Cases

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-KA-01383-COA JEREMY JEROME BROWN APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/18/2019 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. MARK SHELDON DUNCAN COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: NESHOBA COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2020-KA-00337-COA JEREMY JEROME BROWN APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/20/2020 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. MARK SHELDON DUNCAN COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: NESHOBA COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY

SYKES, Circuit Judge. Anthony Brown, Jerome Coleman, and Malcolm Gougis were indicted with three other men on charges of conspiracy and attempt to possess cocaine with intent to distribute and theft of government property. At the time of the crimes, the defendants were current or former law enforcement officers and were targeted in a sting operation set up by the government with

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 14, 2012 Decided June 25, 2013 No. 10-3074 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. JEROME HAMPTON, ALSO KNOWN AS JAY, APPELLANT Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:07-cr-001

356 S.C. 496 (2003) 589 S.E.2d 781 The STATE, Respondent, v. Anthony Jerome BROWN, Appellant. No. 3702. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard November 4, 2003. Decided November 24, 2003. *499 Assistant Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of SC Office of Appellate Defense, of Colum

WOOD, Circuit Judge. In Spano v. Boeing Co., 633 F.3d 574 (7th Cir.2011), we confronted for the first time the question whether an action for breach of fiduciary duty under Section 502(a)(2) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(2), may be maintained as a class action when a defined-contribution retirement savings

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT ANTHONY JEROME THOMAS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. )

Accordingly, the Court concludes that the claims in the current litigation are not barred by the doctrine of res judicata. B. FTCA Judgment Bar Defendants next argue that because this Court dismissed the FTCA claim in the 2015 Litigation (Count V), plaintiffs' current claims are barred by the FTCA's "judgment bar,"

NO. 07-11-00397-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL B ----------------------------------------------------

NO. 07-11-00397-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL B OCTOBER 27, 2011 IN RE JEROME D. BROWN, RELATOR Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS Re

Ferrara v Jerome Zisfein (2019 NY Slip Op 00096) Ferrara v Jerome Zisfein 2019 NY Slip Op 00096 Decided on January 9, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant

671 F.3d 1052 (2012) Kristin M. PERRY; Sandra B. Stier; Paul T. Katami; Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Plaintiffs-Appellees, City and County of San Francisco, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edmund G. BROWN, Jr., in his official capacity as Governor of California; Kamala D. Harris, in her official capacity as Attorney General of California; Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health & State

VIRGINIA: In the Court of Appeals of Virginia on Tuesday the 13th day of May, 2025. PUBLISHED Terence Jerome Richardson, s/k/a Terrence Jerome Richardson, Petitioner, against Record No. 0361-21-2 Commonwealth of Virginia, Respondent.

SUMMARY ORDER Thurman Jerome Brown appeals from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Mishler, J.) granting defendants’ motions dismiss for failure to state a claim. We affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the district court. See Brown v. United States, No. 00-CV-7182 (JM) (E.D.N.Y. May 1, 2002). While the district court m

291 F.Supp.2d 3 (2003) Charlene BROWN, individually and on behalf of the Estate of Doris Kutsmeda, Marie Serrazina, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. PHILIP MORRIS INCORPORATED, Liggett Group, individually and as successor to Liggett & Myers, Inc.; R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company; Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, individually and as successor by merger to the American Tobacco Company and its

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 20, 2003 Session ANTHONY JEROME STOKES v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County No. 211-043 Douglas A. Meyer, Judge No. E2002-02597-CCA-R3-PC July 7, 2003 The petitioner, Anthony Jerome Stokes

704 N.E.2d 740 (1998) 301 Ill. App.3d 919 235 Ill.Dec. 167 Frank O. BUTLER II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MAYER, BROWN AND PLATT, Defendant-Appellee. No. 1-97-4639. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Third Division. November 25, 1998. Rehearing Denied December 21, 1998.

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs August 21, 2001 ANTHONY JEROME STOKES v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County No. 211043 Douglas A. Meyer, Judge No. E2000-03232-CCA-R3-PC October 15, 2001 In 1995, the petitioner ente

OPINION SHARON G. LEE, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which CORNELIA A. CLARK and HOLLY KIRBY, JJ., joined. GARY R. WADE, J., filed a separate dissenting opinion. HOLLY KIRBY, J., filed a separate concurring opinion. JEFFREY S. BIVINS, J., not participating. We granted review in this case to determine whether a trial judge is required to give a jury

Petition for rehearing denied.