Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Anthony Ogden and Maria R Ogden”
Matter of Maria R. (Daniel R.)public domain
Matter of Maria R. (Daniel R.) (2023 NY Slip Op 01453) Matter of Maria R. (Daniel R.) 2023 NY Slip Op 01453 Decided on March 17, 2023 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judicia
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
All Justices concur. Attachment Adams County 30678-01 CLE Jill Nicole Holtzclaw *2416061 W US Hwy 224 Decatur, Indiana 46733 Allen County 2658-02 CLE <
ACCEPTED 15-25-00028-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/27/2025 4:56 PM NO. 15-25-00028-CV-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
Demutiis v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER ALLEGRA, Judge. Nicholas R. Demutiis, a New York City police officer, was off duty, but en route to his precinct, when the car he was driving was broadsided by a vehicle being chased, at a high rate of speed, by two patrol cars. Officer Demutiis died as a result of this crash. His family seeks compensation under the Public Safety Officers’ Benefits Act (PSOBA or the Act), 42 U.S.C. §§ 3796-3
United States v. Deleonpublic domain
James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1277THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Restricted Motion to Obtain Physical and Mental Health Records, filed March 27, 2018 (Doc. 1985)("Health Records Motion"); and (ii) the Motion in Opposition to Disclosure of the Defendant's Redacted Mental and Physical Healt
Estate of Aguirre ex rel. Aguirre v. Korugapublic domain
ALARCÓN, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent. Prefatory Statement Under compulsion of the unpublished decision in Estate of Aguirre v. Koruga, 42 Fed.Appx. 73 (9th Cir.2002) (“Aguirre I”), the district court permitted the jury to consider extrinsic evidence, including oral testimony, that prior to his death, Ana Maria Koruga’s father, Tomas B. Aguirre, author
ACCEPTED 04-15-00118-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEAL
Jeffrey Sorensen v. WD-40 Companypublic domain
FLAUM, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Jeffrey Sorensen is the founder and CEO of Inhibitor Technology Corporation, which produces a line of rust-inhibiting products containing a substance called volatile corrosion inhibitor (“VCI”). This line of products is branded with the federally registered trademark THE INHIBITOR. That word mark is owned by Sorensen; he also claims common law trade
Wagner v. Oliva (In re Vaughan Co. Realtors)public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERT H. JACOBVITZ, Bankruptcy Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion for Summary Judgment” or “Trustee’s Motion”). See Docket Nos. 49 & 50. In each of the above-captioned adversary proceedings, Plaintiff Judith Wagner, Chapter 11 Trustee of the bankruptcy estate of the Vaughan Company Realtors (“Trust
In re CWNevada LLCpublic domain
Honorable Mike K. Nakagawa, United States Bankruptcy Judge On May 15, 2019, the court heard Creditor 4Front Advisors LLC's Motion to Dismiss Bankruptcy Petition or, Alternatively, Motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay to Allow Receivership and Contempt Proceedings to Continue ("Dismissal Motion"). The appearances of counsel were noted on the record. After arguments were presented, the matter was taken under submission.
Chris N. Acton v. City of Columbiapublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 04-3985 ___________ Chris N. Acton; Boyd J. Arends; * Chris N. Babich; Tim Bach; Greg * Bacon; Anthony Bannister; Arnold J. * Bazat; Alan Beard; Mark E. Blakemore; * Bruce Britt; Mark Brunstrom; K. P. * Bullard; James E. Bullard; Eric T. * Casza
Azimi v. Ford Motor Co.public domain
977 F.Supp. 847 (1996) Siamak AZIMI, Plaintiff, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a Michigan corporation, Defendant. No. 97 C 0360. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 15, 1996. *848 *849 Adam Jacob Krohn, Krohn & Moss, Ltd., Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff.
Bartlett v. Baasiripublic domain
21-2019 Bartlett v. Baasiri In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2022 No. 21-2019 ROBERT BARTLETT, TERREL CHARLES BARTLETT, LINDA JONES, SHAWN BARTLETT, MAXINE E. CROCKETT, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF RICKY LEON CROCKETT, MARVISE L. CROCKETT, TRACIE ARSIAGA, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT R. ARSIAG
Acton v. City Of Columbia, Missouripublic domain
436 F.3d 969 Chris N. ACTON; Boyd J. Arends; Chris N. Babich; Tim Bach; Greg Bacon; Anthony Bannister; Arnold J. Bazat; Alan Beard; Mark E. Blakemore;Bruce Britt; Mark Brunstrom; K.P. Bullard; James E. Bullard; Eric T. Caszatt; Brian Clifford; Justin M. Collins; Daniel J. Comegys; Darrin W. Arends; Rusty Bradley; Ron Cook; Frank Kirby Crow; Keith E. Dothage; Gary R. Drewing, II; Delwyn Duncan; Kyle Fansler; Kurt Fansler; Ron M. Fisher; Travis F
Dobyns v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION ALLEGRA, Judge: In this case, an agent of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) alleges that, following a highly successful undercover operation, ATF failed to protect him and his family from threats and violence, and otherwise subjected him to a hostile work environment. He asserts that ATF’s malfeasance and misfeasance in these and other regards violated an agreement he h
174 F.3d 1087 160 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2650, 137 Lab.Cas. P 10,390,23 Employee Benefits Cas. 1073, 1999 CJ C.A.R. 1703 Terry A. GARVIN; John McGrail; Ferdnand Adamson; EdithAitken; Marva Akins; Douglas R. Allen; Shirley Allen;Loren Alm; Sheila Altman; Cornelious Anderson; Peggy C.Anderson; Claudette B. Anterin; Esther Arnold; Kenneth G.Arsenault; Jerry M. Ashley; Lindy Ashley; Johnice M.
Maryland v. Craigpublic domain
497 U.S. 836 (1990) MARYLAND v. CRAIG. No. 89-478. Supreme Court of the United States. Argued April 18, 1990. Decided June 27, 1990. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. *838 J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General of Maryland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Gary
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4519217 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/16/20