Cases

OPINION AND ORDER James P. Jones, United States District Judge In this breach of contract action arising under Virginia law, a jury found for the plaintiff and counterclaim defendants, Knox Energy, LLC and Consol Energy, Inc., on the ground that there was no mutual assent to enter into the alleged contract. The defendant and counterclaim plaintiff, Gaseo Drilling, Inc.,’ has moved for a new trial pursuant

Representing Alexander Reed Mantle and Marjorie M. Mantle: Stephen R. Winship, Winship & Winship, PC, Casper, Wyoming. Argument by Mr. Winship. Representing Gary W. Garland, Hot Iron, Inc., and GT Investments, Inc.: Kim D. Cannon & Codie D. Henderson, Davis & Cannon, LLP, Sheridan, Wyoming. Argument by Mr. Cannon. Representing WyoDak Energy Services, LLC: Greg L. Goddard, Goddard and Vogel, P.C., Buffalo, Wyoming.

THAPAR, Circuit Judge. Deadlines matter. Ritzen Group missed two of them: the closing deadline in a contract and the appellate deadline for bankruptcy orders. Accordingly, the district court rejected both of Ritzen's appeals. We affirm. I. Over five years ago, Ritzen Group contracted to buy a piece of property from Jackson Masonry. But the sal

748 F.Supp.2d 656 (2010) DUKE ENERGY INTERNATIONAL, L.L.C. et al., Plaintiffs, v. Michael J. NAPOLI, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. H-09-2408. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. September 21, 2010. *662 Gerard G. Pecht, Amy Garzon, Brian Cody Boyle, Fulbright Jaworski LLP, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff

*244OPINION STRINE, Chancellor. The incumbent management and board of SandRidge Energy, an oil and natural gas business focusing on domestic exploration and production, face a serious proxy fight. A hedge fund, TPG-Axon (“TPG”), which holds a 7% stake in SandRidge, has launched a consent solicitation to destag-ger SandRidge’s seven-member board by ame

FINDINGS OF FACT, RULINGS OF LAW, AND ORDER FOR JUDGMENT YOUNG, District Judge.1 I. INTRODUCTION McMahan Jets, LLC (“McMahan”) brings this diversity case against Roadlink Transportation, Inc. (“Roadlink”), Rizo Jet Aviation Services, LLC (“Rizo”), and John and Jane Doe, the purported owners of Roadlink. The case arises from the sale of a Cessna Citation Air

MEMORANDUM OPINION KARON OWEN BOWDRE, Chief Judge. This matter comes before the court on Defendants CMC, Inc and Harsco Corporation’s “Joint Motion for Summary Judgment,” (Doc. 74), and CMC and Harsco’s “Joint Motion to Exclude Testimony of DR Davies Contractor LLC,” (Doc. 76). Plaintiff Gadsden Industrial Park, LLC sued CMC and Harsco for conversion and negligence stemm

MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLIAM D. QUARLES, JR., District Judge. Branhaven, LLC (“Branhaven”) sued BeefTek, Inc. (“BeefTek”), BT Selection, LLC (“BTS”), and PrimeBeefMarker, LLC (“PML”) (collectively the “defendants”) 1 for declaratory judgment and an injunction. The defendants counterclaimed, joining Scidera, Inc. (“Scidera”) as a counterdefendant, for declaratory judgment and spe

ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

747 F.Supp.2d 568 (2010) IRWIN INDUSTRIAL TOOL COMPANY, d/b/a BernzOmatic and Newell Operating Company, Plaintiffs, v. WORTHINGTON CYLINDERS WISCONSIN, LLC, Worthington Cylinder Corporation, and Worthington Industries, Inc., Defendants. Civil Case No. 3:08cv291. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division. October 1, 2010.

BACHARACH, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I join virtually all of Chief Judge Bris-coe’s thorough, persuasive opinion. But, I respectfully dissent on Part IV(A)(2). There, the majority rejects the Petitioners’ challenge to the sufficiency of the budget for the Universal Service Fund. On this limited issue, I respectfully dissent. In my view, the FC

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NANCY F. ATLAS, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. BACKGROUND'.........................................................702 A. The Primary and Primary Runoff Elections ............................702 B. Plaintiffs’Allegations and Evidence....................................703

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 18–1199 Filed January 10, 2020 ROY KARON and PEDDLER LLC, Appellants, vs. ELLIOTT AVIATION, JAMES MITCHELL, WYNN ELLIOTT, ELLIOTT AVIATION AIRCRAFT SALES, INC., and ELLIOTT JETS, Appellees. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, David N. May, Judge. The plaintiffs appeal a district court order dismissing their claims without prejudice based on

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION SEAN H. LANE, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Before the Court is the motion [ECF No. 291]1 of the Chapter 7 Trustee (the “Trustee”) in the bankruptcy case of Roman Sledziejowski (the “Debtor”) for in-junctive relief against a number of defendants and third parties in this adversary proceeding. The requested relief relates to a preliminary injun

OPINION Holly Kirby, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Jeffrey S. Bivins, C.J., and Cornelia A. Clark, Sharon G. Lee, and Roger A. Page, JJ., joined. We granted this appeal to address whether our holding in W

ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 5176028 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3

ACCEPTED 03-15-00293-CV 8312780 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

Joseph M. Hood, Senior U.S. District Judge This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant John Parrott [DE 33]. Plaintiffs have filed a Response [DE 176], and Defendant has filed a Reply [DE 181] in further support of his motion.1 I. Plaintiffs aver that the various defendants, acting together, defrauded them and other unsuspe

OPINION KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Caroline Chevalier and Defendant-Appellee Kimberly Barn-hart 1 met, fell in love, and were married. Throughout the course of their marriage, Chevalier made a series of loans to Barn-hart, which Barnhart never repaid. Chevalier filed