⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

10 opinions for “Argonaut Insurance Company v. Johnson Diversified, Inc.”

Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008-11-12 · Published · cited 0×
THIRD DIVISION November 12, 2008 1-08-0085 & 1-08-0995 Cons. CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff-Appellant, ) Appeal from the ) Circ
Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007-12-26 · Published · cited 12× · 183 P.3d 734; 117 Haw. 357; 2007 Haw. LEXIS 380
Concurring Opinion by ACOBA, J., with whom DUFFY, J., Joins. I concur with the result in this case, but note my qualification to the majority’s holding that the Circuit Court of the First Circuit (the court) “erred when it concluded that an assignment by operation of law is consistent with Hawaii’s rules governing construction of insurance policies.” Majority opinion at 368, 183 P.3d at 745
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992-09-28 · Published · cited 117× · 976 F.2d 58; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 24044; 1992 WL 237953
LEVIN H. CAMPBELL, Senior Circuit Judge. Appellant, Schott Motorcycle Supply, Inc. (“Schott Motorcycle”), a failed Honda motorcycle dealership, sued American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (“Honda”) in the district *60 court. Schott Motorcycle complained that Honda had reduced its commitment to the motorcycle
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008-11-12 · Published · cited 35× · 898 N.E.2d 216; 387 Ill. App. 3d 85
898 N.E.2d 216 (2008) CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN HARDWARE MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION, Timothy Farrell, William Farrell, Reed Elsevier, Inc., Freeman Decorating Company, and Freeman Decorating Services, Inc., Defendants (Federal Insurance Company, Defendant-Counterclaimant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee). Nos. 1-08-0085, 1-08-0995. Appellate Court of Illinois,
In Re ACandS, Inc.public domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2004-01-26 · Published · cited 10× · 311 B.R. 36; 2004 Bankr. LEXIS 81; 2004 WL 1354283
311 B.R. 36 (2004) In re ACANDS, INC., Debtor. No. 02-12687(RJN). United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. January 26, 2004. *37 William Wright Banks, Jr., Georgia Attorney General's Office, Atlanta, GA, Joseph M. Barry, Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLP, Wilmington, DE, Lindsey W. Cooper, Jr, U.S Dept of Justice, Tax Divisio
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1994-05-25 · Published · cited 12× · 886 F. Supp. 1194; 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10488
886 F.Supp. 1194 (1994) CHEMETRON INVESTMENTS, INC., Plaintiff, v. FIDELITY & CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants. ALLEGHENY INTERNATIONAL CANADA, LTD., Plaintiff, v. FIDELITY & CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. Nos. 90-1064, 92-1274. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. May 25, 1994.
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2006-04-27 · Published · cited 138× · 192 S.W.3d 849; 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 3308; 2006 WL 1096191
OPINION By the end of the last day1 to serve timely expert reports on defendants, Sam G. Thoyakulathu, M.D., and Sam T. George, P.A. (Appellants), health care liability claimant, Francis J. Brennan, had obtained and filed reports, but had notserved them on Appellants. Evidence suggests that, on that day, Brennan tried but failed to serve the reports by facsimile transmission. Appellants moved to dism
Court of Appeals of Utah · 2012-08-23 · Published · cited 1× · 2012 UT App 242; 285 P.3d 1230; 715 Utah Adv. Rep. 53; 2012 Utah App. LEXIS 248; 2012 WL 3600368
OPINION McHUGH, Presiding Judge: T1 Randal Roy Mallory appeals from the trial court's order dismissing his First Amended Complaint (the Complaint) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction due to Mallory's failure to file a notice of claim under the Governmental Immunity Act of Utah (the GIAU). 1
District Court, E.D. New York · 2000-08-31 · Published · cited 61× · 114 F. Supp. 2d 117; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13461; 2000 WL 1411100
114 F.Supp.2d 117 (2000) Fernande BODNER, et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. BANQUE PARIBAS, et al., Defendants. Anne Marie Benisti, et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Banque Paribas, et al., Defendants. Nos. 97 CV 7433(SJ), 98 CV 7851(SJ). United States District Court, E.D. New York.
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2015-12-10 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 05-15-01002-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 12/10/2015 12:29:40 PM