⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Armando Perez III v. The People of the State of California”

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2025-01-30 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-23-00482-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ROJELIO ESTRACA JR., Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE 148TH DISTRICT COURT OF NU
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2010-06-24 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-09-00560-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG IN THE GUARDIANSHIP OF ARMANDO GARCIA CARDENAS, AN INCAPACITATED PERSON On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 of Cameron County, Texas. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Y
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2010-06-24 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-09-00560-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBUR
People v. Perezpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2015-01-27 · Published · cited 2× · 233 Cal. App. 4th 736; 182 Cal. Rptr. 3d 830; 2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 71
Opinion MOORE, Acting P. J. — Defendant Jorge Armando Juarez Perez pied guilty to possessing methamphetamine for sale and possessing a firearm within 1,000 feet of a school. The court placed him on probation and ordered him to spend 180 days in jail with credit for 157 days, including conduct credits. Defendant subsequently filed a timely motion to withdraw h
Perez v. Abbottpublic domain
District Court, W.D. Texas · 2017-08-24 · Published · cited 2× · 267 F. Supp. 3d 750
ORDER ON PLAN H358 XAVIER RODRIGUEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This Order addresses Plaintiffs’ statutory and constitutional claims against Plan H358, enacted by the 83rd Texas Legislature in 2013. The following Plaintiffs assert claims against Plan H358: The Texas Latino Redistricting Task Force1 (limited to HD90), MALC,2 th
Perez v. Abbottpublic domain
District Court, W.D. Texas · 2017-04-20 · Published · cited 7× · 250 F. Supp. 3d 123; 2017 WL 1406379; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60237
ORDER ON PLAN H283 XAVIER RODRIGUEZ, District Judge and ORLANDO L. GARCIA, District Judge: This Order addresses Plaintiffs’ claims concerning Plan H283, enacted by the 82nd Legislature in 2011. Plaintiffs assert “results” claims under § 2 of the Voting Rights Act (“VRA”), intentional vote dilution claims under § 2 of the VRA and the Fourteenth Amendment, and Shaw-type racial gerrymandering claims
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2008-02-21 · Published · cited 0× · 287 S.W.3d 43; 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 1292
OPINION Opinion by Justice BENAVIDES. By nine issues, appellant Jesus Perez Saldaña challenges his convictions for one count of indecency with a child by contact, Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 21.11(a)(1) (Vernon 2003), and two counts of aggravated sexual assault, Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.021(a) (Vernon Supp.2007). The trial court sentenced S
District Court, D. Oregon · 2014-12-17 · Published · cited 2× · 68 F. Supp. 3d 1234; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146361; 2014 WL 7228983
HERNANDEZ, District Judge: In this wage action brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219 (FLSA), Plaintiff Thomas Perez, the United States Secretary of Labor, brings three claims against Defendants Oak Grove Cinemas, Inc., Barrington Management LLC, Barrington Venture LLC, and David Emami. Plaintiff first brings a claim against all Defendants for failure to pay overtime wages to thirty-five individuals
District Court, E.D. California · 2019-06-24 · Published · cited 81× · 392 F. Supp. 3d 1162
Dale A. Drozd, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the court on a motion to dismiss plaintiffs' complaint filed on behalf of defendants. (Doc. No. 9-1.) A hearing on the motion was held on December 18, 2018. Attorney Mark Merin appeared in person on behalf of plaintiffs. Attorney John Whitefleet appeared telephonically on behalf of defendants. Having reviewed the parties' submissions, and having heard from counsel, de
District Court, N.D. California · 1996-09-17 · Published · cited 13× · 937 F. Supp. 1397; 80 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 476; 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13787; 1996 WL 532274
937 F.Supp. 1397 (1996) The ASSOCIATION OF MEXICAN-AMERICAN EDUCATORS ("AMAE"), the California Association for Asian-Pacific Bilingual Education ("CAFABE"), Oakland Alliance of Black Educators, ("OABE"), on behalf of themselves, their members, and all others similarly situated; Sara MacNeil Boyd; Sam Genis; Marta LeClaire; Antoinette Williams; Diana Kwan; Toua Yang, Robert Williams; and Agnes Haynes, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situa
Arizona Supreme Court · 2017-01-12 · Published · cited 103× · 241 Ariz. 254; 386 P.3d 798; 756 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 4; 2017 Ariz. LEXIS 23
JUSTICE TIMMER, opinion of the Court: ¶ 1 Joel Randu Escalante-Orozco was sentenced to death after a jury found him guilty of first degree murder, sexual assault, and first degree burglary. We have jurisdiction over his automatic appeal and the State’s cross-appeal under article 6, section 5(3) of the Arizona Constitution and A.R.S. § 13-4031.
California Court of Appeal · 2024-06-27 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 6/27/24 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GABRIELA CISNEROS, F081373 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. BCV-19-100294) v. OPINION DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES et al.,
People v. Navarropublic domain
California Supreme Court · 2021-10-28 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ANTHONY NAVARRO, Defendant and Appellant. S165195 Orange County Superior Court 02NF3143 October 28, 2021 Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye authored the opinion of the Court, in which Justices Corrigan
People v. Ghobrialpublic domain
California Supreme Court · 2018-06-21 · Published · cited 155× · 234 Cal. Rptr. 3d 669; 420 P.3d 179; 5 Cal. 5th 250
KRUGER, J. *679 *256 A jury found defendant John Samuel Ghobrial guilty of the first degree murder of Juan Delgado, a 12-year-old boy, and found true the special circumstance that the murder was
People v. Medinapublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2016-03-17 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 3/17/16 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- THE PEOPLE, C069965 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 08F03645) v. ANTHONY ARTURO
California Supreme Court · 2019-02-28 · Published · cited 78× · 243 Cal. Rptr. 3d 842; 434 P.3d 1121; 6 Cal. 5th 886
CORRIGAN, J. ***1127 *891 A jury convicted codefendants Oswaldo Amezcua and Joseph Conrad Flores of the first degree murders of George Flores, John Diaz, Arturo Madrigal, and Luis Reyes and fo
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2014-01-30 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-12-00536-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG TV AZTECA, S.A.B. DE C.V., PATRICIA CHAPOY, AND PUBLIXMAN, S.A. DE C.V., Appellants, v. GLORIA DE LOS ANGELES TREVINO RUIZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF HER MINOR CHILD, ANGEL GABRIEL DE JESUS TREVINO, AND ARMANDO ISMAEL GOMEZ MARTINEZ,