Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
4 opinions for “Atienza v. Wells Fargo”
Divino Plastic Surgery, Inc. v. Superior Courtpublic domain
Filed 4/22/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DIVINO PLASTIC SURGERY, INC. D079661 et al., (San Diego County Petitioners, Super. Ct. No. 37-2019-00058375- CU-MM-CTL) v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
Divino Plastic Surgery v. Super. Ct.public domain
Filed 5/19/22 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DIVINO PLASTIC SURGERY, INC. D079661 et al., (San Diego County Petitioners, Super. Ct. No. 37-2019-00058375-
Chrysler Corp. v. Fedders Corp.public domain
BOYCE F. MARTIN, Circuit Judge. Chrysler Corporation appeals the dismissal of its complaint charging Fedders Corporation and others with violations of the antitrust laws. The case arose after Chrysler entered into an agreement with Fedders to sell virtually all the assets of Chrysler’s Airtemp Division. The Airtemp Division was engaged in the business of designing, manufacturing, marketing, and servicing non-automotive air
Chrysler Corporation v. Fedders Corporationpublic domain
643 F.2d 1229 1981-1 Trade Cases 63,886 CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.FEDDERS CORPORATION, Fedders International Corporation,Airtemp Corporation, Airtemp InternationalCorporation, Fedders World TradeCorporation and Interclisa,S.A., Defendants-Appellees. No. 78-1287. United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit.