Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Applied Research Investments, LLC v. Lin”
Lin v. TipRanks, Ltd.public domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 20-1001 CHING-YI LIN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. TIPRANKS, LTD., Defendant, Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Allison D. Burroughs, U.S. District Judge]
Clearmeadow Investments, LLC v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION ALLEGRA, Judge: “When pondering sexy legal issues,” one commentator recently noted, “it is doubtful that tax law crosses the minds of many.”1 Yet, once in a while (alright, a long while), a tax dispute bursts into the mainstream. Take, for example, the legal controversy swirling around the so-called “Son of BOSS” transactions — the quoted phrase being short fo
John T. Preston and C Change Investments, LLC v. Emjo Investments, Ltd. and H.J. Von Der Goltzpublic domain
ACCEPTED 01-15-00390-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/12/2015 9:25:40 PM
Stobie Creek Investments, LLC v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER MILLER, Judge. In May 2000 members of the Welles family sold half of their stock in the family business, Therma-Tru Corporation (“Therma-Tru”) of Toledo, Ohio. That portion of the Therma-Tru stock was held by Stobie Creek Investments, LLC (“Stobie Creek”), a partnership controlled by members of the Welles family. These cases, before the court after trial, are complaints for re
In Re OCEANOGRAFIA, S.A. De C v. Otto Candies, LLC, Candies Mexican Investments, and OSA Internationalpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION Memorandum Opinion by Justice PERKES. 1 ’ ’ On June 11, 2014, relators Oceanografía, S.A. de C.V. (“Oceanografía”), Otto Candies, LLC (“Otto Candies”), Candies Mexican Investments (“Candies Mexican”), and OSA International, filed a petition for writ of ma
Seven Networks, LLC v. Google LLCpublic domain
RODNEY GILSTRAP, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Google LLC's ("Google") Second Renewed Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Transfer under 28 U.S.C. § 1406 for Improper Venue. (Dkt. No. 125) ("the Motion"). Having considered the Motion, the Court is of the opinion that it should be D
OPINION AND ORDER Mark S. Davis, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE CertusView Technologies, LLC (“Cer-tusView” or “Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant”) filed this patent infringement action alleging that S&N Locating Services, LLC and S&N Communications, Inc.’s (“S&N” or “Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs”) infringed the five Patents-in-Suit. S&N responded by filing an amended answer asserting an inequita
LAURIE SELBER SILVERSTEIN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Complaint on Jurisdictional Grounds2 through which Defendants seek *639to dismiss or stay this adversary proceeding on multiple grounds, some at least nominally jurisdictional, most not. Plaintiffs and Defend
VIDIVIXI, LLC v. Grattanpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge This is a case about an unfortunate falling out between former friends and business partners in a firm that designs high-end furniture. The firm is incongruously known as ‘VIDIVIXI,” an apparent play on the well-known phrase: “Veni, vidi, vici,” — “I came, I saw, I conquered.” Julius Caesar allegedly used the Latin boast to describe a speedy and
Ixchel Pharma, LLC v. Biogen, Inc.public domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA IXCHEL PHARMA, LLC, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BIOGEN, INC., Defendant and Respondent. S256927 Ninth Circuit 18-15258 Eastern District of California 2:17-cv-00715-WBS-EFB August 3, 2020 Just
Semco, LLC v. Grand Ltd.public domain
WICKER, J. Lin this appeal, Semco, L.L.C. and The Grand Ltd. seek review of the trial judgment, rendered following a nearly three-week jury trial, awarding $4,831,144.00 in favor of Semco and $680,845.00 in favor of The Grand for damages arising out of the construction of a multi-million dollar lift-boat. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court judgment but amend the judgment to award judicial interest from th
Ixchel Pharma, LLC v. Biogen, Inc.public domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT IXCHEL PHARMA, LLC, No. 18-15258 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:17-cv-00715-WBS-EFB BIOGEN, INC., ORDER CERTIFYING Defendant-Appellee. QUESTIONS TO THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT Appeal from the United States
NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-13381 ROBINHOOD FINANCIAL LLC vs. SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH &
In re Relativity Fashion, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING MOTION FOR AWARDS OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES AGAINST NETFLIX, INC. MICHAEL E. WILES, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE ' Relativity (defined below) and Mr. Ryan Kavanaugh have filed a motion seeking reimbursement of attorneys’ fees and expenses they incurred during litigation against Netflix, Inc. [Docket No. 1963]. The litigation resulted in an Order and Injunction [Docket No. 19
HipCricket, Inc. v. mGage, LLCpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE HIPCRICKET, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 11135-CB ) mGAGE, LLC and GLENN ) STANSBURY, ) ) Defendants.
Cerro Fabricated Prods. LLC v. Solanickpublic domain
Robert D. Mariani, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Presently before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 6). On December 29, 2017, Plaintiff, Cerro Fabricated Products, LLC, (hereinafter "Cerro") filed a Complaint against its former employee, Defendant George Solanick, asserting Misapprop
Minnie Rose LLC v. Yupublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER Ramos, District Judge. Minnie Rose LLC (“Plaintiff’ or “Minnie Rose”), a New York clothing retailer and fashion brand, brings suit against Anna Yu (“Yu”), her closely held corporation Elva Green Clothing Company Ltd. (“Elva Green”), and John Does 1-10 for fraudulent misrepresentation and unjust enrichment. Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). B
Bouveng v. NYG Capital LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER PAUL G. GARDEPHE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE. Plaintiff Hanna Bouveng brings this action against Defendants NYG Capital LLC, d/b/a New York Global Group (“NYGG”), FNL Media LLC (“FNL Media”), and Benjamin Wey alleging claims of (1) quid pro quo sexual harassment under the New York State Human Rights Law (the “NYSHRL”) and New York City Human Rights Law (the “NYCHRL”) again
Gordon v. Sonar Capital Management LLCpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge. Plaintiff Sidney Gordon1'brings this suit against defendants Sonar Capital Management (“Sonar”), the hedge funds for which Sonar served as investment adviser (Sonar Partners, LP, Sonar Institutional Fund, LP, and Sonar Overseas Fund, Ltd. (collectively, the “Sonar Funds”)), and former Sonar President and CEO Neil Druker.
Dillon Trust Company LLC v. United Statespublic domain
Case: 24-1314 Document: 48 Page: 1 Filed: 05/14/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ DILLON TRUST COMPANY LLC, AS TRUSTEE FOR TRUSTS 709204, 709210, AND 8545, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2024-1314 _______________