Cases

ORDER ON ATTORNEYS FEES ALLEGRA, Judge. Blind Plaintiff, lame Defendant, share the Friendly Laws impartial care, A Shell for him, A shell for thee, The Middle is the Lawyer’s Fee.1 Before the court are the remnants of a hotly-contested taking action stemming from the erosion of Cocoa Beach and other beach holdings south of Cape Canaveral, Florida, all

552 F.3d 1182 (2008) Dennis R. COWAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration,[*] Defendant-Appellee. No. 07-6236. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. December 24, 2008. *1183 Submitted on the briefs:[**] Jennifer Struble, Robert E. Applegate, Perrin

635 F.3d 784 (2011) McClenon MURKELDOVE, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee. Gralin Vinning, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee. Joann Brown, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee. Mary Ann Kennan-Croom, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mich

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2022-3942 _____________________________ MICHAEL GUGLIELMO, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA-DOC ZEPHYRHILLS C I/ DIVISION OF RISK MANAGEMENT, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Office of the Judges of Compensation Claims. Robert A. Arthur, Judge. Date of Accident: July

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. BERNARD A. BRANDON (SC 20371) Robinson, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Ecker, Keller and Bright, Js.* Syllabus Convicted of manslaughter in the first degree with a firearm in connection with the shooting death of the victim, the defendant appealed to this court. The defendant, who had been serving probation for a prior convic- tion, was at a

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0215p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ J. B-K., minor child 1, by Next Friend E.B., et al., │

23-1162-cv; 23-1344-cv Nat’l Ass’n for Gun Rights v. Lamont; Grant v. Rovella In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit ________ AUGUST TERM 2024 ARGUED: OCTOBER 16, 2024 DECIDED: AUGUST 22, 2025 Nos. 23-1162, 23-1344 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR GUN RIGHTS, TO

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 15, 2011 Nos. 09-10902, 09-11093 Lyle W. Cayce

[Cite as Schneider v. Kumpf, 2016-Ohio-5161.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY BARBARA SCHNEIDER : : Plaintiff-Appellant : Appellate Case No. 26955 : v.

893 A.2d 70 (2006) M. Diane KOKEN, Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, v. RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, Vitas Healthcare Corporation, Vitas Holding Corp., Vitas Healthcare of Texas, L.P., Magellan Reinsurance Company, Ltd., RBH Reinsurance Ltd., Cleanese Americas Corp., Elmwood Insurance Ltd., Clewood Insurance Company, Citicorp Insurance USA, Citicorp, Clients Assurance Pool, Ltd., and CSX Insurance Co., Intervenors App

981 A.2d 427 (2009) 294 Conn. 1 STATE of Connecticut v. FERNANDO A.[*] Nos. 18045, 18103. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued March 12, 2008. Decided November 3, 2009. *429 Steven D. Ecker, Hartford, with whom was Alinor C. Sterling, Branford, for the appellant (defendant).

RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO AMEND EXHIBITS VICTOR A. BOLDEN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Defendants’ Motion to Correct the Exhibits.. . .292 II. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. . .294 A. Background Facts... .294 B. Standard...296

71 P.3d 717 (2003) 2003 WY 77 Dean GREENWALT; Lizabeth Greenwalt; Rachel Greenwalt, a minor, by Dean Greenwalt, her conservator; and Dean Greenwalt, as personal representative for the Estate of John Douglas Greenwalt, Deceased, Appellants (Plaintiffs), v. RAM RESTAURANT CORPORATION OF WYOMING, a Wyoming corporation, d/b/a C.B. & Potts & Big Horn Brewing Company; Cheyenne 28, LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Comp

HOLLANDER, J. Nicholas Sharp, appellant, and Barry and Rhonda Downey, appellees, own adjacent tracts of land in Howard County. For almost eight years, the parties, as well as their predecessors in title and some of their neighbors, have been engaged in litigation as to various matters regarding the adjoining parcels. In 2007 and 2008, the Circuit Court for Howard County ordered the parties to submit their disputes to binding

526 F.Supp.2d 1143 (2007) Sarah C. WHITE, Individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of Stefan Bournakel, Deceased, and as Next Friend of Nicos Robert Bournakel, a minor, Plaintiffs, v. Carol Ann SABATINO, Bob's Maui Dive Shop, Inc. dba Maui Dive Shop, a Hawaii Corporation; 3090 Incorporated, a Hawaii Corporation; Ronald E. Wallach; County of Maui; Franklyn L. Silva, Individually and in his capacity as Director of the Department of L

OPINION HORN, J. Plaintiffs, a group of landowners in the Westlands Water District (the Westlands) within the San Luis Unit of the Central Valley Project, have filed claims in the United States Court of Federal Claims, under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, alleging that the government’s failure to comply with its statutory obligation to provide drainage to plaintiffs’ farmlands has

625 P.2d 209 (1981) John T. LANGDON, Insurance Commissioner of the State of Wyoming and the Insurance Department of the State of Wyoming, Appellants (Respondents), v. LUTHERAN BROTHERHOOD, a Minnesota Corporation, Appellee (Petitioner). No. 5324. Supreme Court of Wyoming. March 20, 1981. *210 John D. Troughton, Atty. Gen., Gerald

OPINION AND ORDER BUSH, Judge. This takings case is currently before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC), defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to RCFC 56, and plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment, pursuant to RCFC 56. For the reasons set forth herein, plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary

*517Dore, J. (dissenting) — The majority held (1) that the 1-year staff privileges of a physician and surgeon can be summarily stripped without notice or hearing 4 months short of the 1-year appointment period, and that such firing does not violate his constitutional liberty and/or property rights and (2) that due process was complied with on Ritter's appeal even though two

191 P.3d 1062 (2008) Roger Scott MOYLE, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, v. Y & Y HYUP SHIN, CORP., and TTJJKK Inc., both d/b/a Do Re Mi Karaoke, Defendants-Appellees-Respondents. No. 26582. Supreme Court of Hawai`i. September 4, 2008. As Amended September 11, 2008. *1065 Gary Victor Dubin, Honolulu (Long H. V