Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Arthur Leslie Goodwin”
Laborers Health And Welfare Trust Fund For Northern California v. Leslie G. Delbon Co., Inc.public domain
199 F.3d 1109 (9th Cir. 2000) LABORERS HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; LABORERS VACATION-HOLIDAY TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; LABORERS PENSION TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; LABORERS TRAINING AND RETRAINING TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees,v.LESLIE G. DELBON CO., INC., a California corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant. Nos. 98-1
Depomed, Inc. v. Ivax Corp.public domain
532 F.Supp.2d 1170 (2007) DEPOMED, INC., Plaintiff, v. IVAX CORPORATION and Ivax Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Defendants. No. C 06-00100 CRB. United States District Court, N.D. California. December 12, 2007. *1171 *1172 *1173 Christine Saunders. Haskett, Michael
CLAY, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which KEITH, J., joined. BATCHELDER, J., concurred in Part IV only. OPINION CLAY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff, Brownell Combs, II, Administrator C.T.A. of the Estate of Leslie Combs, II, deceased, appeals an order granting Defendant, International Insurance Company, summary judgment aga
Mallory v. Drakepublic domain
616 S.W.2d 124 (1981) Arthur L. MALLORY, Commissioner of Education, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Mr. and Mrs. Lester DRAKE, parents of Deborah Drake, Defendants-Respondents. No. WD 32450. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. May 4, 1981. *125 John Ashcroft, Atty. Gen., Leslie Ann Schneider, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferso
United States v. Quinonespublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOSEPH R. GOODWIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the court is the defendant’s Motion to Recuse. [ECF No. 34]. The defendant asks that I recuse myself from this case pursuant to either 28 U.S.C. § 455(b)(5)(ii) or § 455(a) because of my son’s past tenure as United States Attorney for the Southern District of West Virginia. For the reasons discussed below, this Motion
DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge. Because class actions are brought in the names of only a few representative plaintiffs on behalf of a larger defined group, it happens from time to time that duplicate or overlapping class actions are filed. When this occurs, it normally is necessary to decide which lawsuit (if any) definitively resolves a matter between particular parties. That is th
Sayre v. Pottspublic domain
32 F.Supp.2d 881 (1999) Charlotte Judy SAYRE and Stewart Sayre, Plaintiffs, v. Brian POTTS and Cherrington Scrap Metals, Inc., an Ohio corporation, Defendants. No. CIV.A. 6:98-1120. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Parkersburg Division. January 8, 1999. *882 *883 Todd S. Wisem
722 F.Supp.2d 1157 (2010) MAINE STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Case No. 2:10-cv-00302-MRP-MANx. United States District Court, C.D. California. November 4, 2010. *1159 Andrew L. Zivitz, Jennifer L. Joost, Lau
Ruben Carnero v. Boston Scientific Corporationpublic domain
LEVIN H. CAMPBELL, Senior Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant Ruben Carnero (“Carnero”) appeals from judgments of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts dismissing his federal and state law complaints against Boston Scientific Corporation (“BSC”). Both complaints alleged that BSC had terminated him in retaliation for “whistleblowing” — for telling BSC tha
Tolley v. Monsanto Co.public domain
(2008) William TOLLEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MONSANTO COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Mary Lou Brewer, Plaintiff, v. Monsanto Company, et al., Defendants. Everette Hedrick, Plaintiff, v. Monsanto Company, et al., Defendants. Chris Morris, Plaintiffs, v. Monsanto Company, et al., Defendants. Robert Hedrick, Plaintiff, v. Monsanto Company, et al., Defendants. Sandra Parri, Plaintiff, v. Mons
DATE: 11/13/2018 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 15:29:24 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE REPORT: ctrk_crt SORT BY : COUNTY CODE, LAWYER LAST NAME CRITERIA: COMPLIANCE YEAR END DATE = 04302018 GROUP 1, REINST FEE ASSESSED _______________________________________________________
Alexander v. Oklahomapublic domain
LUCERO, Circuit Judge, dissenting, with whom SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge, joins. No case in my tenure on the court could be more compellingly described as meeting the Rule 35 en banc standard of presenting a “question of exceptional importance” deserving the attention of the entire court than this. In one of the more shameful events in our nation’s history, over two hundred African-Americans were slaughtered and a
In Re Angelika Films 57th, Inc.public domain
227 B.R. 29 (1998) In re ANGELIKA FILMS 57TH INC., Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 96 B 41643(AJG). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. November 9, 1998. *30 *31 *32 Jaspan, Schlesinger, Silverman & Hoffman LLP, by Gary F. Herbst, Garden City, NY, for trustee
Lundin v. Mecham (In re Benny)public domain
GOODWIN, Circuit Judge: A decade after the constitutionality of the current bankruptcy court structure was settled, the denial of attorney fees to the six bankruptcy judges whose efforts, as amici, had brought about the solution that satisfied both the Constitution and the judges, has produced this appeal. The six bankruptcy judges were plaintiffs in the first case in a series of constitutional challen
Propes v. Quartermanpublic domain
573 F.3d 225 (2009) Johnnie R. PROPES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Nathaniel QUARTERMAN, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent-Appellee. No. 07-40833. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. June 26, 2009. *226 Johnnie R. Propes, Teague, TX, pro se. Kathryn C. Ga
Foamseal, Inc. v. Dow Chemical Co.public domain
991 F.Supp. 883 (1998) FOAMSEAL, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. 96-71129. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. January 30, 1998. David G. Hetzel, Ronald W. Zdrojeski, David R. Greene, LeBouf, Lamb, Greene, & MacRae, LLP, Hartford, CT, Paul S. Lewandowski, Butzel Long, Detroit, MI, Thomas
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KEITH P. ELLISON, District Judge. This case arises out of the April 20, 2010 Maeondo well blowout and the resulting explosion on the drilling rig Deepwater Horizon which killed 11 people; injured dozens of others; and set off a chain of events culminating in 87 days of crude oil spilling directly into deepwater Gulf of Mexico. The Maeondo well was a joint venture amon
In Re Bennypublic domain
81 F.3d 91 34 Fed.R.Serv.3d 331, 28 Bankr.Ct.Dec. 1037,96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2542,96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4208,96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4323 In re George I. BENNY, Debtor.Keith M. LUNDIN, Judge; Mark B. McFeeley, Judge; WilliamL. Norton, Judge; George C. Paine, II, Judge;Hugh Robinson; Arthur N. Votolato, Jr.,Judge, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.L. Ralph MECHAM, Director, of the AO, De
Walls v. Statepublic domain
652 S.W.2d 37 (1983) 8 Ark.App. 315 Arthur J. WALLS, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee. No. CA CR 82-180. Court of Appeals of Arkansas. June 8, 1983. Rehearing Denied July 6, 1983. *38 Felver A. Rowell, Jr., Morrilton, for appellant. Steve Clark, Atty. Gen. by Leslie M. Powe
Morgan, J. United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 367 (union) appeals the superior court’s denial of an injunction. We affirm. Carl and Debbie Bland operate a food store known as Canned Foods Grocery Outlet. They employ nonunion workers. The store has a parking lot. The record does not show *56the size of the parking lot, but