Cases

GORDON McCLOUD, J. *1209 ¶ 1 The United States Supreme Court has tasked us with deciding whether the Washington courts violated the United States Constitution's guaranty of religious neutrality in our prior adjudication of this case. We have fully reviewed the record with this issue in

[As amended by order of the Supreme Court February 21, 2017.] Gordon McCloud, J. ¶1 The State of Washington bars discrimination in “public . . . accommodation [s]” on the basis of “sexual orientation.” RCW 49.60.215(1) (Washington Law Against Discrimination (WLAD)). Barronelle Stutzman owns and operates a place of public accommodation in our state: Arlene’s Flowers Inc. Stutzman and her public business, Arlen

GERSTEN, J. Joseph and Arlene Martin (“the adoptive parents”) seek certiorari or prohibition based on the trial court’s denial of a motion to dismiss Karen DeAngelis’ (“the biological mother”) motion to vacate an adoption. We grant the petition. The adoptive parents, the maternal grandparents of the child, L.D.M., sought to adopt L.D.M. After the biological *759

Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (Sconiers, J.), entered July 25, 2001, which denied defendant’s motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is granted and the complaint is dismissed. *904Memorand

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN THE MATTER OF A MEMBER OF THE STATE BAR OF ARIZONA, APRIL ARLENE SPONSEL, ATTORNEY N O. 23009, Respondent. No. SB-24-0007-AP Filed April 11, 2025 Appeal of Hearing Panel Opinion and Disciplinary Order fr

USCA11 Case: 21-10587 Document: 47-1 Date Filed: 09/18/2023 Page: 1 of 139 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-10587 ____________________ In re: Fundamental Long Term Care, Inc.,

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint against defendant Victor DeSimone dismissed. Memorandum: In August 1994 Victor DeSimone (defendant) served demands for a bill of particulars and various disclosure items. Plaintiff did not timely respond to those demands and, on June 20, 1995, a 30-day conditional order of preclusion was entered. Plaintiff failed to comply with that order and, on December 18, 1995, defendant

This opinion was filed for record at fJ, 0(i(),ft. onf.UJ lf£1 2Jlll (jfA-ok;;Ci ~ SUSAN L. CARLSON SUPREME COURT CLERK IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, NO. 91615-2

[Cite as State v. Martin, 2021-Ohio-1632.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PORTAGE COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 2020-P-0084 -vs- : ARLEN CHARLES M

[Cite as Martin v. Block Communications, Inc., 2017-Ohio-1474.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY James Martin Court of Appeals No. L-16-1213 Appellant Trial Court No. CI0201602367 v. Block Communications, Inc., et al. DECISION AND JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM. After carefully reviewing the record and the briefs, this court affirms the district court’s judgment in Appeal No. 89-1920 for essentially the reasons stated in the district court’s memoranda and orders. In Appeal No. 89-2063, we reverse the district court’s partial denial of the motion for summary judgment filed by defendants, six present and former officials of th

[Cite as State v. Martin, 2022-Ohio-758.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PORTAGE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 2021-P-0057 Plaintiff-Appellee, Criminal Appeal from the -v- Municipal Court, Kent Division ARLEN CHARLES MARTIN,

[Cite as State v. Martin, 2020-Ohio-291.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SANDUSKY COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. S-19-026 Appellee Trial Court No. 18 CR 644 v. Brian K. Martin DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellant Dec

Filed 12/7/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, E074315 v. (Super.Ct.No. 19PA001399) TYREL MARTIN, OPINION Defendant and Appellant.

[Cite as Good Knight Properties, L.L.C. v. Hawthorne Hills, L.L.C., 2019-Ohio-428.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY Good Knight Properties, LLC Court of Appeals No. L-18-1163 Appellant Trial Court No. CI0201703090 v. Hawthorne Hills, LLC

16 S.W.3d 127 (2000) LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, Appellant, v. August GORDON, Alfred Allen and wife, Mary Allen, Eddie Bennett and wife, Rosa Mae Bennett, Eddie J. Billingsley and wife, Arlene Billingsley, Willie J. Bolden and wife, Patricia Bolden, Oscar William Booker, Samuel Boswell and wife, Billie Ruth Boswell, Robert L. Brasfield and wife, Dorothy A. Brasfield, Dennis Brown, Individually and as personal Representative of The Estate of Port

[Cite as Old House Gifts, L.L.C. v. Peace, 2016-Ohio-2743.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY Old House Gifts, LLC, et al. Court of Appeals No. L-15-1120 Appellees Trial Court No. CI0201303348 v. Pat Peace DECISION AND JU

[Cite as Hardy v. Maveric Properties, L.L.C., 2018-Ohio-1235.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY Harriett Hardy Court of Appeals No. L-17-1167 Appellant Trial Court No. CVG-16-15220 v. Maverick Properties, LLC. DECISION AND JUDGMENT

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC., Petitioner, v. ARLENE ANDERSON, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF ZACHARY TAYLOR ANDERSON, deceased, Respondent. No. 4D2024-2577 [February 19, 2025] Petition for Writ of

[Cite as Kerger & Hartman, L.L.C. v. Ajami, 2017-Ohio-7352.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY Kerger & Hartman, LLC, et al. Court of Appeals No. L-16-1135 Plaintiffs Trial Court No. CI0200908133 v. Mohamad Ajami, et al. Appellee DECISION