Cases

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROANNE L. MANN, United States Magistrate Judge: Plaintiff Gerardo Valdez Lujan (“Lujan”) and several “opt-in” plaintiffs (collectively, “plaintiffs”) bring this lawsuit against defendants Cabana Management, Inc. (“Cabana”) and Glenn Frechter (collectively, “defendants”) to recover minimum wage and overtime payments allegedly due to Lujan and other current and former employe

(2008) TRANSAMERICA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Western Reserve Life Assurance Co. of Ohio, Transamerica Financial Life Insurance Company, Plaintiffs, v. LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. C 06-110-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Cedar Rapids Division. December 5, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING TRANSAMERICA'S MOT

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-08-144-CV ASTORIA INDUSTRIES OF IOWA, INC. APPELLANT V. BRAND FX BODY COMPANY APPELLEE ------------ FROM THE 17TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNT

<

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-08-144-CV ASTORIA INDUSTRIES OF IOWA, INC. APPELLANT V.

DECISION Before the Court is plaintiffs', Ann and Arthur Zarrella ("plaintiffs"), motion for class certification. Jurisdiction is pursuant to Rule 23 of the Rhode Island Superior Court Rules of Civil Procedure. Facts/Travel Plaintiff, Ann Zarrella ("Mrs. Zarrella"), was an owner of two Adjustable Life III Policies ("AL III"), numbers 16699310 and 18706

69 P.3d 986 (2003) Colleen COUGHLIN, Appellant, v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY (GEICO), Appellee. No. S-10072. Supreme Court of Alaska. April 18, 2003. Rehearing Denied June 9, 2003. *987 Allen Vacura, Stepovich Law Office, Fairbanks, for Appellant. Susan D. Mack and Mark E. Wilkerson, Wilkerson

OAKES, Senior Circuit Judge. This appeal raises the difficult question of under what circumstances the law of trade dress appropriately protects industrial design. Those who would seek monopolistic protection for industrial design, but are unable to obtain a design patent, have had little success under the law of copyright even with the “conceptual separateness” gloss provided by

365 S.C. 402 (2005) 618 S.E.2d 909 Gene W. CROFT, Jr., as Personal Representative of the Estate of Gene W. Croft, Sr., Plaintiff, v. OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. 26032. Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard April 20, 2005. Decided August 22, 2005. *406 Richard A. Harpoot

Honorable Mike K. Nakagawa, United States Bankruptcy Judge On October 30, 2018, a trial was conducted in the above-captioned adversary proceeding. The appearances of counsel were noted on the record. After consideration of the evidence and arguments presented at trial, the court enters this Memorandum Decision, which constitutes the court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to FRBP 7052 and FRCP 52.<

OPINION & ORDER MELINDA HARMON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending in the above-referenced cause is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint. (Doc. 7.) Having reviewed the motion, Plaintiffs Response in Opposition (Doc. 11), and the relevant law, the Court is of the opinion that Defendant’s motion should be DENIED. I. Background The dispute in this c

Filed 3/28/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A164679 v. MAURICE A. JACKSON, (Contra Costa County Super. Ct. No. 59007014) Defendant and Appel

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Paul W. Bonapfel, U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge The Chapter 7 Debtor, Michael Eugene Cloninger, served as the personal representative for the estate of his deceased mother, Betty Joyce Cloninger, in Bro-ward County, Florida. His brother, the Plaintiff William Edward Cloninger, timely commenced this adversary proceeding for a determination that a debt he asserts agains

Filed 4/17/25 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, A164679 Plaintiff and Respondent, v. (Contra Costa County

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 21-CV-0798 UNIT OWNERS ASSOCIATION OF 2337 CHAMPLAIN STREET CONDOMINIUM, DONALD P. MULLIKIN, PEDRO COLI, SHARON CAO, LUIS E. LUY, and VIANKA LUY,

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 11, 2020 Christopher M. Wolpert

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-2658 ___________________________ Lawn Managers, Inc., a Missouri Corporation Plaintiff Appellee v. Progressive Lawn Managers, Inc., a Missouri Corporation

USCA11 Case: 21-13458 Date Filed: 11/29/2022 Page: 1 of 41 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-13458 ____________________ MGFB PROPERTIES, INC., FLORA-BAMA MANAGEMENT LLC, FLORA-BAMA OLD S.A.L.T.S. INC, Plaintiffs-Appella

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 26a0192p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ PATRICE NELSON, as personal representative of the │ Estate of Jaquel

Filed 3/9/21; certified for publication 4/6/21 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO KELLEY PEVIANI et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, E073950 v. (Super.Ct.No. RIC1704192) ARBORS AT CALIFORNIA OAKS