Cases

ACCEPTED 03-13-00790-CV 4062436 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

Crothers, Justice. [¶ 1] Statoil Oil & Gas LP appeals from judgments dismissing without prejudice its actions against numerous defendants, seeking a determination of the proper distribution of oil and gas revenues from Williams and McKenzie County wells on land adjacent to the Missouri River and under Lake Sakakawea. We affirm, concluding the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the actions because Stato

Filed 6/16/17 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2017 ND 148 Statoil Oil & Gas LP, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Abaco Energy, LLC; American H

111 F.3d 137 Pens. Plan Guide (CCH) P 23935A NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Evelyn ADAMS; Ronald Bechler; Jack Burns; Chloe Brasuell;Tro

SACKETT, Judge. In this paternity action respondent-appellant challenges (1) an order for blood testing, (2) a finding of paternity, and (3) an order for support. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. A petition was filed in Webster County in which Carol Ann Wegman and the State sought to establish that Respondent Terry Schulz is the father of Car

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 11, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court VICKIE SCHMIDT PARSON; PATRICIA SCALES;

The opinion of the Court was delivered by *197STEIN, J. The issue in this appeal, one of first impression, concerns the power of a court, following a hung jury in a capital murder trial that will result in defendant’s imminent retrial for capital murder, to prohibit representatives of the press from attempting to conduct interviews of the jurors afte

FARRELL, Associate Judge: Petitioner, the Citizens Committee for the District of Columbia Video Lottery Terminal Initiative (the Citizens Committee), challenges a decision of the District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics (the Board) rejecting proposed Initiative Measure No. 68, entitled “The District of Columbia Video Lottery Terminal Initiative of 2004,” on the ground that irregularities in the petition circulation

ORDER G. MURRAY SNOW, District Judge. Pending before the Court are Defendants’ Joint Motion for Summary Judgment Dismissing the Claims of Non-Party Bondholders (Doc. 644) and the Underwriters’ Motion to Exclude the Report and Testimony of Robert M. Smith (Doc. 774). For the reasons discussed below, the Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part, and the Motion to Exclude is denied with

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 14-1900 et al In re: Fosamax (Alendronate Sodium) Product Liability Litigation ORDER AMENDING APPENDIX A TO OPINION Due to inadvertent clerical errors, Appendix A to the opinion was missing one appeal number (14-3220) and a lower court number (08-cv-00008). The Appendix has been revised and the corrected version will be filed as an attachment to this orde

OPINION OF THE COURT FUENTES, Circuit Judge. Beginning in 2010, hundreds of plaintiffs filed personal-injury suits against the drug manufacturer Merck Sharp & Dohme, alleging that the osteoporosis drug Fosamax caused them to suffer serious thigh bone fractures. Each Plaintiff brought a state-law tort claim alleging that Merck failed to add an adequate w

OPINION OF THE COURT W. LOWELL BRAY, JR., Circuit Judge. FINAL DECLARATORY JUDGMENT THIS CAUSE came before the Court for nonjury trial on March 28, 29, 30 and 31, 1988, upon the plaintiffs’ Complaint for Declaratory Judgment for Unconscionable Rent against the defendant, DOUGLAS H. BELCHER, d/b/a CLUB WILDWOOD MOBILE HOME VILLAGE. Plaintiffs’ Complaint seeks a declaration th

79 Cal.Rptr.2d 408 (1998) 966 P.2d 442 19 Cal.4th 353 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Lester Robert OCHOA, Defendant and Appellant. No. S009522. Supreme Court of California. November 5, 1998. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing January 27, 1999. *423 Russell

Roe, C.J. This cause coming on to be heard on the joint stipulation of the parties hereto, the Court being fully advised in the premises, finds; That the multiple-party group of Claimants listed herein consists of 540 Claimants seeking individual judgments of varying amounts. These claims, in the aggregate amount of five hundred ninety thousand six hundred thirty-four do

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

521 F.3d 169 (2008) In re WORLD TRADE CENTER DISASTER SITE LITIGATION. William D. McCue, Barry J. Albrecht, Maureen McCue, John Baiano, Vincent McNally, Gina McNally, Lisa Deneau, Janet Healy, Michael Spiller, Frances Hickey, Joseph Healy, Lori Malloy, Leah Spiller, Timothy Villari, Maria Villari, John F. Taggart, Theresa Taggart, William Quinlan, Bertha Quinlan, James Sweeney, Kathleen Sweeney, Joan Beyer, Peter Blake, Sharon Blake, James Blake, Joh

06-5324-cv In Re: W orld Trade Center Disaster Site Litigation 1 2 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 3 4 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 5 6 7 8 August Term, 2007 9 10 (Argued: October 1, 2007 Decided: March 26, 2008) 11 12 Docket No. 06-5324-cv 13 14 15 IN RE : WORLD TRADE CE

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

880 F.2d 694 19 Bankr.Ct.Dec. 997, Bankr. L. Rep. P 72,955 In re A.H. ROBINS COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Debtor. (Eight Cases.)Rosemary MENARD-SANFORD; Karen Valenzuela; ConstanceMiller Engelsberg; Nancy Lauri Adams; CarolynHarris, Claimants-Appellants,v.Ralph R. MABEY; The Official Committee of Equity SecurityHolders; The Official Unsecured Creditors Committee of A.H.Robins Company, Incor

WIDENER, Circuit Judge: On July 26, 1988, the bankruptcy court and the district court jointly confirmed the “Sixth Amended and Restated Plan of Reorganization” (the Plan) submitted by A.H. Robins Company, Inc. (Robins). In Re A.H. Robins Co. Inc., 88 B.R. 742 (E.D.Va. 1988). Rosemary Menard-Sanford and certain other personal injury claimants, who voted against the Plan, appeal. -They challenge the district court’s a