, Trautwein & Barrett, Cheyenne, for

105 F.Supp. 292 (1952) PENFIELD v. DAVIS, Collector of Internal Revenue et al. Civ. No. 6708. United States District Court N. D. Alabama, S. D. May 7, 1952. *293 Roberts & McInnis, Washington, D. C., and Cabaniss & Johnston, Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiff. Ellis N. Slack, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Andrew D. Sharpe

For balance due, as claimed, on 251 tons of hay taken by J. G. Smith, acting assistant quartermaster, from the decedent. Dismissed. Judgments, in addition to the foregoing, were rendered in favor of sundry claimants under the joint resolution of Congress of February 28, 1867, giving 20 per centum additional compensation to certain civil employes of the Government in the city of Washington. Of these the following jud

DISSENTING OPINION. LAMM, J. — Prepared on assignment as a principal opinion, it failed to receive the concurrence of a majority of my brethren, and the .case was reassigned to my learned brother Gantt. Something of substance, I think, is to he said against the conclusion reached by him, which justifies resubmitting this opinion as a, dissenting one. Gildersleeve was sentenced by the circuit c

ROGERS, Circuit Judge. This case involves the last will and testament of Theodore M. Davis, who at the time of his death on February 23, 1915, had his domicile at Newport, in the state of Rhode Island. His will was dated August 14, 1911, and a codicil thereto was dated October 4, 1911, and both were admitted to probate in the Newport probate court. Letters testamentary were issued to Thomas L. Manson, one of the two exe