Cases

AMENDED OPINION IRENAS, District Judge. Plaintiff Michaelson brings claims as Trustee of the Appleseed Litigation Trust formed pursuant to a Chapter 11 reorganization. The claims revolve around a complicated financial transaction, which allegedly caused Appleseed Intermediate Holdings LLC and affiliated debtors (collectively “Debtors”)1 to become insolvent. Presently before the

OPINION BY: KEVIN J. CAREY, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE BACKGROUND On June 3, 2011 (the “Petition Date”), Debtors DSI Renal Holdings LLC (“DSI Renal Holdings”), DSI Hospitals, Inc. (“DSI Hospitals”), and DSI Facility Development, LLC (“DSI Facility”), filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 7 of the United States Bankruptcy Code1 in the United

GREGORY M. SLEET, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION Presently before the court are the appeals of Komodo Cloud, LLC ("Appellant") from two decisions of the Bankruptcy Court, entered in the above-captioned debtors' ("Debtors") chapter 11 cases. The first decision on appeal (B.D.I. 587)1 ("Withdrawal Order") granted Debtors' motion to voluntarily withdraw (B.D.

OPINION & ORDER HERNANDEZ, District Judge: Plaintiff Jesus Villanueva brings this putative class action alleging a violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692p (FDCPA), against certain Defendants. He also brings a fraudulent transfer claim against all Defendants. Two Defendants, Javlin One, LLC and Javlin Capital, LLC, move to

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE NCP US TERMINALS LP, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2024-1338-KSJM ) ODFJELL TERMINALS US ) HOLDINGS, LLC, ODFJELL ) TERMINALS B.V., ODFJELL ) TERMINALS US HOLDINGS

ORDER AND JUDGMENT WENDY L. HAGENAU, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter came before the Court for trial on August 20-22, 2013 on the Trustee’s Complaint for Avoidance of Fraudulent Conveyances under 11 U.S.C. § 544. The Court has jurisdiction of this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334 and 157, and this is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(0). The parties stipulated in their Joint

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DAVID L. BUNNING, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This bankruptcy adversary proceeding comes before the Court on several Defendants’ and Plaintiffs motions to withdraw the reference to the United States Bank*734ruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky. On June 11, 2009, several cr

OPINION RICHARD E. FEHLING, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. INTRODUCTION These adversary complaints constitute, an attempt by the Chapter 7 Trustee in the underlying main bankruptcy case (the “Trustee”), to recover funds from Pennsylvania State University (“Penn State”) pursuant to a relatively new legal theory. The United States Department of Education (the “Department”) paid the pr

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DAVID BRAMLETTE, District Judge. This cause is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [docket entry no. 90], Defendants’ Motion to Exclude [docket entry no. 93], Plaintiffs Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony of Expert Witness John Czarnetzky [docket entry no. 94], Plaintiffs Motion in Limine to Exclude Certain “Opinions” of Defense Expert J.W.

MEMORANDUM DECISION William R. Sawyer, United States Bankruptcy Judge This Adversary Proceeding was called for trial on November 4, 2013. Plaintiff Daniel G. Hamm1 was present in person and by counsel Steve Olen and Lucy Tufts. Neither the Defendants nor their counsel, Thomas McAlpine, appeared. For the reasons set forth below, the Court enters judgment by default i

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 07/10/2024 06:08 PM CDT - 746 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 316 Nebraska Reports MIMG LXXIV COLONIAL V. ELLIS Cite as 316 Neb. 746 MIMG LXXIV Colonial, LLC, appellant,

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS Nos. 18-CV-1349 and 19-CV-1225 NANCY B. PARKER and ELLIS J. PARKER, APPELLANTS/CROSS-APPELLEES, v. U.S. TRUS

MEMORANDUM HON. LEONARD P. STARK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SNMP Research International, Inc. and SNMP Research, Inc. (together, “SNMP”) move this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(d) to withdraw the reference (D.I.1) (the “Motion”) of their adversary complaint (Adv.Pro. No. 11-53454, D.I.1) against Nortel Networks, Inc. and Avaya, Inc. For the reasons stated below, the Court will deny SNMP’s moti

OPINION AND ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge. Plaintiff Bettina M. Whyte, acting in her capacity as the trustee of the SemGroup Litigation Trust (the “Trustee”), brings the above-captioned case seeking to avoid certain transactions between several Sem-Group entities1 and defendants Barclays Bank PLC and Barclays Capital, Inc. (collectively, “Barclays”). On August

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNTS 2, 3, AND 4 ROBERT J. FARIS, Bankruptcy Judge. In this adversary proceeding, the chapter 7 trustee of a company that operated a Ponzi scheme seeks to recover money transferred to the defendants. The plaintiff filed a motion for partial summary judgment on December 9, 2011. Numerous defendants opposed the motion.

ORDER SAM SPARKS, District Judge. BE IT REMEMBERED on the 19th of September, 2013, the Court called a hearing in the above-styled cause, and the parties appeared by and through counsel. Pending before the Court are the following summary judgment motions: Duke Energy Corporation, Duke Ventures, LLC, and Spectra Energy Capital, LLC (collectively, Duke)’s Motion for Summary Judgment [# 157], Plain

MEMORANDUM ORDER CHRISTOPHER J. BURKE, United States Magistrate Judge. Pending before the Court in this contract dispute is the issue of whether and to what extent to seal the transcript from oral argument proceedings that were held on April 24, 2012. For the reasons discussed below, the Court ORDERS that only those portions of the transcript that quote or discuss confidential financial terms o

The opinion of the court was delivered by MESSANO, J.A.D. Plaintiffs are legal resident aliens who have resided in this country for less than five years. They seek emergent relief enjoining enforcement of Medicaid Communication 10-01 and N.J.A.C. 10:78-3.2, as amended and adopted on May 28, 2010, which authorized termination of their enrollment in the NJ FamilyCare Program (FamilyCare), a state-fund

Affirmed in Part, Reversed in Part, and Remanded and Opinion filed March 6, 2026. In The Fifteenth Court of Appeals NO. 15-24-00010-CV TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CHRISTINA MITCHELL, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS 38TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY, Appellants V. TEXAS TRIBUNE; ABC NEWS; CBS NEWS; CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC.; DOW JONES

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS Nos. 124,378 125,084 LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF KANSAS, LOUD LIGHT, KANSAS APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE, INC., and TOPEKA INDEPENDENT LIVING RESOURCE CENTER, Appellants, v. SCOTT SCHWAB, in His Official Capacity a