⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Apple Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated”

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021-04-07 · Published · cited 16× · 992 F.3d 1378
Case: 20-1561 Document: 59 Page: 1 Filed: 04/07/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ APPLE INC., Appellant v. QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, Appellee ______________________ 2020-1561 ______________________ Appeal from the United
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021-11-10 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 20-1683 Document: 87 Page: 1 Filed: 11/10/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ APPLE INC., Appellant v. QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, Appellee ______________________ 2020-1683, 2020-1763, 2020-1764, 2020-1827 ______________________ Appeals from the United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2025-04-23 · Published · cited 2× · 134 F.4th 1355
Case: 23-1208 Document: 55 Page: 1 Filed: 04/23/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, Appellant v. APPLE INC., Appellee COKE MORGAN STEWART, ACTING UNDER SECRETARY AND ACTING DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Inte
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022-02-01 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 20-1558 Document: 82 Page: 1 Filed: 02/01/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, Appellant v. APPLE INC., Appellee ANDREW HIRSHFELD, PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PAT
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022-02-01 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 20-1558 Document: 82 Page: 1 Filed: 02/01/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, Appellant v. APPLE INC., Appellee ANDREW HIRSHFELD, PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PAT
District Court, S.D. California · 2017-09-07 · Published · cited 4× · 283 F. Supp. 3d 905
Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel, United States District Judge Before the Court is a motion for preliminary injunction filed by Plaintiff Qualcomm Incorporated ("Qualcomm") against Defendants Compal Electronics, Inc. ("Compal"), FIH Mobile Ltd. and Hon Hai Precision Industry Co. (together "Foxconn"), Pegatron Corporation ("Pegatron"), and Wistron Corporation ("Wistron"), collectively "Defendants" or "Contract Manufacturers." Dkt. No. 35-1.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-02-25 · Published · cited 11× · 129 F.4th 1129
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SARAH KEY; ANDREW No. 23-3354 WESTLEY; TERESE D.C. No. RUSSELL; CARRA ABERNATHY, 3:17-md-02773- JSC Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. OPINION QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, a Delaware
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014-04-25 · Published · cited 216× · 757 F.3d 1286; 94 Fed. R. Serv. 301; 110 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1695; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 7757; 2014 WL 1646435
RADER, Chief Judge, dissenting-in-part. I join the court’s opinion in its entirety, except for the affirmance of the district court’s denial of Motorola’s request for an injunction. To my eyes, the record contains sufficient evidence to create a genuine dispute of material fact on Apple’s posture as an unwilling licensee whose continued infringement of the '898 patent caused irreparable harm. Because of the un
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021-12-28 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 20-1828 Document: 98 Page: 1 Filed: 12/28/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ INTEL CORPORATION, Appellant v. QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, Cross-Appellant ______________________ 2020-1828, 2020-1867 ______________________ Appeals from the United States P
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021-12-28 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 20-1664 Document: 103 Page: 1 Filed: 12/28/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ INTEL CORPORATION, Appellant v. QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, Appellee ______________________ 2020-1664 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent a
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021-12-28 · Published · cited 36× · 21 F.4th 784
Case: 20-1664 Document: 103 Page: 1 Filed: 12/28/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ INTEL CORPORATION, Appellant v. QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, Appellee ______________________ 2020-1664 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent a
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021-12-28 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 20-1828 Document: 98 Page: 1 Filed: 12/28/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ INTEL CORPORATION, Appellant v. QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, Cross-Appellant ______________________ 2020-1828, 2020-1867 ______________________ Appeals from the United States P
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020-08-11 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, No. 19-16122 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 5:17-cv-00220- LHK QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, A Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellant, OPINION SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY, LTD.; SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR IN
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020-08-11 · Published · cited 79× · 969 F.3d 974
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, No. 19-16122 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 5:17-cv-00220- LHK QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, A Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellant, OPINION SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY, LTD.; SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR IN
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021-09-29 · Published · cited 23× · 14 F.4th 1059
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KAREN STROMBERG; SAMUEL No. 19-15159 ROECKER; THOMAS LAMMEL; MARY GALLOWAY; DANIELLE LAGRAVE; D.C. No. THOMAS MCMAHON; BOARDSPORTS 5:17-md-02773- SCHOOL LLC; PATRICK BENAD; LHK LINDSEY CARR; RENEE ACOSTA; PATRICIA BURNESS; CAROL HARRIS; ROBERT LINKS; NICHELLE LYONS; OPINION NUALA VIGNOLES; RACHEL L. MILLER; JOHN WILLIAM KIEFER III; MATTHEW MITCHELL; SUSAN
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023-09-11 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 22-1350 Document: 42 Page: 1 Filed: 09/11/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ APPLE INC., Appellant v. COREPHOTONICS, LTD., Appellee ______________________ 2022-1350, 2022-1351 ______________________ Appeals from the United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023-11-03 · Published · cited 41× · 85 F.4th 948
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CORONAVIRUS REPORTER; No. 22-15166 CALID, INC.; PRIMARY PRODUCTIONS LLC, D.C. No. 3:21-cv- 05567-EMC Plaintiffs-Appellants, and OPINION JEFFREY D. ISAACS, Dr., Plaintiff, v. APPLE, INC., Defendant-Appellee, and FEDERAL TRADE
In re Qualcomm Inc.public domain
District Court, N.D. California · 2016-02-18 · Published · cited 16× · 162 F. Supp. 3d 1029
ORDER DENYING APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE TO OBTAIN DISCOVERY FOR USE IN FOREIGN PROCEEDINGS (Re: Docket No. 1) PAUL S. GREWAL, United States Magistrate Judge A few months back, Applicant Qual-comm Incorporated received an Examiner’s Report from the Korean Fair Trade Commission. The news was not good: the Examiner charged Qualcomm and its licensing of standard-essential patents with vio
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023-09-11 · Published · cited 2× · 81 F.4th 1353
Case: 22-1350 Document: 42 Page: 1 Filed: 09/11/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ APPLE INC., Appellant v. COREPHOTONICS, LTD., Appellee ______________________ 2022-1350, 2022-1351 ______________________ Appeals from the United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023-04-24 · Published · cited 58× · 67 F.4th 946
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EPIC GAMES, INC., No. 21-16506 Plaintiff-counter- defendant-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:20-cv-05640- v. YGR APPLE, INC., Defendant-counter- OPINION claimant- Appellee. EPIC GAMES, INC., No. 21-16695