Cases

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT MANUEL A. COLON-MONTANER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D2023-2239 [August 15, 2024] Appeal from the County Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; August A. Bonavita

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL V ÁNGEL F. COLÓN VEGA, Apelación su esposa ROSALÍA procedente del VELÁZQUEZ OCASIO y la Tribunal de Primera SOCIEDAD LEGAL DE Instancia, Sala GANANCIALES que ambos Superior de componen; PEDRO LUIS

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL1 JUAN ANTONIO MOREIRA Certiorari procedente del Peticionario Tribunal de Primera KLCE202500482 Instancia, Sala de v. Bayamón AMNERIS VELÁZQUEZ

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL WILLIAM LÓPEZ Certiorari COLÓN, ET ALS. y Apelación procedentes del Tribunal Recurrido-Apelado de Primera Instancia, Sala de Bayamón v. KLCE20230115

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL II MARÍA ELENA MUÑOZ Certiorari COLÓN procedente del Tribunal de Primera Peticionaria Instancia, Sala Superior de Caguas v.

19 A.3d 699 (2011) 129 Conn.App. 59 Antonio COLON v. STATE of Connecticut, Judicial Branch. No. 31702. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued December 2, 2010. Decided May 31, 2011. *700 Jeffrey T. Schuyler, for the appellant (plaintiff). Nancy A. Brouillet, assistant attorney gener

GARWOOD, Circuit Judge: Appellant appeals the denial of his motion to vacáte and set aside his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Finding no merit to any of the assigned errors, we affirm. *1330 CONTEXT FACTS Appellant, Luis Antonio Colon-Padilla, was a

SHARP, W., J. Colon appeals his sentence after pleading guilty to two counts of trafficking in phenethylamines (MDMA pills), 10-200 grams, in a single criminal episode.1 He argues three points in this appeal, only one of which has any merit: that his due process rights and right to counsel were violated when the state and public defender failed to inform him that a plea offer had been made. We

Ireland, J. The defendant, Antonio Colon, was indicted for kidnapping a twelve year old girl in violation of G. L. c. 265, § 26. He moved to dismiss the indictment, contending that the Commonwealth failed to present evidence that the kidnapping was “against her will.” A Superior Court judge denied the motion and concluded that a twelve year old has “no authority or capacity, as a matter of law,” to leave the legal custody of he

ALTENBERND, Acting Chief Judge. Luis Antonio Colon appeals his convictions and sentences for one count of second-degree murder and two counts of shooting at, within, or into a building. We affirm Mr. Colon’s convictions without discussion but remand for reconsideration of his sentences. Mr. Colon was sentenced under the 1995 sentencing guidelines to 37.9 years’ incarceration on each of the three

SUMMARY ORDER Felix Colon appeals from a December 17, 2007 judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Kahn, J.). Colon alleges that he was exposed to dangerous levels of environmental tobacco smoke (“ETS”) during his incarceration at FCI Ray Brook (“Ray Brook”), which caused him to suffer serious medical harm. Colon challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment i

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Frank Torres, J.), rendered October 26, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds, criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 4V2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed. The

SUMMARY ORDER Felix Colon appeals from a December 17, 2007 judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Kahn, J.). Colon alleges that he was exposed to dangerous levels of environmental tobacco smoke (“ETS”) during his incarceration at FCI Ray Brook (“Ray Brook”), which caused him to suffer serious medical harm. Colon challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment i

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas July 6, 2015 No. 04-15-00373-CR IN RE Robert Luis COLON Original Mandamus Proceeding1 ORDER Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justi

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-15-00373-CR IN RE Robert Luis COLON Original Mandamus Proceeding 1 PER CURIAM Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice

*4 LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. We revisit in this case whether federal law forbids Puerto Rico from removing individuals from its active voter registry for the office of Resident Commissioner— the only federal elective position in Puerto Rico — based solely on their failure to vote in one general election. In 2012,

794 F.Supp.2d 353 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Erik DIAZ-COLON [11], Defendant. Criminal No. 09-228 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. June 28, 2011. *354 Antonio R. Bazan-Gonzalez, Jose A. Contreras, United States Attorneys Office, District of Puerto Rico, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff. <

OPINION AND ORDER BRUCE J. McGIVERIN, United States Magistrate Judge This case presents thorny statutory construction issues relating to a Puerto Rico statute governing the extent of liability in certain medical malpractice actions. Jessica Oquendo-Lorenzo, Rolando Lopez-Montanez, and them conjugal partnership (collectively, “Oquendo”) allege medical malpractice in this diversity tort action, and seek sev

*556ORDER OF COURT Appellant Myrna Colon-Marrero’s November 2, 2012 emergency motion is denied.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglass, J.), dated May 19, 2004, as denied his motion, denominated as one for leave to renew and reargue, which was, in actuality, for leave to reargue his prior motion, in effect, to vacate an order of the same court dated April 17, 2002, denying his motion to restore the action to the calenda