Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ANTHONY V. NIGRO, No. 12-57262 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:11-cv-01541- MMA-JMA SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., Defendant-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from t

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ANTHONY V. NIGRO, No. 12-57262 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:11-cv-01541- MMA-JMA SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., Defendant-Appellee. ORDER AND

ORDER The opinion in the above-captioned matter filed on February 25, 2015, and published at 778 F.3d 1096, is amended and replaced by the amended opinion filed concurrently with this order. With this amendment, no petitions for rehearing or requests for amendment will be accepted. OPINION GOULD, Circuit Judge: Anthony Nigro appeals the district court’s entry of sum

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KEO RATHA; SEM KOSAL; SOPHEA No. 18-55041 BUN; YEM BAN; NOL NAKRY; PHAN SOPHEA; SOK SANG, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 2:16-cv-04271- JFW-AS v. PHATTHANA SEAFOOD CO., LTD.; OPINION S.S. FROZEN FOOD CO., LTD.; RUBICON RESOURCES, LLC; WALES AND CO. UNIVERSE LTD.,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KEO RATHA; SEM KOSAL; SOPHEA No. 18-55041 BUN; YEM BAN; NOL NAKRY; PHAN SOPHEA; SOK SANG, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 2:16-cv-04271- JFW-AS v. PHATTHANA SEAFOOD CO., LTD.; ORDER AND S.S. FROZEN FOOD CO., LTD.; AMENDED RUBICON RESOURCES, LLC; WALES

(2008) Zelma HINDMAN, Plaintiff, v. Donald THOMPSON, Creek County, and The State of Oklahoma, Defendants. No. 05-CV-306-TCK-PJC. United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma. March 4, 2008. OPINION AND ORDER TERENCE KERN, District Judge. Before the Court is the State of Oklahoma's ("State") Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 37), Supplem

ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND; DENYING MOTION TO SEAL Re: Dkt. Nos. 44, 67, 77 Donna M. Ryu, United States Magistrate Judge This action is an employment dispute between Plaintiff Lawanda Anderson and her employer, Defendant City and County of San Francisco (“CCSF”). Plaintiff asserts five claims for relief: feder

720 A.2d 1032 (1998) Ronald B. EMERICH, Administrator of the Estate of Teresa M. Hausler, Appellant, v. PHILADELPHIA CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, INC. and Albert Einstein Medical Center, Appellees. Ronald B. EMERICH, Administrator of the Estate of Teresa M. Hausler, Appellant, v. PHILADELPHIA CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, INC., Albert Einstein Healthcare Foundation, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Harvey Friedrich, ACSW, Anthony J. S

*965ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Anthony W. Ishii, SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE This is an employment discrimination dispute between Plaintiff Juan Carlos Robles (“Robles”) and his former employer, Defendant Agreserves, Inc. (“Agre-serves”), his former ■ foreman Defendant George Campo (“Campo”),1 and his f

769 A.2d 1131 (2001) Donald J. DUCHESS and Catherine A. Duchess, Appellees, v. LANGSTON CORPORATION, Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued March 6, 2000. Decided April 19, 2001. *1132 Joseph J. Bosick, Pittsburgh, for Langston Corporation. Michael T. Collins, Pittsburgh, for Donald & Catherine Duchess. <