Cases

State Farm Fire Casualty Company ("State Farm"), as subrogee of its insured, JC Propeller Service ("JC Propeller"), and JC Propeller appeal from the dismissal of their action against Aretha Smith. We reverse and remand. On December 29, 2008, State Farm and JC Propeller sued Smith, alleging that Smith had negligently caused an automobile to collide with a building owned by JC Propeller. On February 6, 2009, Smith filed a motion to dismiss, asserting insufficient service of proce

NESBITT, District Judge: Aretha Baker appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for a preliminary injunction on the grounds that the court should have held an evidentiary hearing. Although Fed.R.Civ.P. 65(a) does not require a hearing on every motion for injunc-tive relief, we hold that on the facts of this case the court erred in not conducting a hearing.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ August 31, 2020 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A20A1038. ROBERSON v. POWELL. Aretha Roberson, purportedly as assignee of a lease-purchase agreement,1 appeals the trial court’s order granting a writ of possession in favor of property owner Joyce Powell. “It is well settled that only a party to the case can

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2024-CA-00977-COA COAHOMA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI SCHOOL APPELLANT DISTRICT v. ARETHA WILLIAMS APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/18/2024 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. WATOSA MARSHALL SANDERS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: COAHOMA COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTORNEYS

Aretha M. Jones appeals from a summary judgment entered by the Madison Circuit Court in favor of Bettye Shannon. We reverse and remand. Facts and Procedural History Shannon and Henry M. Jones ("Henry") were married in 1961. In 1977, Shannon and Henry acquired certain real property ("the property") as joint tenants with the right of survivorship. In July 1988, Shannon and Henry divorced. The parties entered into a separation agreement that was incorpor

219 Ga. 739 (1964) 135 S.E.2d 866 SMITH et al. v. SMITH. 22362. Supreme Court of Georgia. Argued February 10, 1964. Decided March 5, 1964. Duffy, Hendrix & Miller, for plaintiffs in error. Aretha M. Smith, Joseph H. Briley, contra. QUILLIAN, Justice. The instant case is here for review f

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 92-KA-00427-SCT ARETHA L. SIMMONS v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 4/10/92 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. BILLY JOE LANDRUM COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: JONES COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: DAVID M. RATCLIFF ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GEN

OPINION SWEET, District Judge. Plaintiff Kelly Schomburg (“Plaintiff” or “Schomburg”) has moved pursuant to Rule 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to compel non-party New York County District Attorney’s Office (“DANY”) to produce the closed investigation file concerning Defendant Deputy Inspector Anthony Bologna’s (“Bologna”) conduct on September 24, 2011.1

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS PER CURIAM.* These consolidated attorney disciplinary proceedings arise from the filing of two sets of formal charges by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Joe L. Smith, an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Louisiana. The charges allege respondent violated Rules 1.3 (lack of due diligence), 1.4 (fail

70 So.3d 1047 (2011) Jacqueline YOUNG, individually and on behalf of her minor children, Don'tiquae Young and Jai'Queshia Young, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Aretha Ann McGRAW, Vernon Washington, and USAgencies Casualty Insurance Company, Inc., Defendant-Appellant. No. 46,389-CA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. July 20, 2011. *10

Branch, Judge. The father of a girl, now six years old, brings this appeal from a trial court’s order on a petition by the child’s mother. The trial court suspended the father’s visitation rights and found him in contempt for failing to pay child support. 1 The father argues that the trial court erred when it suspended

MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLIAM M. ACKER, JR., District Judge. Before the court is a motion for summary judgment filed by defendant National Vision, Inc. (“NVI”). (Doc. 39). The motion seeks dismissal of the above-entitled action brought by plaintiff Aretha M. Edwards (“Edwards”). Edwards, a black female, sued NVI, her former employer, for race discrimination and harassment in violation of 42 U.S.C

Melton, Justice. Following a February 1998 jury trial, Gabriel Lee Evans was found guilty of kidnapping with bodily injury, kidnapping, aggravated assault, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in connection with the beating of Aretha Perkins. Evans’ convictions were upheld on appeal (Evans v. State, 240 Ga. App. 215 (522 SE2d 506) (1999)), and, after filing an unsuccessful habeas petition to challenge hi

*830OPINION OF THE COURT Plummer E. Lott, J. The defendant, pro se, moves to vacate the judgment on the ground that her attorney was suspended from the practice of law during his representation of the defendant in this case. In deciding this motion the court has considered the motion papers, the affirmation in opposition and the cou

Cite as 2015 Ark. 253 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-14-1033 GGNSC ARKADELPHIA, LLC D/B/A Opinion Delivered June 4, 2015 GOLDEN LIVING CENTER- ARKADELPHIA; GGNSC CAMDEN, APPEAL FROM THE OUACHITA LLC D/B/A GOLDEN LIVING COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT CENTER-CAMDEN; GGNSC [NO. CV-2011-121-6] CROSSETT, LLC D/B/A GOLDEN LIVING CENTER-CROSSETT; GGNSC EL DORADO III, LLC D/B/A GOLDEN LIVING CENTER-EL

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lott, J.), rendered September 10, 2003, convicting her of crimi*949nal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish her guilt

Opinion filed January 4, 2024 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-22-00261-CR __________ JAMES EDWARD HARRELL, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 104th District Court Taylor

314 Ga. 477 FINAL COPY S22A0796. ADKINS v. THE STATE. BETHEL, Justice. After a jury trial, Marion Adkins, Jr., was convicted of malice murder and other crimes in connection with the shooting death of Latisha Gresham. He appeals, contending that the circumstantial evidence presented at trial failed to exclude all other reasonable hypotheses, such as the commission of the crime by some unknown assailant or Gresham’s possible suicide, and was therefore insuff

220 Ga. 401 (1964) 139 S.E.2d 322 MALLETTE v. MALLETTE. 22691. Supreme Court of Georgia. Argued October 13, 1964. Decided November 5, 1964. *402 Aretha M. Smith, Eva L. Sloan, for plaintiff in error. B. B. Hayes, contra. MOBLEY, Justice. 1. During the hea

(2008) Brantley OSTWALT, Guardian ad Litem for unnamed Minor Child, Plaintiff, v. CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG BOARD OF EDUCATION, Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools Law Enforcement Department, Gemini Insurance Company, Ronald Dixon, Alicisa Johnson, Ted Pearson, and Gus Welborn, Defendants. Nos. 3:07-cv-534-RJC, 3:08-cv-266-RJC. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division.