Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
10 opinions for “Atlantic States v. Vancouver Ice & Fuel”
United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.public domain
449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri
350 MONTANA V. DEBRA HAALANDpublic domain
FILED FOR PUBLICATION OCT 14 2022 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 350 MONTANA; MONTANA No. 20-35411 ENVIRON
350 Montana v. Debra Haalandpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 350 MONTANA; MONTANA No. 20-35411 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION CENTER; SIERRA CLUB; WILDEARTH D.C. No. GUARDIANS, 9:19-cv-00012- Plaintiffs-Appellants, DWM v. OPINION DEBRA HAALAND, Secretary of the Department of the Interior; U.S. OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING, an agency wi
KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal of a $5 billion punitive damages award arising out of the Exxon Valdez oil spill. This is not a case about befouling the environment. This is a case about commercial fishing. The jury was specifically instructed that it could not award damages for environmental harm. The reason is that under a stipulation with the United States and Alaska, Exxon had already been punished f
270 F.3d 1215 (9th Cir. 2001) IN RE: THE EXXON VALDEZ,GRANT BAKER, ET AL., AS REPRESENTATIVES OF THE MANDATORY PUNITIVE DAMAGES CLASS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEESv.JOSEPH HAZELWOOD, DEFENDANT,ANDEXXON CORPORATION; EXXON SHIPPING COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTSIN RE: THE EXXON VALDEZ,GRANT BAKER, ET AL., AS REPRESENTATIVES OF THE MANDATORY PUNITIVE DAMAGES CLASS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES,v.EXXON CORPORATION; EXXON SHIPPING CO
Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co.public domain
358 U.S. 354 (1959) ROMERO v. INTERNATIONAL TERMINAL OPERATING CO. ET AL. No. 3. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 13, 1958. Restored to the calendar for reargument May 19, 1958. Reargued October 22-23, 1958. Decided February 24, 1959. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
ACCEPTED 03-14-00738-CV 5659167 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
ACCEPTED 03-14-00738-CV 5659032 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Cole County affirming an order of the Public Service Commission dated November 30, 1934, which fixed for rate-making purposes the fair value of the property of the appellant Laclede Gas Light Company, a large public utility operating in St. Louis, and ordered a six per cent reduction in rates to domestic and commercial consumers. The valuation fixed by the Commission is $39,000,000. The Company contends it should be at least $50,000,00
ACCEPTED 03-14-00738-CV SEE AMENDED BRF 5648230 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS FILED ON 6/15/15 AUSTIN, TEXAS