Cases

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-3144 ___________________________ Carolyn Arnett Plaintiff - Appellee v. Larry Norris, In his individual capacity; Ray Hobbs, In his individual capacity (originally named as R

OPINION CATTANI, Judge. ¶ 1 This is an appeal from a superior court judgment in favor of the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (“ADEQ”) against an individual who owned an underground storage tank (“UST”) that leaked gasoline. ADEQ previously obtained a remediation consent decree against the company that operated the UST, but after the company filed for bankruptcy, ADEQ learned that the company d

577 N.E.2d 773 (1991) 217 Ill. App.3d 626 160 Ill.Dec. 448 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gene H. ARNETT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 5-88-0558. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District. June 18, 1991. Rehearing Denied September 25, 1991. *774<

Cite as 2014 Ark. 540 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-14-117 Opinion Delivered December 18, 2014 PRO SE APPEAL FROM THE MICHAEL BRIAN ARNETT LINCOLN COUNTY CIRCUIT APPELLANT COURT

TOM GLAZE, Justice. This appeal represents the last in a trilogy of cases in which inmates contend they were unlawfully denied meritorious good time when the General Assembly enacted what Teddy Graham contends to be ex post facto legislation. Duncan v. State, 337 Ark. 306, 987 S.W.2d 721 (1999); Ellis v. Norris, 333 Ark. 200, 968 S.W.2d 609 (1998). Our court took jurisdiction of this case to interpret cer

Appellants Norris and Parham, and their codefendant Alvarez (who is not appealing), were charged in count I with statutory rape, in violation of Penal Code section 261, subdivision 1, in that they did have sexual intercourse with a girl named Betty, aged 16. In count II Alvarez was charged with oral copulation with a girl named Doranne, in violation of Penal Code section288a. The jury found all three defendants not

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON March 1, 2005 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. NORRIS RAY Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County Nos. 02-02917, 02-02918, 02-04286 Joseph B. Dailey, Judge No. W2004-01247-CCA-R3-CD - Filed June 27, 2005 Following a jury trial, Defendant, Norris Ray, was convicted of one

PER CURIAM. James Garner appeals from a final judgment entered in the District Court 1 for the District of Arkansas dismissing his suit brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment of the district court. James Garner, an inmate of the Arkansas Departmen

On April 5, 1922, the Prosecuting Attorney of Dent County, Missouri, filed in the office of the clerk of the circuit court of said county his verified information, charging the above named defendant with the crime of perjury. He was arraigned, entered a plea of not guilty, tried before a jury, and, on April 6, 1922, the following verdict was returned: "We, the jury, find the defendant guilty of wilful and corrupt perjury, in swearing and testifying before a jury, before whom he was bei

1. An action against a county for money had and received must be brought in the name of the county. 2. An action for money had and received must be brought within four years from the date of the accrual of the action. DECIDED MARCH 18, 1949. Mrs. Edna S. Norris, as executrix of the estate of Thomas E. Norris, brought suit in the Superior Court of Richmond County against R. P. Mayo, Scott Nixon, James P. Walker, David F.

By ©AVIES, JTaulge. THE bill in this case seeks to enjoin the defendants, from proceeding at law on a judgment, recovered by Jesse Ham against the intestate Jeremiah Pitman, in his life time, and which has been assigned to the other defendant, W. A. Pitman, and prays to have satisfaction entered on the judgment. The facts disclosed by the bill and answers are, that one Thoma

388 S.C. 343 (2010) 698 S.E.2d 559 Carolyn CHESTER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Sherman E. Boutte, Jr., Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, South Carolina Department of Transportation, South Carolina Forestry Commission, Gary Thomas LaSalle, COBRA Transport a/k/a Cobra Automobile Transporting, Alternative Transport Services, Florida Auto Transport, Vic Mullins as the Personal Represent

81 B.R. 205 (1988) COLUMBIA PACKING COMPANY, Appellant, v. PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION, Appellee. Civ. No. 85-2241-C. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. January 6, 1988. *206 Richard E. Mikels, P.C., Whitton E. Norris III, Peabody & Brown, Boston, Mass., for appellant. Angela Arnett, General Couns

Defendant, the state of Ohio, Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, appeals from an $18,000 judgment entered against it in the Court of Claims as the result of an injury sustained by plaintiff, Russell McCoy, an inmate of the Chillicothe Correctional Institute, while he was working on the prison farm located on prison premises. Yearling bulls, each weighing four hundred to five hundred fifty pounds, were enclosed in a fenced corral while waiting to undergo castration. Two chutes

[Cite as State v. Faiola, 2022-Ohio-1126.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MAHONING COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICHAEL FAIOLA, Defendant-Appe

135 Ariz. 189 (1983) 659 P.2d 1334 Jerome M. CAIN and Ludmilla S. Cain, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE CO., a Connecticut corporation; William C. Menge and Jane Doe Menge, husband and wife; and John Doe, Defendants-Appellees. No. 1 CA-CIV 5576. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department A. January 27, 1983.

[Cite as State v. Harris, 2016-Ohio-4566.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 103526 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 126,747 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. JAVAN JERMAINE ERVIN, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Prosecutors have wide latitude to conduct the State's cas

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT No. 24-3108 AZADEH KHATIBI, M.D., an individual; DO NO HARM, a D.C. No. Virginia nonprofit corporation, 2:23-cv-06195- MRA-E Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. OPINION RANDY HAWKINS, in

Per Curiam: Plaintiff Donna Schlaikjer seeks reversal of the Court of Appeals’ decision affirming summary judgment in favor of defendant James D. Kaplan, M.D. Schlaikjer sued Kaplan for medical malpractice arising out of surgeries to treat her tracheal stenosis. Kaplan filed a successful motion in limine to prevent Schlaikjer’s subsequent treating physician and designated expert, Joel Cooper, M.D., from testify